• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量替扎尼定与酮咯酸或萘普生联合使用可增强其抗伤害感受和抗炎作用,同时减少副作用。

Low doses of tizanidine synergize the anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of ketorolac or naproxen while reducing of side effects.

机构信息

Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, Mexico; Centro de Investigación para el Desarrollo Industrial, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.

Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

出版信息

Eur J Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 15;805:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.021
PMID:28315341
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether tizanidine, an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, is able to increase the anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effects of naproxen and ketorolac with a low incidence of gastric injury and spontaneous activity in rats. The anti-inflammatory effect was assayed in a carrageenan test, and oral administration of tizanidine (ED =0.94±0.2mg/kg), naproxen (ED=3.18±0.4mg/kg), and ketorolac (ED=16.4±1.9mg/kg) showed a dose-dependent effect on inflammation. The anti-nociceptive effect was assayed in the formalin test, and administration of tizanidine (ED=0.39±0.06mg/kg, p.o.), naproxen (ED=33.9±3.9mg/kg, p.o.) or ketorolac (ED=6.49±1mg/kg, p.o.) each showed a dose-dependent anti-nociceptive effect. The effects of combinations of tizanidine/naproxen and tizanidine/ketorolac were determined considering their ED at a rate of 1:1. Additionally, the tizanidine/naproxen and tizanidine/ketorolac combinations showed anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effects. The tizanidine/ketorolac combination was more potent than tizanidine/naproxen, in both inflammatory (interaction index=0.03 tizanidine/ketorolac and 0.07 tizanidine/naproxen) and nociceptive (interaction index=0.005 tizanidine/ketorolac and 0.01 tizanidine/naproxen) processes. In both cases, tizanidine improved naproxen and ketorolac gastrointestinal tolerability by 50%. Furthermore, co-administration of tizanidine with naproxen or ketorolac did not modify the spontaneous activity in the same way as individual tizanidine administration. Considering that tizanidine increases the anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effects of naproxen or ketorolac, with an increase in gastric tolerability, tizanidine could provide therapeutic advantages in the clinical treatment of inflammation and pain.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨 α2-肾上腺素受体激动剂替扎尼定是否能增强萘普生和酮咯酸的抗炎和镇痛作用,同时降低胃损伤和自发性活动的发生率。在角叉菜胶试验中检测抗炎作用,替扎尼定(ED=0.94±0.2mg/kg)、萘普生(ED=3.18±0.4mg/kg)和酮咯酸(ED=16.4±1.9mg/kg)的口服给药呈剂量依赖性抗炎作用。在福尔马林试验中检测镇痛作用,替扎尼定(ED=0.39±0.06mg/kg,po)、萘普生(ED=33.9±3.9mg/kg,po)或酮咯酸(ED=6.49±1mg/kg,po)的给药均呈剂量依赖性镇痛作用。考虑到替扎尼定/萘普生和替扎尼定/酮咯酸的 ED 值为 1:1,确定了这两种药物联合应用的效果。此外,替扎尼定/萘普生和替扎尼定/酮咯酸联合应用具有抗炎和镇痛作用。替扎尼定/酮咯酸联合应用比替扎尼定/萘普生联合应用更有效,在炎症(相互作用指数=0.03 替扎尼定/酮咯酸和 0.07 替扎尼定/萘普生)和疼痛(相互作用指数=0.005 替扎尼定/酮咯酸和 0.01 替扎尼定/萘普生)过程中均如此。在这两种情况下,替扎尼定都将萘普生和酮咯酸的胃肠道耐受性提高了 50%。此外,与单独使用替扎尼定相比,替扎尼定与萘普生或酮咯酸联合使用不会以相同的方式改变自发性活动。鉴于替扎尼定能增强萘普生或酮咯酸的抗炎和镇痛作用,同时提高胃耐受性,替扎尼定可能在炎症和疼痛的临床治疗中具有治疗优势。

相似文献

1
Low doses of tizanidine synergize the anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of ketorolac or naproxen while reducing of side effects.低剂量替扎尼定与酮咯酸或萘普生联合使用可增强其抗伤害感受和抗炎作用,同时减少副作用。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 15;805:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
2
Modulation of NSAID-induced antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects by alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists with gastroprotective effects.具有胃保护作用的α2肾上腺素能受体激动剂对非甾体抗炎药诱导的镇痛和抗炎作用的调节
Life Sci. 2002 May 3;70(24):2857-69. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(02)01549-7.
3
Synergistic effect of the interaction between naproxen and citral on inflammation in rats.萘普生和柠檬醛相互作用对大鼠炎症的协同效应。
Phytomedicine. 2010 Dec 15;18(1):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
4
The combination of naproxen and citral reduces nociception and gastric damage in rats.萘普生和柠檬醛的联合使用可减少大鼠的痛觉和胃损伤。
Arch Pharm Res. 2010 Oct;33(10):1691-7. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-1020-9. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
5
Evaluation of anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenic potential of zinc-ibuprofen and zinc-naproxen complexes in rats.评价锌-布洛芬和锌-萘普生配合物在大鼠体内的抗炎和致溃疡潜力。
Inflammopharmacology. 2017 Dec;25(6):653-663. doi: 10.1007/s10787-017-0361-0. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
Pharmacological interaction of α-bisabolol and diclofenac on nociception, inflammation, and gastric integrity in rats.α-红没药醇与双氯芬酸对大鼠痛觉、炎症和胃黏膜完整性的药理相互作用。
Drug Dev Res. 2018 Feb;79(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21418. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Analysis of the analgesic interactions between ketorolac and tramadol during arthritic nociception in rat.大鼠关节炎性伤害感受过程中酮咯酸与曲马多镇痛相互作用的分析
Eur J Pharmacol. 2004 Jan 26;484(2-3):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.11.005.
8
NO-naproxen modulates inflammation, nociception and downregulates T cell response in rat Freund's adjuvant arthritis.一氧化氮-萘普生调节大鼠弗氏佐剂性关节炎中的炎症、痛觉,并下调T细胞反应。
Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Jul;130(6):1399-405. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703449.
9
Galactosyl prodrug of ketorolac: synthesis, stability, and pharmacological and pharmacokinetic evaluations.酮咯酸的半乳糖基前药:合成、稳定性以及药理学和药代动力学评价
J Med Chem. 2009 Jun 25;52(12):3794-800. doi: 10.1021/jm900051r.
10
B vitamins increase the analgesic effect of ketorolac in the formalin test in the rat.在大鼠福尔马林试验中,B族维生素可增强酮咯酸的镇痛效果。
Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 2004;47:95-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Tizanidine: Advances in Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Drug Formulations.替扎尼定:药理学与治疗学及药物制剂的进展
J Pain Res. 2024 Mar 21;17:1257-1271. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S461032. eCollection 2024.
2
Stimulation of Erythrocyte Membrane Blebbing by Naproxen Sodium.萘普生钠对红细胞膜泡形成的刺激作用。
Dose Response. 2020 Jan 14;18(1):1559325819899259. doi: 10.1177/1559325819899259. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.