Kacprzak Małgorzata, Neczaj Ewa, Fijałkowski Krzysztof, Grobelak Anna, Grosser Anna, Worwag Małgorzata, Rorat Agnieszka, Brattebo Helge, Almås Åsgeir, Singh Bal Ram
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology (CUT), Czestochowa, Poland.
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology (CUT), Czestochowa, Poland.
Environ Res. 2017 Jul;156:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
The main objective of the present review is to compare the existing sewage sludge management solutions in terms of their environmental sustainability. The most commonly used strategies, that include treatment and disposal has been favored within the present state-of-art, considering existing legislation (at European and national level), characterization, ecotoxicology, waste management and actual routs used currently in particular European countries. Selected decision making tools, namely End-of-waste criteria and Life Cycle Assessment has been proposed in order to appropriately assess the possible environmental, economic and technical evaluation of different systems. Therefore, some basic criteria for the best suitable option selection has been described, in the circular economy "from waste to resources" sense. The importance of sewage sludge as a valuable source of matter and energy has been appreciated, as well as a potential risk related to the application of those strategies.
本综述的主要目的是比较现有污水污泥管理解决方案在环境可持续性方面的情况。考虑到现行立法（欧洲和国家层面）、特性、生态毒理学、废物管理以及当前欧洲特定国家实际采用的途径，目前最常用的策略（包括处理和处置）在现有技术水平中受到青睐。为了适当地评估不同系统可能的环境、经济和技术评估，提出了选定的决策工具，即废物终态标准和生命周期评估。因此，从循环经济“从废物到资源”的意义上，描述了选择最佳适用选项的一些基本标准。污水污泥作为物质和能源的宝贵来源的重要性已得到认可，同时也认识到与这些策略应用相关的潜在风险。
