Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇在小肠视频胶囊内镜检查准备中的最佳应用:一项网状Meta分析。

Optimal use of polyethylene glycol for preparation of small bowel video capsule endoscopy: a network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wu Shan, Gao Yun-Jie, Ge Zhi-Zheng

机构信息

a Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine Renji Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ministry of Health , Shanghai , PR China.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jun;33(6):1149-1154. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1308922. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Standardized strategy of bowel preparation before video capsule endoscopy (VCE) remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the ideal dose of PEG, based on small bowel visualization quality (SBVQ), diagnostic yield (DY), and complete rate (CR) of VCE using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

This NMA included RCTs comparing any of the following bowel preparation interventions for VCE: fasting overnight ("Fast"), 1 liter PEG ("PEG 1L"), 2-liter PEG ("PEG 2L"), or 4-liter PEG ("PEG 4L"). The authors searched papers in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase as of June 2016. The cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities to rank different doses of PEG and Fast were used.

RESULTS

The search engine provided 102 studies. Nine RCTs including 982 patients were incorporated into this analysis. All studies showed low risk of bias of blinding. SUCRA provided an initial ranking among these strategies, in which PEG 2 L showed the best score in SBVQ (PEG 2 L, 89.4%; PEG 1 L, 62.5%; PEG 4 L, 44.0%; Fast, 4.1%) and DY (PEG 2 L, 74.6%; PEG 1 L 28.1%; PEG 4 L 65.9%; Fast 31.4%) of VCE. No significant difference was shown in the analysis of CR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study recommends PEG 2 L as the ideal dose, which may improve the SBVQ of VCE and, therefore, diagnostic accuracy. Multi-center randomized controlled trials are required to verify these findings.

摘要

目的

视频胶囊内镜检查(VCE)前肠道准备的标准化策略仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行网络荟萃分析(NMA),基于小肠可视化质量(SBVQ)、诊断率(DY)和VCE的完成率(CR)来评估聚乙二醇(PEG)的理想剂量。

方法

该NMA纳入了比较以下任何一种用于VCE的肠道准备干预措施的RCT:隔夜禁食(“禁食”)、1升PEG(“PEG 1L”)、2升PEG(“PEG 2L”)或4升PEG(“PEG 4L”)。作者检索了截至2016年6月在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase上的论文。使用累积排序(SUCRA)概率对不同剂量的PEG和禁食进行排序。

结果

搜索引擎提供了102项研究。9项RCT(包括982例患者)被纳入本分析。所有研究显示盲法偏倚风险较低。SUCRA在这些策略中给出了初步排名,其中PEG 2L在VCE的SBVQ(PEG 2L,89.4%;PEG 1L,62.5%;PEG 4L,44.0%;禁食,4.1%)和DY(PEG 2L,74.6%;PEG 1L 28.1%;PEG 4L 65.9%;禁食31.4%)方面得分最高。CR分析未显示显著差异。

结论

本研究推荐PEG 2L作为理想剂量,这可能会提高VCE的SBVQ,从而提高诊断准确性。需要多中心随机对照试验来验证这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验