Laktabai Jeremiah, Lesser Adriane, Platt Alyssa, Maffioli Elisa, Mohanan Manoj, Menya Diana, Prudhomme O'Meara Wendy, Turner Elizabeth L
Moi School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e013972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013972.
There are concerns of inappropriate use of subsidised antimalarials due to the large number of fevers treated in the informal sector with minimal access to diagnostic testing. Targeting antimalarial subsidies to confirmed malaria cases can lead to appropriate, effective therapy. There is evidence that community health volunteers (CHVs) can be trained to safely and correctly use rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). This study seeks to evaluate the public health impact of targeted antimalarial subsidies delivered through a partnership between CHVs and the private retail sector.
We are conducting a stratified cluster-randomised controlled trial in Western Kenya where 32 community units were randomly assigned to the intervention or control (usual care) arm. In the intervention arm, CHVs offer free RDT testing to febrile individuals and, conditional on a positive test result, a voucher to purchase a WHO-qualified artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) at a reduced fixed price in the retail sector.Study outcomes in individuals with a febrile illness in the previous 4 weeks will be ascertained through population-based cross-sectional household surveys at four time points: baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months postbaseline. The primary outcome is the proportion of fevers that receives a malaria test from any source (CHV or health facility). The main secondary outcome is the proportion of ACTs used by people with a malaria-positive test. Other secondary outcomes include: the proportion of ACTs used by people without a test and adherence to test results.
The protocol has been approved by the National Institutes of Health, the Moi University School of Medicine Institutional Research and Ethics Committee and the Duke University Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Findings will be reported on clinicalstrials.gov, in peer-reviewed publications and through stakeholder meetings including those with the Kenyan Ministry of Health.
Pre-results, NCT02461628.
由于在非正规部门治疗的发热病例众多且几乎无法获得诊断检测,人们担心补贴抗疟药的使用不当。将抗疟药补贴目标对准确诊的疟疾病例可实现恰当、有效的治疗。有证据表明,社区卫生志愿者(CHV)可接受培训以安全、正确地使用快速诊断检测(RDT)。本研究旨在评估通过CHV与私营零售部门合作提供的有针对性的抗疟药补贴对公共卫生的影响。
我们正在肯尼亚西部进行一项分层整群随机对照试验,将32个社区单位随机分配至干预组或对照组(常规护理组)。在干预组中,CHV为发热个体提供免费RDT检测,若检测结果为阳性,则提供一张代金券,以便在零售部门以固定低价购买世界卫生组织认可的青蒿素联合疗法(ACT)。将通过在四个时间点(基线、基线后6个月、12个月和18个月)进行的基于人群的横断面家庭调查,确定前4周内患有发热疾病个体的研究结果。主要结局是从任何来源(CHV或医疗机构)接受疟疾检测的发热病例比例。主要次要结局是检测结果为疟疾阳性者使用ACT的比例。其他次要结局包括:未进行检测者使用ACT的比例以及对检测结果的依从性。
该方案已获得美国国立卫生研究院、莫伊大学医学院机构研究与伦理委员会以及杜克大学医学中心机构审查委员会的批准。研究结果将在clinicaltrials.gov上报告,在同行评审出版物中发表,并通过包括与肯尼亚卫生部举行的会议在内的利益相关者会议公布。
结果前,NCT02461628。