Barbour Michael S, Litvaitis John A
Wildlife Program, Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, 03824, Durham, NH, USA.
Oecologia. 1993 Sep;95(3):321-327. doi: 10.1007/BF00320983.
We examined physical condition, niche dimensions, and survival of New England cottontails (Sylvilagus transitionalis) that occupied 21 habitat patches of different sizes during winter. Rabbits on small patches (≤2.5 ha) were predominantly males, and both sexes had lower body mass than individuals on large patches (≥5.0 ha). Niche indices (β, where β ranges from 0 to 1. and values approaching 1 indicate generalized resource use) of habitat use revealed that rabbits on small patches used a greater variety of microhabitats (based on understory stem density: β, and proximity to cover: β) than rabbits occupying large patches (β=0.65, β=0.66). Rabbits on small patches also consumed low quality forage more often and fed at sites farther from escape cover than rabbits on large patches. There were no significant correlations between rabbit densities and niche dimensions. Niche expansion was not a result of compertitive release or relaxation of predator pressure. Rabbits on small patches apparently modified their niche dimensions in response to resource limitations. This response included occupying sites with limited understory cover that apparently resulted in rabbits on small patches having a lower survival rate (0.35) than rabbits on large patches (0.69) during a 10-week monitoring period. Skewed sex ratios and low survival rates among rabbits on small patches suggest that these habitats act as sinks to dispersing, juveniles from large (source) patches. As a result, local populations of New England cottontails may become vulnerable to extinction if larte patches of habitat are not maintained.
我们研究了新英格兰棉尾兔(Sylvilagus transitionalis)的身体状况、生态位维度和冬季在21个不同大小栖息地斑块中的生存情况。小斑块(≤2.5公顷)上的兔子主要为雄性,且两性的体重均低于大斑块(≥5.0公顷)上的个体。栖息地利用的生态位指数(β,β范围为0至1,值接近1表明资源利用具有普遍性)显示,小斑块上的兔子比占据大斑块的兔子利用了更多种类的微生境(基于林下茎密度:β,以及与掩护物的接近程度:β)(β=0.65,β=0.66)。小斑块上的兔子也比大斑块上的兔子更频繁地食用低质量草料,且在离逃生掩护物更远的地方觅食。兔子密度与生态位维度之间没有显著相关性。生态位扩展不是竞争释放或捕食压力放松的结果。小斑块上的兔子显然因资源限制而改变了它们的生态位维度。这种反应包括占据林下掩护有限的地点,这显然导致小斑块上的兔子在10周的监测期内生存率(0.35)低于大斑块上的兔子(0.69)。小斑块上兔子的性别比例失衡和低生存率表明,这些栖息地对于来自大(源)斑块的扩散幼兔来说是汇。因此,如果不维持大片栖息地,新英格兰棉尾兔的当地种群可能会变得易灭绝。