• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用或不采用前部截骨术的Le Fort I型截骨术矫正前牙开牙合:哪种更稳定?

Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable?

作者信息

Ismail I N, Leung Y Y

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;46(6):766-773. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1275. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1275
PMID:28318870
Abstract

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the relapse rate of anterior open bite (AOB) correction comparing Le Fort I osteotomy with and without anterior segmentation. The risk factors that might contribute to relapse were also assessed. Lateral cephalograms obtained at six different times were analyzed. A total of 81 patients with AOB were recruited. Thirty-five patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy without anterior segmentation and 46 patients underwent anterior segmentation. Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation resulted in significantly more AOB relapse when compared to that without anterior segmentation at 7 weeks postoperative (15.2% vs. 0%, P=0.016). During the early postoperative period, factors that contributed to AOB relapse in Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation were AOB closure ≥4mm and inferior positioning of the anterior segment >2mm. Over the long term, AOB closure ≥4mm and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy as the only mandibular procedure were factors identified as causing more AOB relapse in those treated by Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation. In conclusion, Le Fort I osteotomy without anterior segmentation was found to be more stable in the surgical correction of AOB in the early and late postoperative periods.

摘要

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以分析比较有和无前部节段性切开的Le Fort I截骨术矫正前牙开(AOB)的复发率。还评估了可能导致复发的危险因素。分析了在六个不同时间获得的头颅侧位片。共招募了81例AOB患者。35例患者接受了无前部节段性切开的Le Fort I截骨术,46例患者接受了前部节段性切开。与术后7周时无前部节段性切开的情况相比,有前部节段性切开的Le Fort I截骨术导致AOB复发明显更多(15.2%对0%,P=0.016)。在术后早期,有前部节段性切开的Le Fort I截骨术中导致AOB复发的因素是AOB闭合≥4mm以及前部节段向下移位>2mm。从长期来看,AOB闭合≥4mm以及仅进行口内垂直升支截骨术作为唯一的下颌手术是在接受有前部节段性切开的Le Fort I截骨术治疗的患者中导致更多AOB复发的因素。总之,发现在术后早期和晚期,无前部节段性切开的Le Fort I截骨术在AOB手术矫正中更稳定。

相似文献

1
Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable?采用或不采用前部截骨术的Le Fort I型截骨术矫正前牙开牙合:哪种更稳定?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;46(6):766-773. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1275. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
2
Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite.口内垂直升支截骨术可使下颌前突和前牙开颌患者获得良好的长期下颌稳定性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;74(4):804-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
Three-year stability of open-bite correction by 1-piece maxillary osteotomy.采用上颌整体截骨术矫治开牙合的三年稳定性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.049.
4
Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of anterior open bite: a retrospective study.前牙开(牙合)手术正畸治疗后的骨骼和牙槽稳定性:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Orthod. 2001 Oct;23(5):547-57. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.547.
5
Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series.仅采用前路内固定的Le Fort I型截骨术的稳定性:病例系列
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;63(5):629-34. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.12.013.
6
[Evaluation for vertical stability after various orthognathic surgical treatment plans for skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion with anterior open-bite].[针对伴有前牙开颌的骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的各种正颌外科治疗方案后的垂直稳定性评估]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 1;35(5):484-488. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.05.007.
7
A comparison of Class II open bite correction by maxillary or mandibular surgery.上颌或下颌手术矫正 II 类开颌的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 May;157(5):631-640. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.018.
8
Long-term stability of anterior open bite closure corrected by surgical-orthodontic treatment.手术-正畸联合治疗前牙开颌畸形的长期稳定性。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):238-43. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq194. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
9
Segmental Maxillary Osteotomies in Conjunction With Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: Indications - Safety - Outcome.节段性上颌骨截骨术联合双颌正颌手术:适应症 - 安全性 - 结果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1422-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.051. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
Comparison of autologous and heterologous bone graft stability effects for filling maxillary bone gap after Le Fort I osteotomy.Le Fort I型截骨术后自体与异体骨移植填充上颌骨间隙的稳定性效果比较。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;24(2):341-8. doi: 10.17219/acem/40450.

引用本文的文献

1
U-Shaped Osseous Release for Le Fort 1 Osteotomy: Potential Application to Superior Repositioning.用于Le Fort 1截骨术的U形骨松解术:在上位复位中的潜在应用
J Craniofac Surg. 2024 Nov 25;36(4):1114-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010915.
2
The Stability of Anterior Open Bite Closure After Bimaxillary Osteotomy.双颌截骨术后前牙开颌关闭的稳定性
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):893-899. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01642-w. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Combined orthodontic and surgical open bite correction.正畸联合正颌手术治疗开颌畸形
Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):161-172. doi: 10.2319/101921-779.1.
4
Risk factors for anterior open bite: A case-control study.前牙开颌的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Sep 7;17(5):388-394. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
5
Correction of Malocclusion by Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection into Masticatory Muscles.咀嚼肌注射肉毒毒素矫正错颌畸形。
Toxins (Basel). 2018 Jan 2;10(1):27. doi: 10.3390/toxins10010027.