Suppr超能文献

标准刺激方案后昏迷患者中刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作性放电——连续脑电图的发生率及评分者间信度:一项前瞻性研究

Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges in Coma-Incidence and Interrater Reliability of Continuous EEG After a Standard Stimulation Protocol: A Prospective Study.

作者信息

Alsherbini Khalid A, Plancher Joao Mc-OʼNeil, Ficker David M, Foreman Brandon P, Adeoye Opeolu M, Ying Jun, Privitera Michael D

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center and Neurocritical Care Program at UC Neuroscience Institute, University of Cincinnati (UC) College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.

出版信息

J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul;34(4):375-380. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000374.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) are often seen during continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring in coma. Given their uncertain clinical significance, our prospective study evaluated incidence of SIRPIDs in comatose patients in the neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) who underwent a standard stimulation protocol and defined interreader reliability for cEEG.

METHODS

Of 146 patients prospectively screened who underwent cEEG during a 6-month period, 53 patients were included and 93 patients were excluded. Our protocol used a sequence of auditory, mild tactile, and painful stimuli tested in a quiet room. Continuous electroencephalogram were then reviewed offline by blinded experts, with interrater agreement assessed by kappa statistic. By Pearson χ and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, we then compared binary and numerical clinical features between those with and without SIRPIDs.

RESULTS

Of 53 patients who underwent our protocol, one patient with a corrupt cEEG file was excluded. Traumatic brain injury was the most common diagnosis. Moderate interrater agreement was observed for 66 total stimulations: 20 patients (38.5%) had possible or definite SIRPIDs by minimum one reviewer. For 19 stimulations reviewed by a third reviewer, consensus was reached in 10 cases making the incidence of SIRPIDs 19.3% in our cohort. There was a moderate interrate agreement with kappa of 0.5 (95% confidence interval: 0.1, 0.7). Median intensive care unit stay was 15 days in patients with SIRPIDs versus 6.5 days in those without (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective study of SIRPIDs in the neuroscience intensive care unit found a 19% incidence by cEEG using a standard stimulation protocol, most often rhythmic delta activity, and showed a moderate interrater agreement.

摘要

目的

在昏迷患者的连续脑电图(cEEG)监测过程中,常可见刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作性放电(SIRPIDs)。鉴于其临床意义尚不明确,我们的前瞻性研究评估了神经科学重症监护病房(NSICU)中接受标准刺激方案的昏迷患者SIRPIDs的发生率,并确定了cEEG的阅片者间可靠性。

方法

在6个月期间前瞻性筛查的146例接受cEEG检查的患者中,53例被纳入研究,93例被排除。我们的方案采用一系列听觉、轻度触觉和疼痛刺激,在安静的房间内进行测试。然后由不知情的专家离线复查连续脑电图,通过kappa统计量评估阅片者间的一致性。通过Pearson χ检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验,我们比较了有和没有SIRPIDs患者的二元和数值临床特征。

结果

在接受我们方案的53例患者中,1例cEEG文件损坏的患者被排除。创伤性脑损伤是最常见的诊断。在总共66次刺激中观察到中等程度的阅片者间一致性:至少有一名阅片者认为20例患者(38.5%)可能或肯定有SIRPIDs。在由第三位阅片者复查的19次刺激中,10例达成了共识,使我们队列中SIRPIDs的发生率为19.3%。kappa值为0.5,有中等程度的阅片者间一致性(95%置信区间:0.1, 0.7)。有SIRPIDs的患者在重症监护病房的中位住院时间为15天,而没有SIRPIDs的患者为6.5天(P = 0.021)。

结论

我们在神经科学重症监护病房对SIRPIDs进行的前瞻性研究发现,使用标准刺激方案通过cEEG检测到的SIRPIDs发生率为19%,最常见的是节律性δ活动,并显示出中等程度的阅片者间一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验