Means Gregory, End Christopher, Kaul Prashant
Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Burnett Womack Building, 160 Dental Circle, CB 7075, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7075, USA.
Piedmont Heart Institute, 95 Collier Road, Suite 2065, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Apr;19(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0526-6.
With the recent increase in complex coronary interventions including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions and complex higher risk (and indicated) patients, the spectrum of potential periprocedural complications and their prompt management has become even more relevant. Vascular access-related problems remain the most prevalent of all PCI complications and with randomized controlled trial data from over 20,000 patients supporting the superiority of radial over femoral access in reducing bleeding and vascular complications, a default radial strategy should be promoted. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines have acknowledged this by giving a class 1 (level of evidence: A) recommendation for a radial approach for PCI. The US society guidelines, however, have thus far lagged behind. Each individual patient undergoing a PCI should be risk-stratified objectively using available risk prediction models based on patient comorbidities and anatomical and procedural complexities. Customized informed consent should therefore be provided to all patients and should include the potential risks from radiation injury. Here, we review the current data related to common periprocedural complications related to PCI.
随着近期包括针对慢性完全闭塞病变以及复杂高危(且有适应证)患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在内的复杂冠状动脉介入治疗的增加,围手术期潜在并发症及其及时处理变得更加重要。血管入路相关问题仍然是所有PCI并发症中最常见的,超过20000例患者的随机对照试验数据支持桡动脉入路在减少出血和血管并发症方面优于股动脉入路,因此应推广默认的桡动脉策略。欧洲心脏病学会指南已认可这一点,对PCI的桡动脉入路给出了I类(证据水平:A)推荐。然而,美国学会指南目前仍滞后。应使用基于患者合并症以及解剖和操作复杂性的现有风险预测模型,对每例接受PCI的患者进行客观的风险分层。因此,应向所有患者提供定制的知情同意书,其中应包括辐射损伤的潜在风险。在此,我们综述了与PCI相关的常见围手术期并发症的当前数据。