Furlan Carlo, Arcangeli Stefano, Avanzo Michele, Mirri Maria A, Munoz Fernando, Giudici Stefania, Perrone Antonio, Amelio Dante, Tomio Luigi, Draghini Loredana, Deli Aniko M, Pavanato Giovanni, Giuliano Francesca M, Pontoriero Antonio, Ciammella Patrizia, Navarria Pierina, Iannalfi Alberto, Buglione Michela, Guida Cesare, Cammelli Silvia, Iorio Vincenzo, Cardinali Massimo, Genovesi Domenico, Barsacchi Lucia, Balducci Mario, Bagnoli Rita, Berti Franco, Montesi Giampaolo, Pasqualetti Francesco, Bonome Paolo, Santoni Riccardo, Doino Daniela, Schirru Patrizia, Pinzi Valentina, Borzillo Valentina, Ferrarese Fabio, Ferro Marica, Cicco Luigi De, Krengli Marco, Scoccianti Silvia, Donato Vittorio
1 Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano (Pordenone) - Italy.
2 Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome - Italy.
Tumori. 2018 Dec;104(6):466-470. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000615. Epub 2018 May 8.
To assess the contribution of Italian radiation oncologists in the current management of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG), focusing on a reirradiation (reRT) approach.
In 2015, the Reirradiation and the Central Nervous System Study Groups on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) proposed a survey. All Italian radiation oncologists were individually invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their clinical management of recurrent HGG, focusing on a reRT approach.
A total of 37 of 210 questionnaires were returned (18% of all centers): 16 (43%) from nonacademic hospitals, 14 (38%) from academic hospitals, 5 (13%) from private institutions, and 2 (6%) from hadron therapy centers. The majority of responding centers (59%) treated ≤5 cases per year. Performance status at the time of recurrence, along with a target diameter <5 cm and an interval from primary radiation ≥6 months, were the prevalent predictive factors considered for reRT. Sixty percent of reirradiated patients had already received a salvage therapy, either chemotherapy (40%) or reoperation (20%). The most common approach for reRT was fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to a mean (photon) dose of 41.6 Gy.
Although there were wide variations in the clinical practice of reRT across the 37 centers, the core activities were reasonably consistent. These findings provide a basis for encouraging a national collaborative study to develop, implement, and monitor the use of reRT in this challenging clinical setting.
评估意大利放射肿瘤学家在复发性高级别胶质瘤(HGG)当前管理中的贡献,重点关注再程放疗(reRT)方法。
2015年,再程放疗和中枢神经系统研究小组代表意大利放射肿瘤学会(AIRO)发起了一项调查。邀请所有意大利放射肿瘤学家单独完成一份关于复发性HGG临床管理的在线问卷,重点是再程放疗方法。
共收回210份问卷中的37份(占所有中心的18%):16份(43%)来自非学术医院,14份(38%)来自学术医院,5份(13%)来自私立机构,2份(6%)来自强子治疗中心。大多数回复中心(59%)每年治疗≤5例患者。复发时的功能状态,以及靶直径<5 cm和距初次放疗间隔≥6个月,是再程放疗时普遍考虑的预测因素。60%的接受再程放疗的患者已经接受过挽救治疗,要么是化疗(40%),要么是再次手术(20%)。再程放疗最常用的方法是分割立体定向放射治疗,平均(光子)剂量为41.6 Gy。
尽管37个中心在再程放疗的临床实践中存在很大差异,但核心活动基本一致。这些发现为鼓励开展一项全国性合作研究提供了基础,以开发、实施和监测在这一具有挑战性的临床环境中再程放疗的使用。