Suppr超能文献

廷伯根的“四个问题”为更全面地理解亲社会的偏向于有吸引力的人的偏见提供了一个正式框架。

Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people.

机构信息

Department of Psychology,Macquarie University,North Ryde,New South Wales 2109,

School of Psychology,University of Newcastle,Ourimbah,New South Wales 2258,

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e44. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000650.

Abstract

We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.

摘要

我们采用 Tinbergen 的(1963)“四个问题”方法来加强 Maestripieri 等人对偏爱有吸引力的个体的非进化解释的批评,通过展示这些解释中缺少哪些层次的解释。我们还使用这种方法来提出如何扩展和加强进化解释的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验