Bornemann Rahel, Jansen Tom R, Kabir Koroush, Pennekamp Peter H, Stüwe Brit, Wirtz Dieter C, Pflugmacher Robert
Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Apr;30(3):E247-E251. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000050.
A retrospective study.
The aim of this study was the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation (RF-TVA) in comparison with balloon kyphoplasty (BK) for the treatment of acute painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) on the basis of matched pairs.
Vertebroplasty and BK are the common surgical interventions for the treatment of VCF. Both are effective and safe but pose some risks such as adjacent fractures and cement leakage. In 2009, RF-TVA was introduced as an innovative augmentation procedure for the treatment of VCF.
A total of 192 patients (116 female; 51-90 y) with VCF (n=303) at 1 to 3 levels were treated with RF-TVA or BK. Functionality (Oswestry Disability Index), pain (visual analogue scale), vertebral height (anterior, middle), and kyphotic angle were evaluated over a 2-year period (postoperatively, 3-4 d, 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo). In addition, operating time and occurrence of cement leakage were recorded.
Pain and functionality were significantly improved after both treatments. In both groups, there was an increase in the vertebral height and a decrease in the kyphotic angle, which remained relatively consistent during 24 months. The incidence of cement leakage was 9.4% (n=9) in the RF-TVA group and 24.0% (n=25) in the BK group. The mean operating time with radiofrequency kyphoplasty was 25.9±9.9 minutes, and with balloon kyphoplasty 48.0±18.4 minutes.
RF-TVA is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures when compared with BK. Improvement in pain and functional scores after RF-TVA are durable through 24 months postprocedure and remained better than those after BK at long-term follow-up. Operating time for RF-TVA is shorter and the risk of cement leakage is lower. Both procedures provided similar results in vertebral height restoration and reduction in the kyphotic angle.
一项回顾性研究。
本研究旨在基于配对比较评估射频靶向椎体强化术(RF-TVA)与球囊后凸成形术(BK)治疗急性疼痛性椎体压缩骨折(VCF)的安全性和有效性。
椎体成形术和BK是治疗VCF的常见手术干预措施。两者均有效且安全,但存在一些风险,如邻近椎体骨折和骨水泥渗漏。2009年,RF-TVA作为一种治疗VCF的创新强化手术被引入。
共有192例1至3个节段VCF患者(116例女性;年龄51 - 90岁)接受了RF-TVA或BK治疗。在2年期间(术后、术后3 - 4天、3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月)评估功能(Oswestry功能障碍指数)、疼痛(视觉模拟评分)、椎体高度(前部、中部)和后凸角。此外,记录手术时间和骨水泥渗漏的发生情况。
两种治疗后疼痛和功能均有显著改善。两组椎体高度均增加,后凸角均减小,且在24个月内保持相对稳定。RF-TVA组骨水泥渗漏发生率为9.4%(n = 9),BK组为24.0%(n = 25)。射频后凸成形术的平均手术时间为25.9±9.9分钟,球囊后凸成形术为48.0±18.4分钟。
与BK相比,RF-TVA是一种治疗椎体压缩骨折的安全有效的方法。RF-TVA术后24个月内疼痛和功能评分持续改善,长期随访时仍优于BK术后。RF-TVA手术时间更短,骨水泥渗漏风险更低。两种手术在恢复椎体高度和减小后凸角方面效果相似。