Brietzke Scott E, Ishman Stacey L, Cohen Seth, Cyr Derek D, Shin Jennifer J, Kezirian Eric J
1 Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
2 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May;156(5):955-961. doi: 10.1177/0194599817696503. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
Objective Recent evidence suggests that multilevel sleep surgery improves outcomes when compared with palate surgery alone for most patients. The study objective was to compare demographic and outcomes data for palate surgery (uvulopalatopharyngoplasty [UPPP]) alone versus multilevel surgery through a national insurance claims database. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting National insurance claims database. Subjects and Methods An adult cohort undergoing single-level UPPP versus UPPP with nasal and/or tongue/hypopharyngeal surgery was identified in the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Databases for the years 2010 through 2012. Demographic and outcomes data were assessed at short-term (≤14 days), intermediate (15-60 days), and long-term (61-183 days) intervals via a multivariate regression model adjusted for age, sex, geographic region, insurance type, and the Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. The primary long-term complication considered was positive airway pressure (PAP) equipment supply, implying possible treatment failure. Results The cohort included 14,633 patients: 7559 (51.6%), UPPP alone; 5219 (35.7%), UPPP + nasal surgery; 1164 (7.95%), UPPP + tongue/hypopharyngeal surgery; and 691 (4.7%), UPPP + nasal + tongue/hypopharyngeal surgery. Demographic data were similar among the groups. UPPP alone had lower rates of postoperative bleeding than UPPP + tongue/hypopharyngeal surgery (4.31% vs 6.19%, P = .004). Multivariate modeling indicated that the addition of either nasal surgery (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.10-1.34, P < .001) or tongue/hypopharyngeal surgery (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.00-1.32, P = .048) to UPPP was associated with increased odds of postoperative continuous positive airway pressure. Conclusions UPPP alone is currently the predominant form of sleep surgery in the United States. Multilevel surgery had greater odds of postoperative bleeding and positive airway pressure equipment supply than UPPP alone. Dedicated studies formally evaluating single- versus multilevel sleep surgery and the impact of possible surgeon/patient selection bias should be a priority.
目的 近期证据表明,对于大多数患者而言,与单纯腭部手术相比,多平面睡眠手术能改善治疗效果。本研究的目的是通过国家保险索赔数据库,比较单纯腭部手术(悬雍垂腭咽成形术[UPPP])与多平面手术的人口统计学和治疗效果数据。
研究设计 回顾性队列研究。
研究背景 国家保险索赔数据库。
研究对象与方法 在2010年至2012年的Truven Health Analytics MarketScan研究数据库中,确定了接受单平面UPPP手术与接受UPPP联合鼻腔和/或舌/下咽手术的成年队列。通过多变量回归模型,在短期(≤14天)、中期(15 - 60天)和长期(61 - 183天)时间间隔内,评估人口统计学和治疗效果数据,该模型对年龄、性别、地理区域、保险类型和Charlson - Deyo合并症评分进行了调整。所考虑的主要长期并发症是气道正压(PAP)设备供应,这意味着可能治疗失败。
结果 该队列包括14,633名患者:7559名(51.6%)接受单纯UPPP手术;5219名(35.7%)接受UPPP + 鼻腔手术;1164名(7.95%)接受UPPP + 舌/下咽手术;691名(4.7%)接受UPPP + 鼻腔 + 舌/下咽手术。各组之间的人口统计学数据相似。单纯UPPP手术的术后出血率低于UPPP + 舌/下咽手术(4.31%对6.19%,P = 0.004)。多变量建模表明,在UPPP手术基础上增加鼻腔手术(比值比 = 1.21,95%可信区间 = 1.10 - 1.34,P < 0.001)或舌/下咽手术(比值比 = 1.15,95%可信区间 = 1.00 - 1.32,P = 0.048)与术后持续气道正压的几率增加相关。
结论 目前在美国,单纯UPPP手术是睡眠手术的主要形式。与单纯UPPP手术相比,多平面手术术后出血和气道正压设备供应的几率更高。正式评估单平面与多平面睡眠手术以及可能的外科医生/患者选择偏倚影响的专门研究应成为优先事项。