Suppr超能文献

考虑两轮混合交通流,识别影响路中自行车道安全性的因素。

Identifying factors affecting the safety of mid-block bicycle lanes considering mixed 2-wheeled traffic flow.

作者信息

Bai Lu, Chan Ching-Yao, Liu Pan, Xu Chengcheng

机构信息

a Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies , Southeast University , Nanjing , China.

b California PATH, University of California at Berkeley , Richmond , California.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):761-766. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1303681. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Electric bikes (e-bikes) have been one of the fastest growing trip modes in Southeast Asia over the past 2 decades. The increasing popularity of e-bikes raised some safety concerns regarding urban transport systems. The primary objective of this study was to identify whether and how the generalized linear regression model (GLM) could be used to relate cyclists' safety with various contributing factors when riding in a mid-block bike lane. The types of 2-wheeled vehicles in the study included bicycle-style electric bicycles (BSEBs), scooter-style electric bicycles (SSEBs), and regular bicycles (RBs).

METHODS

Traffic conflict technology was applied as a surrogate measure to evaluate the safety of 2-wheeled vehicles. The safety performance model was developed by adopting a generalized linear regression model for relating the frequency of rear-end conflicts between e-bikes and regular bikes to the operating speeds of BSEBs, SSEBs, and RBs in mid-block bike lanes.

RESULTS

The frequency of rear-end conflicts between e-bikes and bikes increased with an increase in the operating speeds of e-bikes and the volume of e-bikes and bikes and decreased with an increase in the width of bike lanes. The large speed difference between e-bikes and bikes increased the frequency of rear-end conflicts between e-bikes and bikes in mid-block bike lanes. A 1% increase in the average operating speed of e-bikes would increase the expected number of rear-end conflicts between e-bikes and bikes by 1.48%. A 1% increase in the speed difference between e-bikes and bikes would increase the expected number of rear-end conflicts between e-bikes/bikes by 0.16%.

CONCLUSIONS

The conflict frequency in mid-block bike lanes can be modeled using generalized linear regression models. The factors that significantly affected the frequency of rear-end conflicts included the operating speeds of e-bikes, the speed difference between e-bikes and regular bikes, the volume of e-bikes, the volume of bikes, and the width of bike lanes. The safety performance model can help better understand the causes of crash occurrences in mid-block bike lanes.

摘要

目的

在过去20年里,电动自行车(以下简称“电动车”)已成为东南亚地区增长最快的出行方式之一。电动车日益普及引发了一些关于城市交通系统的安全担忧。本研究的主要目的是确定广义线性回归模型(GLM)是否以及如何用于关联在街区中间自行车道骑行时骑车人的安全与各种影响因素。本研究中的两轮车辆类型包括自行车式电动自行车(BSEB)、踏板车式电动自行车(SSEB)和普通自行车(RB)。

方法

采用交通冲突技术作为替代指标来评估两轮车辆的安全性。通过采用广义线性回归模型建立安全性能模型,将电动自行车与普通自行车之间追尾冲突的频率与街区中间自行车道上BSEB、SSEB和RB的运行速度相关联。

结果

电动自行车与普通自行车之间追尾冲突的频率随着电动自行车运行速度、电动自行车和普通自行车数量的增加而增加,随着自行车道宽度的增加而降低。电动自行车与普通自行车之间较大的速度差增加了街区中间自行车道上电动自行车与普通自行车之间追尾冲突的频率。电动自行车平均运行速度每增加1%,电动自行车与普通自行车之间追尾冲突的预期数量将增加1.48%。电动自行车与普通自行车之间速度差每增加1%,电动自行车/普通自行车之间追尾冲突的预期数量将增加0.16%。

结论

街区中间自行车道的冲突频率可以用广义线性回归模型进行建模。显著影响追尾冲突频率的因素包括电动自行车的运行速度、电动自行车与普通自行车之间的速度差、电动自行车数量、普通自行车数量以及自行车道宽度。安全性能模型有助于更好地理解街区中间自行车道撞车事故的成因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验