Wood Karen, Lawrence Maggie, Jani Bhautesh, Simpson Robert, Mercer Stewart W
General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX, Scotland, UK.
Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Health and Life Sciences Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, Scotland, UK.
BMC Neurol. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0832-3.
Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly used to help patients cope with physical and mental long-term conditions (LTCs). Epilepsy is associated with a range of mental and physical comorbidities that have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QOL), but it is not clear whether MBIs can help. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effectiveness of MBIs in people with epilepsy.
Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, Allied and Complimentary Medicine Database, and PsychInfo were searched in March 2016. These databases were searched using a combination of subject headings where available and keywords in the title and abstracts. We also searched the reference lists of related reviews. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool.
Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 231 participants were included. The interventions were tested in the USA (n = 171) and China (Hong Kong) (n = 60). Significant improvements were reported in depression symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, and depression knowledge and skills. Two of the included studies were assessed as being at unclear/high risk of bias - with randomisation and allocation procedures, as well as adverse events and reasons for drop-outs poorly reported. There was no reporting on intervention costs/benefits or how they affected health service utilisation.
This systematic review found limited evidence for the effectiveness of MBIs in epilepsy, however preliminary evidence suggests it may lead to some improvement in anxiety, depression and quality of life. Further trials with larger sample sizes, active control groups and longer follow-ups are needed before the evidence for MBIs in epilepsy can be conclusively determined.
基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)越来越多地用于帮助患者应对身心长期病症(LTCs)。癫痫与一系列对生活质量(QOL)有不利影响的身心合并症相关,但尚不清楚MBIs是否有帮助。我们系统回顾了文献,以确定MBIs对癫痫患者的有效性。
2016年3月检索了Medline、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、EMBASE、CINAHL、联合与补充医学数据库以及PsychInfo。这些数据库通过结合使用可用的主题词以及标题和摘要中的关键词进行检索。我们还检索了相关综述的参考文献列表。使用Cochrane协作偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。
纳入了三项随机对照试验(RCTs),共231名参与者。干预措施在美国(n = 171)和中国香港(n = 60)进行了测试。报告显示抑郁症状、生活质量、焦虑以及抑郁知识和技能有显著改善。纳入的两项研究被评估为存在不清楚/高偏倚风险——随机化和分配程序以及不良事件和退出原因报告不佳。没有关于干预成本/效益或它们如何影响卫生服务利用的报告。
这项系统综述发现MBIs对癫痫有效性的证据有限,然而初步证据表明它可能会使焦虑、抑郁和生活质量有所改善。在能够最终确定MBIs对癫痫的证据之前,需要进行更大样本量、有活性对照组和更长随访期的进一步试验。