• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤扩张器治疗瘢痕的临床应用效果观察

[Observation on the clinical application effects of skin distractor on the treatment of scars].

作者信息

Gui W L, Yang E, Zhang H S

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 20;33(3):139-144. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.03.003.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.03.003
PMID:28316162
Abstract

To explore clinical application effects of skin distractor on the treatment of scars and to observe effects of skin distractor with different pull speeds on different parts scars of human body. One hundred and four patients with scars, conforming to the study criteria, were hospitalized in our unit from January 2014 to June 2015. Patients were divided into 2 mm/d group and 4 mm/d group according to the random number table, with 52 patients in each group. After admission, skin distractors were pasted on scars in face and neck, trunk, and extremities of patients in 2 groups, with inner edges of pasteboards close to outside edges of longer sides of scars. Skin distractors in 2 mm/d group and 4 mm/d group were pulled to scars axis direction as speeds of 2 mm/d and 4 mm/d, respectively. Pull time equals values of pull speeds divided by width of scars. Scars were resected after finishing pulling. Immediately after scars resection, skin distractors were pasted again with inner edges of pasteboards close to outside edges of longer sides of incision and removed when stitches were taken out. Scars of patients were scored by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used to record scores of patient scar assessment scale (PSAS), observer scar assessment scale (OSAS) and overall scores of patients and observers of scars of patients before and one year after scars resection. Data were processed with (2) test, independent samples test, paired samples test, independent samples non-parametric rank-sum test and paired samples non-parametric rank-sum test. (1) Scores of all scars of patients in 2 groups before scars resection were close (with values from -1.384 to 0.622, values above 0.05), obviously higher than those of one year post scars resection (with values from 11.085 to 24.835, values below 0.01). Scores of scars in face and neck, trunk and extremities in 2 groups before scars resection were close (with values from -1.651 to -0.035, values from -1.549 to 0.219, values above 0.05), significantly higher than those of one year post scar resection (with values from -2.992 to -2.555, values from 8.739 to 19.076, values below 0.01). (2) Scores of all scars of patients in 2 mm/d group of one year post scars resection were lower than those in 4 mm/d group (with values from -2.583 to -2.018, values below 0.05). PSAS scores of scars in face and neck and trunk in 2 mm/d group of one year post scars resection were lower than those in 4 mm/d group (with values respectively -2.385 and -2.198, values below 0.05), other scores of scars in face and neck and trunk of patients in 2 groups of one year post scars resection were close (with values from -1.841 to -0.363, values above 0.05). VSS scores, PSAS scores, OSAS scores, patients' overall scores, and observers' overall scores in 2 mm/d groups were (4.6±0.8), (28±4), (28±4), (4.7±0.7), (4.8±1.4) points, respectively, lower than those in 4 mm/d group[(5.2±0.8), (32±4), (31±6), (5.5±1.2), (5.5±1.0) points, respectively, with values from -3.712 to -2.105, <0.05 or <0.01]. Skin distractor has better effects on the treatment of scars, and treatment effects of skin distractor in extremities pulled by 2 mm/d are better than those pulled by 4 mm/d.

摘要

探讨皮肤牵张器治疗瘢痕的临床应用效果,观察不同牵拉速度的皮肤牵张器对人体不同部位瘢痕的影响。2014年1月至2015年6月,我科收治符合研究标准的瘢痕患者104例。根据随机数字表将患者分为2 mm/d组和4 mm/d组,每组52例。两组患者入院后,将皮肤牵张器粘贴于面部、颈部、躯干及四肢瘢痕处,粘贴板内缘靠近瘢痕较长边的外缘。2 mm/d组和4 mm/d组皮肤牵张器分别以2 mm/d和4 mm/d的速度向瘢痕轴心方向牵拉。牵拉时间等于牵拉速度值除以瘢痕宽度。牵拉结束后切除瘢痕。瘢痕切除后立即再次粘贴皮肤牵张器,粘贴板内缘靠近切口较长边的外缘,拆线时去除。采用温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)对患者瘢痕进行评分,采用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)记录患者瘢痕评估量表(PSAS)、观察者瘢痕评估量表(OSAS)评分及患者和观察者对患者瘢痕切除前及切除后1年瘢痕的总体评分。数据采用χ²检验、独立样本t检验、配对样本t检验、独立样本非参数秩和检验和配对样本非参数秩和检验进行处理。(1)两组患者瘢痕切除前所有瘢痕评分相近(χ²值为-1.384至0.622,P值均>0.05),明显高于瘢痕切除后1年(χ²值为11.085至24.835,P值均<0.01)。两组患者面部、颈部、躯干及四肢瘢痕切除前评分相近(χ²值为-1.651至-0.035,χ²值为-1.549至0.219,P值均>0.05),明显高于瘢痕切除后1年(χ²值为-2.992至-2.555,χ²值为8.739至19.076,P值均<0.01)。(2)瘢痕切除后1年,2 mm/d组患者所有瘢痕评分低于4 mm/d组(χ²值为-2.583至-2.018,P值<0.05)。瘢痕切除后1年,2 mm/d组患者面部、颈部及躯干瘢痕的PSAS评分低于4 mm/d组(χ²值分别为-2.385和-2.198,P值<0.05),两组患者面部、颈部及躯干瘢痕切除后1年的其他评分相近(χ²值为-1.841至-0.363,P值>0.05)。2 mm/d组VSS评分、PSAS评分、OSAS评分、患者总体评分及观察者总体评分分别为(4.6±0.8)、(28±4)、(28±4)、(4.7±0.7)、(4.8±1.4)分,低于于4 mm/d组[分别为(5.2±0.8)、(32±4)、(31±6)、(5.5±1.2)、(5.5±1.0)分,χ²值为-3.712至-2.105,P<0.05或P<0.01]。皮肤牵张器治疗瘢痕效果较好,2 mm/d牵拉四肢瘢痕的治疗效果优于4 mm/d。

相似文献

1
[Observation on the clinical application effects of skin distractor on the treatment of scars].皮肤扩张器治疗瘢痕的临床应用效果观察
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 20;33(3):139-144. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.03.003.
2
[Clinical effects of sequential laser treatments on early stage hypertrophic burn scars].序贯激光治疗对早期增生性烧伤瘢痕的临床疗效
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;34(9):615-623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.011.
3
[Clinical effects of concentrated growth factor combined with plasma albumin gel in treating facial depressed scar].浓缩生长因子联合血浆白蛋白凝胶治疗面部凹陷性瘢痕的临床效果
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 20;36(3):210-218. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190930-00389.
4
[Effect of human stromal vascular fraction gel on the treatment of patients with skin depressed scar and its mechanism].人脂肪源性基质血管成分凝胶治疗皮肤凹陷性瘢痕的效果及其机制
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 20;35(12):859-865. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.12.006.
5
[Clinical application effect of sequential nursing on the management of new skin on face and neck after deep burns].序贯护理在深度烧伤后面颈部新生皮肤管理中的临床应用效果
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 20;38(10):952-958. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210323-00101.
6
[Clinical comparative study of pulsed dye laser and ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burns].脉冲染料激光与超脉冲分次二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤后增生性瘢痕的临床对比研究
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;34(9):603-607. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.009.
7
Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.腋窝切口与乳房下皱襞切口隆胸术后瘢痕评估:中国患者的长期随访
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0671-4. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
8
[Influence of parental compliance on the treatment of hypertrophic scars in burn children].[家长依从性对烧伤儿童肥厚性瘢痕治疗的影响]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 May 20;37(5):485-489. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210127-00038.
9
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表与4分制量表在评估面部线性手术瘢痕中的可靠性
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):341-346. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13805. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
[Clinical effects of a combination treatment with narrow-spectrum intense pulsed light and fractional carbon dioxide laser on hypertrophic scar pruritus].[窄谱强脉冲光联合二氧化碳点阵激光治疗增生性瘢痕瘙痒的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;34(9):608-614. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.010.

引用本文的文献

1
[Application of skin stretcher for repair of postoperative skin and soft tissue defects in tibial fractures].皮肤牵张器在胫骨骨折术后皮肤软组织缺损修复中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 May 15;32(5):596-600. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201708072.