• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病声望的稳定性与变化:对跨越四分之一个世纪的三项调查的比较分析。

Stability and change in disease prestige: A comparative analysis of three surveys spanning a quarter of a century.

作者信息

Album Dag, Johannessen Lars E F, Rasmussen Erik B

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1096, Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway.

Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Norway.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;180:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.020
PMID:28319909
Abstract

In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of three survey studies of disease prestige in medical culture. The studies were conducted in 1990, 2002 and 2014 using the same research design. In each of the three rounds, a sample of Norwegian physicians was asked to rate a set of 38 diseases on a scale from 1 to 9 according to the prestige they believed health personnel in general would award them. The results show a remarkable stability in the prestige rank order over 25 years. The top three diseases in all three surveys were leukaemia, brain tumour and myocardial infarction. The four lowest ranked were fibromyalgia, depressive neurosis, anxiety neurosis and hepatocirrhosis. The most notable change concerns apoplexy (brain stroke), which moved from a rank of 33 to 29 and then to 23 over the three rounds. We argue that the stable pattern, as well as this change, substantiate the interpretation of previous research, i.e. that the prestige of a disease is affected by the localization of the affected organ or body part, the effect and style of its typical treatment, and the social attributes of the typical patient. Analysing physicians' shared evaluations of different diseases, the paper contributes to the cultural understanding of disease conceptions in medicine. Understanding these conceptions is important because disease prestige may influence decision-making in the healthcare sector.

摘要

在本文中,我们对医学文化中疾病声望的三项调查研究进行了比较分析。这些研究在1990年、2002年和2014年采用相同的研究设计开展。在这三轮研究的每一轮中,都要求一组挪威医生根据他们认为医护人员总体上会赋予疾病的声望,在1到9的量表上对一组38种疾病进行评分。结果显示,在25年的时间里,疾病声望的排名顺序具有显著的稳定性。在所有三项调查中,排名前三的疾病是白血病、脑瘤和心肌梗死。排名最低的四种疾病是纤维肌痛、抑郁性神经症、焦虑性神经症和肝硬化。最显著的变化涉及中风,在三轮调查中,其排名从第33位升至第29位,然后升至第23位。我们认为,这种稳定模式以及这一变化证实了先前研究的解释,即疾病的声望受到受影响器官或身体部位的位置、其典型治疗的效果和方式以及典型患者的社会属性的影响。通过分析医生对不同疾病的共同评价,本文有助于从文化角度理解医学中的疾病概念。理解这些概念很重要,因为疾病声望可能会影响医疗保健部门的决策。

相似文献

1
Stability and change in disease prestige: A comparative analysis of three surveys spanning a quarter of a century.疾病声望的稳定性与变化:对跨越四分之一个世纪的三项调查的比较分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;180:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
2
Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students.疾病存在声誉等级之分吗?一项针对医生和医学生的调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(1):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
3
Do nurses rate diseases according to prestige? A survey study.护士是否根据声誉给疾病分级?一项调查研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jul;76(7):1691-1697. doi: 10.1111/jan.14394. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
4
[The prestige of diseases and medical specialties].[疾病与医学专科的威望]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991 Jun 30;111(17):2127-33.
5
[The prestige of illnesses and medical specialties].[疾病与医学专科的声望]
Nord Med. 1991;106(8-9):232-6.
6
[Prestige of selected medical professions in the opinion of representatives of these professions].[这些医学专业代表眼中选定医学专业的声望]
Med Pr. 2019 Sep 18;70(5):587-595. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00863. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
7
Specialty Choice Among Sexual and Gender Minorities in Medicine: The Role of Specialty Prestige, Perceived Inclusion, and Medical School Climate.医学领域中性少数群体和跨性别者的专业选择:专业声望、感知包容度和医学院校氛围的作用。
LGBT Health. 2016 Dec;3(6):451-460. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2016.0058. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
8
Prestige rankings of chronic diseases and disabilities. A survey among professionals in the disability field.慢性病与残疾的声望排名。残疾领域专业人士调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.044. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students.医学专业声望和医学生的生活方式偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Sep;71(6):1084-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.027. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
10
The narrative (re)production of prestige: how neurosurgeons teach medical students to valorise diseases.声望的叙述(再)生产:神经外科医生如何教导医学生重视疾病。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study.评估生活经验专家对虚拟实践社区中医疗服务提供者的影响:一项定性研究。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 27;5:1562651. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1562651. eCollection 2025.
2
Identification of Distinct Research Gaps that Complement Previous Critiques of Militaristic Language in Relation to Cancer and Other Non-Military Topics.识别与先前对与癌症及其他非军事主题相关的军国主义语言的批评相辅相成的不同研究空白。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251349935. doi: 10.1177/10732748251349935. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
3
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Study at National and Organizational Levels.
实施预先护理计划的障碍与促进因素:一项国家和组织层面的定性研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70131. doi: 10.1111/jep.70131.
4
'We Don't Have to Prove to People How We're Feeling': Understanding the Role of Peer Support Groups in Countering Epistemic Injustices in Long COVID at a US Centre.“我们不必向他人证明自己的感受”:在美国一个中心理解同伴支持小组在对抗长期新冠认知不公正方面的作用。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70266. doi: 10.1111/hex.70266.
5
[Prejudices, attitudes, and stereotypes of healthcare professionals towards fibromyalgia: A systematic review].[医疗保健专业人员对纤维肌痛的偏见、态度和刻板印象:一项系统综述]
Aten Primaria. 2025 Mar 13;57(9):103251. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2025.103251.
6
Knowledge and attitudes of Dutch psychiatry residents towards anorexia nervosa.荷兰精神科住院医师对神经性厌食症的认知与态度
J Eat Disord. 2025 Mar 10;13(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01227-9.
7
A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care.一个无形化的循环:对影响长期新冠护理可及性的巴西卫生系统因素的定性研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Dec 22;9(12):e017017. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017017.
8
"Low-risk" myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS): Time for a name change?“低风险”骨髓增生异常肿瘤(MDS):是时候改名了吗?
Hemasphere. 2025 Jan 7;9(1):e70066. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70066. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Listening to the voices of the medically silenced.倾听那些在医学领域被噤声者的声音。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;4(10):e0003761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003761. eCollection 2024.
10
Relevance of meeting general outpatients' information needs to their perceptions of healthcare quality in a hospital in Ghana: a Healthcare Quality Survey using modified SERVQUAL analysis.满足加纳一家医院普通门诊患者信息需求与他们对医疗质量看法的相关性:使用修正后的 SERVQUAL 分析进行的医疗质量调查。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 10;13(2):e002683. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002683.