Wardenaar Klaas J, Wanders Rob B K, Ten Have Margreet, de Graaf Ron, de Jonge Peter
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jun;215:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
Researchers have tried to identify more homogeneous subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) with latent class analyses (LCA). However, this approach does no justice to the dimensional nature of psychopathology. In addition, anxiety and functioning-levels have seldom been integrated in subtyping efforts. Therefore, this study used a hybrid discrete-dimensional approach to identify subgroups with shared patterns of depressive and anxiety symptomatology, while accounting for functioning-levels.
The Comprehensive International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 1.1 was used to assess previous-year depressive and anxiety symptoms in the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-1 (NEMESIS-1; n=5583). The data were analyzed with factor analyses, LCA and hybrid mixed-measurement item response theory (MM-IRT) with and without functioning covariates. Finally, the classes' predictors (measured one year earlier) and outcomes (measured two years later) were investigated.
A 3-class MM-IRT model with functioning covariates best described the data and consisted of a 'healthy class' (74.2%) and two symptomatic classes ('sleep/energy' [13.4%]; 'mood/anhedonia' [12.4%]). Factors including older age, urbanicity, higher severity and presence of 1-year MDD predicted membership of either symptomatic class vs. the healthy class. Both symptomatic classes showed poorer 2-year outcomes (i.e. disorders, poor functioning) than the healthy class. The odds of MDD after two years were especially increased in the mood/anhedonia class.
Symptoms were assessed for the past year whereas current functioning was assessed.
Heterogeneity of depression and anxiety symptomatology are optimally captured by a hybrid discrete-dimensional subtyping model. Importantly, accounting for functioning-levels helps to capture clinically relevant interpersonal differences.
研究人员试图通过潜在类别分析(LCA)来识别重度抑郁症(MDD)更具同质性的亚型。然而,这种方法未能公正地对待精神病理学的维度性质。此外,焦虑和功能水平很少被纳入亚型分类研究中。因此,本研究采用了一种混合离散维度方法来识别具有抑郁和焦虑症状共同模式的亚组,同时考虑功能水平。
使用综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)1.1对荷兰精神健康调查与发病率研究-1(NEMESIS-1;n = 5583)中的上一年抑郁和焦虑症状进行评估。采用因子分析、LCA以及有无功能协变量的混合测量项目反应理论(MM-IRT)对数据进行分析。最后,对这些类别的预测因素(提前一年测量)和结果(两年后测量)进行研究。
带有功能协变量的3类MM-IRT模型最能描述数据,包括一个“健康类”(74.2%)和两个症状类(“睡眠/精力”[13.4%];“情绪/快感缺失”[12.4%])。年龄较大、城市化程度、更高严重程度以及存在1年MDD等因素预测了症状类与健康类的成员身份。两个症状类在2年时的结果(即疾病、功能不佳)均比健康类差。两年后MDD的几率在情绪/快感缺失类中尤其增加。
症状评估的是过去一年,而功能评估的是当前情况。
抑郁和焦虑症状的异质性通过混合离散维度亚型分类模型能得到最佳体现。重要的是,考虑功能水平有助于捕捉临床上相关的人际差异。