• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在内华达州拉斯维加斯大都市区的11所小学中,单一入口社区和死胡同是否会阻碍学生步行或骑车上学?

Are single entry communities and cul-de-sacs a barrier to active transport to school in 11 elementary schools in Las Vegas, NV metropolitan area?

作者信息

Coughenour Courtney, Clark Sheila, Singh Ashok, Huebner Joshua

机构信息

School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway box 3064, Las Vegas, NV 89154, United States.

William F. Harrah College of Hotel Administration, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway box 6021, Las Vegas, NV 89154, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2017 Feb 17;6:144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.011. eCollection 2017 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.011
PMID:28316910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5345953/
Abstract

Single entry communities (SECs) and cul-de-sacs minimize route choices and increase trip distance. Las Vegas' built environment facilitates the examination of these variables and active transport to school (ATS) rates. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of SECs and cul-de-sacs on ATS rates in Las Vegas, NV elementary children. Parental-reported data was collected from 11 elementary schools on ATS rates (n = 1217). SECs and cul-de-sacs were quantified for each school zone. Logistic regression models were used to predict ATS. 23.9% of students reported ATS all of the time and 31.4% some of the time. SECs per school zone ranged from 0 to 25 (mean = 11.9). Cul-de-sacs ranged from 12 to 315 (mean = 138.3). Some ATS use was predicted by distance from school (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.61), parental education (high school: p = 0.004;OR = 0.53, some college: p = 0.001;OR = 0.50, 4 year degree: p = 0.004;OR = 0.52) and cul-de-sacs (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.99). A separate model using distance from school (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.61), parental education (high school: p = 0.002;OR = 0.51, some college: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.45, 4 year degree: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.45) and SECs (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.96) predicted some ATS. All ATS use was predicted by distance from school (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.58), parental education (Grades 9-11: p = 0.05;OR = 0.61, high school: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.45, some college: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.41, 4 year degree: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.38) and SECs (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.97). A separate model using distance from school (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.58), parental education (Grades 9-11: p = 0.041;OR = 0.59, high school: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.47, some college: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.44, 4 year degree: p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.43) and cul-de-sacs (p ≤ 0.001;OR = 0.99) predicted all ATS. Current findings reveal that both SECs and cul-de-sacs were predictors of ATS beyond distance. Students with more SECs and cul-de-sacs in their school zone were less likely to utilize ATS.

摘要

单一入口社区(SECs)和死胡同减少了路线选择并增加了出行距离。拉斯维加斯的建筑环境有助于对这些变量以及步行或骑自行车上学(ATS)的比率进行研究。本研究的目的是调查内华达州拉斯维加斯市小学儿童所在社区的单一入口社区和死胡同对步行或骑自行车上学比率的影响。我们从11所小学收集了家长报告的关于步行或骑自行车上学比率的数据(n = 1217)。对每个学区的单一入口社区和死胡同进行了量化。使用逻辑回归模型来预测步行或骑自行车上学的情况。23.9%的学生报告他们总是步行或骑自行车上学,31.4%的学生有时会这样做。每个学区的单一入口社区数量从0到25不等(平均 = 11.9)。死胡同数量从12到315不等(平均 = 138.3)。学校距离(p≤0.001;OR = 0.61)、家长教育程度(高中:p = 0.004;OR = 0.53,部分大学学历:p = 0.001;OR = 0.50,四年制学位:p = 0.004;OR = 0.52)和死胡同数量(p≤0.001;OR = 0.99)可以预测部分步行或骑自行车上学的情况。另一个使用学校距离(p≤0.001;OR = 0.61)、家长教育程度(高中:p = 0.002;OR = 0.51,部分大学学历:p≤0.001;OR = 0.45,四年制学位:p≤0.001;OR = 0.45)和单一入口社区数量(p≤0.001;OR = 0.96)的模型也可以预测部分步行或骑自行车上学的情况。学校距离(p≤0.001;OR = 0.58)、家长教育程度(9 - 高中:p = 0.05;OR = 0.61,高中:p≤0.001;OR = 0.45,部分大学学历:p≤0.001;OR = 0.41,四年制学位:p≤0.001;OR = 0.38)和单一入口社区数量(p≤0.001;OR = 0.97)可以预测所有步行或骑自行车上学情况。另一个使用学校距离(p≤0.001;OR = 0.58)、家长教育程度(9 - 高中:p = 0.041;OR = 0.59,高中:p≤

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5f/5345953/8d6a863a72ef/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5f/5345953/8d6a863a72ef/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5f/5345953/8d6a863a72ef/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Are single entry communities and cul-de-sacs a barrier to active transport to school in 11 elementary schools in Las Vegas, NV metropolitan area?在内华达州拉斯维加斯大都市区的11所小学中,单一入口社区和死胡同是否会阻碍学生步行或骑车上学?
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Feb 17;6:144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.011. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Predictors of Active Transportation Among Safe Routes to School Participants in Arizona: Impacts of Distance and Income.亚利桑那州安全上学路线参与者中积极交通方式的预测因素:距离和收入的影响。
J Sch Health. 2022 Mar;92(3):282-292. doi: 10.1111/josh.13125. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Single Entry Communities Increase Trip Distance and May Overestimate Neighborhood Walkability.单一入口社区会增加出行距离,并且可能高估邻里的步行便利性。
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jun 16;12 Suppl 1:S46-52. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0343.
4
Active Travel to and From School Among School-Age Children During 1997-2011 and Associated Factors in China.1997-2011 年中国学龄儿童上下学的积极出行方式及相关因素。
J Phys Act Health. 2017 Sep;14(9):684-691. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0590. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
Built Environment and Active Transport to School (BEATS) Study: protocol for a cross-sectional study.建成环境与步行或骑行上学(BEATS)研究:一项横断面研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 May 24;6(5):e011196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011196.
6
Do Not Forget About Public Transportation: Analysis of the Association of Active Transportation to School Among Washington, DC Area Children With Parental Perceived Built Environment Measures.不要忘记公共交通:分析华盛顿特区地区儿童与父母感知的建成环境措施之间积极上学交通方式的关联。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Jul 1;15(7):474-482. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0266. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Individual, parental and built environmental features as influencing factors of active travel to school in northeast China: findings from a cross-sectional study.个体、父母和建成环境特征对中国东北地区学生步行上学的影响因素:一项横断面研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):e047816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047816.
8
Children's route choice during active transportation to school: difference between shortest and actual route.儿童在主动步行或骑车上学途中的路线选择:最短路线与实际路线的差异
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 12;13:48. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0373-y.
9
Active Travel to School: Findings From the Survey of US Health Behavior in School-Aged Children, 2009-2010.步行或骑行上学:2009 - 2010年美国学龄儿童健康行为调查结果
J Sch Health. 2016 Jun;86(6):464-71. doi: 10.1111/josh.12395.
10
Prevalence and correlates of walking and biking to school among adolescents.青少年步行和骑自行车上学的患病率及其相关因素。
J Community Health. 2009 Apr;34(2):129-34. doi: 10.1007/s10900-008-9135-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting active student travel: A longitudinal study.促进学生积极出行:一项纵向研究。
J Transp Geogr. 2018 Jun;70:265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Active Travel to School: Findings From the Survey of US Health Behavior in School-Aged Children, 2009-2010.步行或骑行上学:2009 - 2010年美国学龄儿童健康行为调查结果
J Sch Health. 2016 Jun;86(6):464-71. doi: 10.1111/josh.12395.
2
Using GPS Data to Study Neighborhood Walkability and Physical Activity.利用全球定位系统(GPS)数据研究邻里的步行便利性和身体活动情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Mar;50(3):e65-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.033. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
3
Patterns of Walkability, Transit, and Recreation Environment for Physical Activity.
促进身体活动的可步行性、公共交通及休闲环境模式
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):878-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
4
Socio-demographic factors and neighbourhood social cohesion influence adults' willingness to grant children greater independent mobility: A cross-sectional study.社会人口因素和邻里社会凝聚力影响成年人给予儿童更大独立出行意愿:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 22;15:690. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2053-2.
5
A century of sprawl in the United States.美国一个世纪的城市扩张。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 7;112(27):8244-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504033112. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
6
Single Entry Communities Increase Trip Distance and May Overestimate Neighborhood Walkability.单一入口社区会增加出行距离,并且可能高估邻里的步行便利性。
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jun 16;12 Suppl 1:S46-52. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0343.
7
Influence of social and built environment features on children walking to school: an observational study.社会和建成环境特征对儿童步行上学的影响:一项观察性研究。
Prev Med. 2014 Mar;60:10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
U.S. school travel, 2009 an assessment of trends.美国学校旅行,2009 年趋势评估。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.006.
9
School site and the potential to walk to school: the impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods.学校场地与步行上学的可能性:学校社区街道连通性和交通暴露对其的影响。
Health Place. 2011 Mar;17(2):545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.011. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
10
Neighborhood, route, and school environments and children's active commuting.社区、路线和学校环境与儿童积极的通勤方式。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.040.