1 Department of Pediatrics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jun;14(6):937-942. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-615OC.
Children with cystic fibrosis often experience acute declines in lung function. We previously showed that such declines are not always treated with antibiotics, but we did not assess whether treatment improves the likelihood of recovery.
To determine whether new antibiotic treatment was associated with recovery from acute FEV decline.
We studied episodes of FEV decline (≥10% from baseline) in the Epidemiologic Study of Cystic Fibrosis. Treatments were hospitalization, home intravenous antibiotic, new inhaled oral quinolone, or other oral antibiotic. We used logistic regression to evaluate whether treatment was associated with recovery to baseline or near baseline.
Logistic regression of 9,875 patients showed that new antibiotic treatment was associated with an increased likelihood of recovery to 90% of baseline (P < 0.001), especially for hospitalization compared with no new antibiotic (odds ratio [OR], 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-3.23). All four outpatient treatments were associated with greater likelihood of recovery compared with no treatment (OR, 1.27-1.64). Inpatient treatment was better than outpatient treatment (OR, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-2.23). Treatment-type ORs were similar across recovery criteria and levels of baseline lung function.
New antibiotic therapy, and especially inpatient treatment, is associated with greater likelihood of recovery after acute decline in FEV. Benefits extend across all disease stages and are especially important in patients with high lung function, who are at greatest risk for FEV decline.
患有囊性纤维化的儿童常经历肺功能的急性下降。我们先前表明,并非所有此类下降都用抗生素治疗,但我们并未评估治疗是否能提高恢复的可能性。
确定新的抗生素治疗是否与急性 FEV 下降的恢复相关。
我们研究了囊性纤维化的流行病学研究中的 FEV 下降(较基线下降≥10%)的发作。治疗包括住院治疗、家庭静脉内抗生素治疗、新的吸入性口服喹诺酮类药物治疗或其他口服抗生素治疗。我们使用逻辑回归评估治疗是否与恢复至基线或接近基线相关。
对 9875 例患者的逻辑回归显示,新的抗生素治疗与恢复至基线 90%的可能性增加相关(P<0.001),特别是与未用新抗生素相比(比值比 [OR],2.79;95%置信区间,2.41-3.23)。与未治疗相比,所有四种门诊治疗都与更大的恢复可能性相关(OR,1.27-1.64)。住院治疗优于门诊治疗(OR,1.94;95%置信区间,1.68-2.23)。在所有恢复标准和基线肺功能水平上,治疗类型的 OR 相似。
急性 FEV 下降后,新的抗生素治疗,特别是住院治疗,与更大的恢复可能性相关。益处跨越所有疾病阶段,对肺功能较高的患者尤其重要,这些患者发生 FEV 下降的风险最大。