Masters Jordan, Kocak Mehmet, Waite Aaron
From the Department of Ophthalmology (Masters, Waite), Hamilton Eye Institute, and the Department of Preventive Medicine (Kocak), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
From the Department of Ophthalmology (Masters, Waite), Hamilton Eye Institute, and the Department of Preventive Medicine (Kocak), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.022.
To compare the risk for microbial keratitis in contact lens wearers stratified by wear schedule with the risk after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
Hamilton Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Comparative metaanalysis and literature review.
An extensive literature search was performed in the PubMed database between December 2014 and July 2015. This was followed by a metaanalysis using a mixed-effects modeling approach.
After 1 year of daily soft contact lens wear, there were fewer microbial keratitis cases than after LASIK, or approximately 2 cases fewer cases per 10 000 (P = .0609). If LASIK were assumed to have essentially a 1-time risk for microbial keratitis, 5 years of extrapolation would yield 11 more cases per 10 000 with daily soft contact lens wear than with LASIK, or approximately 3 times as many cases (P < .0001). The extended use of soft contact lenses led to 12 more cases at 1 year than LASIK, or approximately 3 times as many cases (P < .0001), and 81 more cases at 5 years (P < .0001). When incorporating an estimated 10% retreatment rate for LASIK, these results changed very little.
Microbial keratitis is a relatively rare complication associated with contact lens use and LASIK postoperatively. The risk for microbial keratitis was similar between patients using contact lenses for 1 year compared with LASIK. Over time, the risk for microbial keratitis was higher for contact lens use than for LASIK, specifically with extended-wear lenses.
比较按佩戴时间表分层的隐形眼镜佩戴者发生微生物性角膜炎的风险与准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后发生该疾病的风险。
美国田纳西州孟菲斯市田纳西大学健康科学中心汉密尔顿眼科研究所及眼科系。
比较性荟萃分析及文献综述。
于2014年12月至2015年7月在PubMed数据库中进行广泛的文献检索。随后采用混合效应建模方法进行荟萃分析。
每日佩戴软性隐形眼镜1年后,微生物性角膜炎病例数少于LASIK术后,每10000例中少约2例(P = 0.0609)。如果假定LASIK本质上存在一次性微生物性角膜炎风险,那么经过5年推断,每日佩戴软性隐形眼镜的患者每10000例中发生微生物性角膜炎的病例数将比LASIK术后多11例,约为其3倍(P < 0.0001)。软性隐形眼镜长期佩戴导致1年后病例数比LASIK术后多12例,约为其3倍(P < 0.0001),5年后多81例(P < 0.0001)。纳入LASIK约10%的再次治疗率估计值后,这些结果变化甚微。
微生物性角膜炎是与隐形眼镜使用及LASIK术后相关的相对罕见的并发症。佩戴隐形眼镜1年的患者发生微生物性角膜炎的风险与LASIK术后相似。随着时间推移,隐形眼镜使用导致发生微生物性角膜炎的风险高于LASIK,特别是长期佩戴型隐形眼镜。