Suppr超能文献

糖尿病合并稳定型缺血性心脏病老年患者的胰岛素治疗与死亡率:来自BARI-2D试验的见解

Insulin provision therapy and mortality in older adults with diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease: Insights from BARI-2D trial.

作者信息

Damluji Abdulla A, Cohen Erin R, Moscucci Mauro, Myerburg Robert J, Cohen Mauricio G, Brooks Maria M, Rich Michael W, Forman Daniel E

机构信息

Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, LifeBridge Health Cardiovascular Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States; Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Cardiovascular Division, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.048. Epub 2017 Mar 11.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Optimal strategies for glucose control in very old adults with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of insulin provision (IP) therapy versus insulin sensitizing (IS) therapy for glycemic control in older (≥75years) and younger (<75years) adults with type II diabetes (DM) and SIHD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) were studied. The BARI 2D study population (all with type II DM and SIHD) was randomized twice: (1) between revascularization plus intensive medical therapy versus intensive medical therapy alone, and (2) between IP versus IS therapies. The primary endpoint was all-cause-mortality over five-year follow-up. In this substudy outcomes related to IP vs. IS are assessed in relation to age. Adults aged ≥75years who received IP versus IS are compared to those <75years who received IP versus IS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of IP vs. IS on outcomes in the two age groups.

RESULTS

2368 subjects with SIHD and DM were enrolled in BARI 2D; 182 (8%) were ≥75years. Compared to younger subjects, the older cohort had lower BMI, higher diuretic use, worse kidney function, and increased history of heart failure. Within the older cohort, the IP and IS subgroups were similar in respect to baseline cardiovascular risk factors, medications, and coronary artery disease severity. During follow-up, the older subjects receiving IP therapy had higher cardiovascular mortality compared to those receiving IS therapy (16% vs. 11%, p=0.040). Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, the older IP subjects were at increased risk for all-cause-mortality (hazard ratio 1.89, CI 1.1-3.2, p=0.020). No mortality difference between IP and IS was observed in those <75years of age.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Among adults with diabetes and SIHD aged ≥75years, IP therapy may be associated with increased mortality compared to IS therapy. Additional studies are needed to further refine optimal treatment strategies for diabetes and SIHD in old age.

摘要

重要性

糖尿病合并稳定型缺血性心脏病(SIHD)的高龄成年人的最佳血糖控制策略尚不清楚。

目的

比较胰岛素补充(IP)疗法与胰岛素增敏(IS)疗法对患有II型糖尿病(DM)和SIHD的老年(≥75岁)及年轻(<75岁)成年人血糖控制的效果。

设计、地点和参与者:对参加旁路血管成形术血运重建研究2糖尿病(BARI 2D)的成年人进行了研究。BARI 2D研究人群(均患有II型DM和SIHD)进行了两次随机分组:(1)在血运重建加强化药物治疗与单纯强化药物治疗之间,以及(2)在IP疗法与IS疗法之间。主要终点是五年随访期间的全因死亡率。在这项子研究中,评估了与IP和IS相关的结局与年龄的关系。将接受IP与IS治疗的≥75岁成年人与接受IP与IS治疗的<75岁成年人进行比较。采用多变量Cox回归分析评估IP与IS对两个年龄组结局的影响。

结果

2368名患有SIHD和DM的受试者参加了BARI 2D研究;182名(8%)≥75岁。与年轻受试者相比,老年队列的体重指数较低、利尿剂使用较多、肾功能较差且心力衰竭病史增加。在老年队列中,IP和IS亚组在基线心血管危险因素、药物治疗和冠状动脉疾病严重程度方面相似。在随访期间,接受IP治疗的老年受试者的心血管死亡率高于接受IS治疗的受试者(16%对11%,p=0.040)。使用Cox比例风险分析,接受IP治疗的老年受试者全因死亡风险增加(风险比1.89,CI 1.1 - 3.2,p=0.020)。在<75岁的人群中,未观察到IP和IS之间的死亡率差异。

结论及相关性

在年龄≥75岁的糖尿病合并SIHD成年人中,与IS疗法相比,IP疗法可能与死亡率增加相关。需要进一步开展研究以进一步完善老年糖尿病和SIHD的最佳治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验