Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
GGZ inGeest/Department of Psychiatry and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Clinical findings indicate heterogeneity of depressive disorders, stressing the importance of subtyping depression for research and clinical care. Subtypes of the common late life depression are however seldom studied. Data-driven methods may help provide a more empirically-based classification of late-life depression.
Data were used from the Netherlands Study of Depression in Older People (NESDO) derived from 359 persons, aged 60 years or older, with a current diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify subtypes of depression, using ten CIDI-based depression items. Classes were then characterized using various sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
The most prevalent class, as identified by LCA, was a moderate-severe class (prevalence 46.5%), followed by a severe melancholic class (prevalence 38.4%), and a severe atypical class (prevalence 15.0%). The strongest distinguishing features between the three classes were appetite and weight and, to a lesser extent, psychomotor symptoms and loss of interest. Compared with the melancholic class, the severe atypical class had the highest prevalence of females, the lowest mean age, the highest BMI, and highest prevalence of both cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome.
The strongest distinguishing symptoms, appetite and weight, could be correlated. Further, only longitudinal studies could demonstrate whether the identified classes are stable on the long term.
In older persons with depressive disorders, three distinct subtypes were identified, similar to subtypes found in younger adults. The strongest distinguishing features were appetite and weight; moreover, classes differed strongly on prevalence of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. These findings suggest differences in the involvement of metabolic pathways across classes, which should be considered when investigating the pathogenesis and (eventually) treatment of depression in older persons.
临床发现表明抑郁障碍存在异质性,这强调了为研究和临床护理对抑郁症进行亚型划分的重要性。然而,常见的老年期抑郁症亚型却很少得到研究。基于数据的方法可能有助于为老年期抑郁症提供更基于经验的分类。
本研究使用了来自荷兰老年人抑郁研究(NESDO)的数据,共纳入 359 名年龄在 60 岁及以上、目前患有重性抑郁障碍的患者。使用基于 CIDI 的 10 项抑郁条目,采用潜在类别分析(LCA)来识别抑郁亚型。然后使用各种社会人口统计学和临床特征来描述这些类别。
LCA 确定的最常见类别是中重度类别(患病率为 46.5%),其次是严重忧郁症类别(患病率为 38.4%)和严重非典型类别(患病率为 15.0%)。三个类别的最强鉴别特征是食欲和体重,其次是精神运动症状和兴趣丧失。与忧郁症类别相比,严重非典型类别女性患病率最高,平均年龄最低,BMI 最高,心血管疾病和代谢综合征的患病率也最高。
最强的鉴别症状,即食欲和体重,可能存在相关性。此外,只有纵向研究才能证明所确定的类别是否在长期内稳定。
在患有抑郁障碍的老年人中,确定了三个不同的亚型,与年轻成年人中的亚型相似。最强的鉴别特征是食欲和体重;此外,这些类别在代谢综合征和心血管疾病的患病率上存在显著差异。这些发现表明,在不同的类别中,代谢途径的参与存在差异,在研究老年人抑郁的发病机制和(最终)治疗时应考虑这些差异。