Portocarrero Maria Esther Leiva, Giguère Anik M C, Lépine Johanie, Garvelink Mirjam M, Robitaille Hubert, Delanoë Agathe, Lévesque Isabelle, Wilson Brenda J, Rousseau François, Légaré France
Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Centre d'Excellence sur le Vieillissement de Québec, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1273-0.
Patient decision aids (PtDAs) help people make difficult, values-sensitive decisions. Prenatal screening for assessing the risk of genetic conditions in the fetus is one such decision and patient decision aids are rarely used in this clinical context. We sought to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a patient decision aid for deciding about prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS).
This qualitative study was embedded in a sequential mixed-methods research program whose main aim is to implement shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of prenatal screening for DS in the province of Quebec, Canada. We planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancy consulting for prenatal care at three clinical sites. Participating women watched a video depicting a prenatal care follow-up during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA to decide about prenatal screening for DS. The women were then interviewed about factors that would influence the use of this PtDA using questions based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We performed content analysis of transcribed verbatim interviews.
Out of 216 eligible women, 100 agreed to participate (46% response rate) and 46 were interviewed. Regarding the type of health professional responsible for their prenatal care, 19 participants (41%) reported having made a decision about prenatal screening for DS with an obstetrician-gynecologist, 13 (28%) with a midwife, 12 (26%) with a family physician, and two (4%) decided on their own. We identified 54 factors that were mapped onto nine of the 12 TDF domains. The three most frequently-mentioned were: opinion of the pregnant woman's partner (n = 33, 72%), presentation of the PtDA by health professional and a discussion (n = 27, 72%), and not having encountered a PtDA (n = 26, 57%).
This study allowed us to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a PtDA for prenatal screening for DS. Use of a PtDA by health professionals and patients is one step in providing the needed decision support and our study results will allow us to design an effective implementation strategy for PtDAs for prenatal screening for DS.
患者决策辅助工具(PtDAs)有助于人们做出艰难的、涉及价值观的决策。评估胎儿遗传疾病风险的产前筛查就是这样一种决策,而患者决策辅助工具在这种临床背景下很少被使用。我们试图确定影响孕妇使用患者决策辅助工具来决定唐氏综合征(DS)产前筛查的因素。
这项定性研究嵌入了一个序贯混合方法研究项目,其主要目的是在加拿大魁北克省DS产前筛查的背景下实施共同决策(SDM)。我们计划在三个临床地点招募45名低风险妊娠并咨询产前护理的孕妇作为目的抽样样本。参与的女性观看了一段视频,视频描绘了一次产前护理随访过程,其中一名孕妇、她的伴侣和一名健康专业人员使用患者决策辅助工具来决定DS的产前筛查。然后,使用基于理论领域框架(TDF)的问题,就会影响该患者决策辅助工具使用的因素对这些女性进行访谈。我们对逐字转录的访谈进行了内容分析。
在216名符合条件的女性中,100名同意参与(回应率为46%),46名接受了访谈。关于负责其产前护理的健康专业人员类型,19名参与者(41%)报告称已与妇产科医生就DS产前筛查做出决定,13名(28%)与助产士,12名(26%)与家庭医生,2名(4%)自行做出决定。我们确定了54个因素,这些因素被映射到12个TDF领域中的9个。最常提到的三个因素是:孕妇伴侣的意见(n = 33,72%)、健康专业人员对患者决策辅助工具的介绍及讨论(n = 27,72%)以及未曾遇到过患者决策辅助工具(n = 26,57%)。
本研究使我们能够确定影响孕妇使用患者决策辅助工具进行DS产前筛查的因素。健康专业人员和患者使用患者决策辅助工具是提供所需决策支持的一步,我们的研究结果将使我们能够为DS产前筛查设计一种有效的患者决策辅助工具实施策略。