• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问卷改编:小改变意义重大。

Questionnaire Adapting: Little Changes Mean a Lot.

作者信息

Sousa Vanessa E C, Matson Jeffrey, Dunn Lopez Karen

机构信息

1 University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 2017 Sep;39(9):1289-1300. doi: 10.1177/0193945916678212. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1177/0193945916678212
PMID:28322671
Abstract

Questionnaire development involves rigorous testing to ensure reliability and validity. Due to time and cost constraints of developing new questionnaires, researchers often adapt existing questionnaires to better fit the purpose of their study. However, the effect of such adaptations is unclear. We conducted cognitive interviews as a method to evaluate the understanding of original and adapted questionnaire items to be applied in a future study. The findings revealed that all subjects (a) comprehended the original and adapted items differently, (b) changed their scores after comparing the original to the adapted items, and (c) were unanimous in stating that the adapted items were easier to understand. Cognitive interviewing allowed us to assess the interpretation of adapted items in a useful and efficient manner before use in data collection.

摘要

问卷开发需要进行严格测试以确保可靠性和有效性。由于开发新问卷存在时间和成本限制,研究人员通常会对现有问卷进行调整,以更好地符合他们的研究目的。然而,这种调整的效果尚不清楚。我们进行了认知访谈,以此作为一种方法来评估对原始问卷项目和调整后问卷项目的理解,以便应用于未来的研究。研究结果显示,所有受试者(a)对原始项目和调整后项目的理解不同,(b)在将原始项目与调整后项目进行比较后改变了他们的分数,并且(c)一致表示调整后的项目更容易理解。认知访谈使我们能够在将调整后的项目用于数据收集之前,以有用且高效的方式评估其解读情况。

相似文献

1
Questionnaire Adapting: Little Changes Mean a Lot.问卷改编:小改变意义重大。
West J Nurs Res. 2017 Sep;39(9):1289-1300. doi: 10.1177/0193945916678212. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
2
The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development.用于量表开发的认知访谈的分析与解读
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Apr;30(2):224-34. doi: 10.1002/nur.20195.
3
Development and validation of a novel patient-reported treatment satisfaction measure for hyperfunctional facial lines: facial line satisfaction questionnaire.一种用于治疗面部功能亢进性皱纹的新型患者报告治疗满意度测量工具的开发与验证:面部皱纹满意度问卷
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Dec;14(4):274-85. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12166. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
4
Role of cognitive testing in the development of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.认知测试在CAHPS医院调查发展中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2037-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00472.x.
5
Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ): Development and Validation.患者报告的摆脱眼镜依赖问卷(PRSIQ):编制与验证
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;178:101-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
Measuring the quality of care related to pain management: a multiple-method approach to instrument development.测量与疼痛管理相关的医疗服务质量:一种仪器开发的多方法途径。
Nurs Res. 2010 Mar-Apr;59(2):85-92. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181d1a732.
7
A new scale for disaster nursing core competencies: Development and psychometric testing.灾难护理核心能力的新量表:开发与心理测量测试。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016 Feb;19(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Effective questionnaire design: How to use cognitive interviews to refine questionnaire items.有效的问卷设计:如何运用认知访谈来完善问卷项目。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2022;15(2):345-349. doi: 10.3233/NPM-210848.
9
Use of cognitive interviewing to adapt measurement instruments for low-literate Hispanics.运用认知访谈法对低文化程度的西班牙裔人群的测量工具进行调整。
Diabetes Educ. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):1006-17. doi: 10.1177/014572170302900611.
10
[Adaptation of a questionnaire measuring representations related to work disability].[一份测量与工作残疾相关认知的问卷的改编]
Encephale. 2013 Jun;39(3):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The inquiry of the learning support index connotation of adults with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍成年人学习支持指数内涵探究
Int J Dev Disabil. 2023 Dec 6;71(4):626-637. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2266624. eCollection 2025.
2
Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research.在护理研究中确定用于开发和验证问卷的合适样本量。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Oct 28;7(5):356-360. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1927. eCollection 2021.
3
Grouped data with survey revision.分组数据与调查修订。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 16;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01834-7.
4
Prevalence of Dental Fear and Anxiety and Its Triggering Factors in the Dental Office among School-going Children in Al Ahsa.阿赫萨地区学龄儿童在牙科诊所的牙科恐惧和焦虑患病率及其触发因素
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):286-292. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1925.
5
Towards Usable E-Health. A Systematic Review of Usability Questionnaires.迈向可用的电子健康。可用性问卷的系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 May 10;8(2):470-490. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-10-R-0170.