Robinson Paul M, Norris Jennie, Roberts Christopher P
Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, UK.
The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, UK.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):757-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Hydrodilatation and physiotherapy are commonly used treatments for primary frozen shoulder. Little is known about the optimal form of physiotherapy. This study reports a randomized controlled trial comparing 2 forms of physiotherapy after hydrodilatation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the 2 groups at 1 year as measured by the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS).
We randomized 41 patients undergoing hydrodilatation for primary frozen shoulder into 2 treatment groups: group 1 (n = 20) underwent supervised physiotherapy in addition to a home exercise program, and group 2 (n = 21) followed a self-directed home exercise program in isolation. Assessment was carried out by a blinded research nurse at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The primary outcome measure was the OSS. Other measures were range of movement, visual analog scale pain score, and EQ-5D index.
There was no significant difference between the treatment groups at any time point as measured by the OSS or EQ-5D index. In group 1, the OSS improved significantly from 25.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.92-28.08) at baseline to 38.29 (95% CI, 34.01-42.58; P < .0001) at 4 weeks and 43.71 (95% CI, 41.61-45.80; P < .0001) at 1 year. In group 2, the OSS improved significantly from 26.60 at baseline (95% CI, 22.50-30.70) to 40.07 (95% CI, 36.77-43.36; P < .0001) at 4 weeks and 43.00 (95% CI, 39.69-46.31; P < .0001) at 1 year. All outcome measures improved significantly from baseline to 4 weeks.
In this group of patients, after a hydrodilatation procedure for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between supervised physiotherapy in addition to a home exercise program and a self-directed home exercise program in isolation.
关节腔扩张术和物理治疗是原发性冻结肩的常用治疗方法。对于物理治疗的最佳形式知之甚少。本研究报告了一项随机对照试验,比较了关节腔扩张术后两种物理治疗形式。无效假设是,根据牛津肩部评分(OSS)测量,两组在1年时无差异。
我们将41例行原发性冻结肩关节腔扩张术的患者随机分为2个治疗组:第1组(n = 20)除家庭锻炼计划外还接受监督下的物理治疗,第2组(n = 21)单独遵循自我指导的家庭锻炼计划。由一名盲法研究护士在基线、4周、3个月、6个月和1年时进行评估。主要结局指标是OSS。其他指标包括活动范围、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和EQ-5D指数。
根据OSS或EQ-5D指数测量,治疗组在任何时间点均无显著差异。在第1组中,OSS从基线时的25.00(95%置信区间[CI],21.92 - 28.08)显著改善至4周时的38.29(95%CI,34.01 - 42.58;P <.0001)和1年时的43.71(95%CI,41.61 - 45.80;P <.0001)。在第2组中,OSS从基线时的26.60(95%CI,22.50 - 30.70)显著改善至4周时的40.07(95%CI,36.77 - 43.36;P <.0001)和1年时的43.00(95%CI,39.69 - 46.31;P <.0001)。所有结局指标从基线到4周均有显著改善。
在这组患者中,对于原发性冻结肩进行关节腔扩张术后,除家庭锻炼计划外的监督下物理治疗与单独的自我指导家庭锻炼计划在临床结局上无显著差异。