Søndergaard Esben, Espinosa De Ycaza Ana Elena, Morgan-Bathke Maria, Jensen Michael D
Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Apr 1;102(4):1193-1199. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00047.
Adipose tissue insulin resistance may cause hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance by releasing excess free fatty acids (FFAs). Because no consensus exists on how to quantify adipose tissue insulin sensitivity we compared three methods for measuring adipose tissue insulin sensitivity: the single step insulin clamp, the multistep pancreatic clamp, and the adipose tissue insulin resistance index (Adipo-IR).
We studied insulin sensitivity in 25 adults by measuring the insulin concentration resulting in 50% suppression of palmitate flux (IC50) using both a multistep pancreatic clamp and a one-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Palmitate kinetics were measured using a continuous infusion of [U-13C]palmitate. Adipo-IR was calculated from fasting insulin and fasting FFA concentrations.
Adipo-IR was reproducible (sample coefficient of variability, 10.0%) and correlated with the IC50 measured by the multistep pancreatic clamp technique (r, 0.86; P < 0.001). Age and physical fitness were significant predictors of the residual variation between Adipo-IR and IC50, with a positive relationship with age (r, 0.47; P = 0.02) and a negative association with VO2 peak (r, -0.46; P = 0.02). Likewise, IC50 measured by the multistep pancreatic clamp technique correlated with IC50 measured using the one-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique (r, 0.73; P < 0.001).
Adipo-IR and the one-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique using a palmitate tracer are good predictors of a gold standard measure of adipose tissue insulin sensitivity. However, age and physical fitness systematically affect the predictive values. Although Adipo-IR is suitable for larger population studies, the multistep pancreatic clamp technique is probably needed for mechanistic studies of adipose tissue insulin action.
脂肪组织胰岛素抵抗可能通过释放过量游离脂肪酸(FFA)导致肝脏和骨骼肌胰岛素抵抗。由于在如何量化脂肪组织胰岛素敏感性方面尚未达成共识,我们比较了三种测量脂肪组织胰岛素敏感性的方法:单步胰岛素钳夹法、多步胰腺钳夹法和脂肪组织胰岛素抵抗指数(Adipo-IR)。
我们通过使用多步胰腺钳夹法和单步高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹法测量导致棕榈酸通量50%抑制的胰岛素浓度(IC50),研究了25名成年人的胰岛素敏感性。使用连续输注[U-13C]棕榈酸来测量棕榈酸动力学。根据空腹胰岛素和空腹FFA浓度计算Adipo-IR。
Adipo-IR具有可重复性(样本变异系数为10.0%),并与多步胰腺钳夹技术测量的IC50相关(r = 0.86;P < 0.001)。年龄和身体素质是Adipo-IR与IC50之间残余变异的显著预测因素,与年龄呈正相关(r = 0.47;P = 0.02),与最大摄氧量呈负相关(r = -0.46;P = 0.02)。同样,多步胰腺钳夹技术测量的IC50与使用单步高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹技术测量的IC50相关(r = 0.73;P < 0.001)。
Adipo-IR和使用棕榈酸示踪剂的单步高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹技术是脂肪组织胰岛素敏感性金标准测量的良好预测指标。然而,年龄和身体素质会系统性地影响预测值。虽然Adipo-IR适用于大规模人群研究,但脂肪组织胰岛素作用的机制研究可能需要多步胰腺钳夹技术。