• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浪漫爱情的近因视角与终极视角

Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love.

作者信息

Bode Adam, Kushnick Geoff

机构信息

Human Behavioural Ecology Research Group, School of Archaeology and Anthropology, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:573123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123
PMID:33912094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8074860/
Abstract

Romantic love is a phenomenon of immense interest to the general public as well as to scholars in several disciplines. It is known to be present in almost all human societies and has been studied from a number of perspectives. In this integrative review, we bring together what is known about romantic love using Tinbergen's "four questions" framework originating from evolutionary biology. Under the first question, related to mechanisms, we show that it is caused by social, psychological mate choice, genetic, neural, and endocrine mechanisms. The mechanisms regulating psychopathology, cognitive biases, and animal models provide further insights into the mechanisms that regulate romantic love. Under the second question, related to development, we show that romantic love exists across the human lifespan in both sexes. We summarize what is known about its development and the internal and external factors that influence it. We consider cross-cultural perspectives and raise the issue of evolutionary mismatch. Under the third question, related to function, we discuss the fitness-relevant benefits and costs of romantic love with reference to mate choice, courtship, sex, and pair-bonding. We outline three possible selective pressures and contend that romantic love is a suite of adaptions and by-products. Under the fourth question, related to phylogeny, we summarize theories of romantic love's evolutionary history and show that romantic love probably evolved in concert with pair-bonds in our recent ancestors. We describe the mammalian antecedents to romantic love and the contribution of genes and culture to the expression of modern romantic love. We advance four potential scenarios for the evolution of romantic love. We conclude by summarizing what Tinbergen's four questions tell us, highlighting outstanding questions as avenues of potential future research, and suggesting a novel ethologically informed working definition to accommodate the multi-faceted understanding of romantic love advanced in this review.

摘要

浪漫爱情是一种既让普通大众感兴趣,又引起多个学科领域学者关注的现象。几乎在所有人类社会中都能发现它的存在,并且人们已从多个角度对其展开研究。在这篇综合性综述中,我们运用源自进化生物学的廷贝亨“四个问题”框架,汇总了关于浪漫爱情的已知信息。在与机制相关的第一个问题下,我们表明浪漫爱情是由社会、心理层面的配偶选择、基因、神经及内分泌机制所引发的。调节精神病理学、认知偏差及动物模型的机制,为调控浪漫爱情的机制提供了进一步的见解。在与发展相关的第二个问题下,我们表明浪漫爱情在人类两性的整个生命周期中都存在。我们总结了关于其发展以及影响它的内部和外部因素的已知情况。我们考虑了跨文化视角,并提出了进化不匹配的问题。在与功能相关的第三个问题下,我们参照配偶选择、求爱、性行为及伴侣关系,讨论了浪漫爱情与适应度相关的益处和代价。我们概述了三种可能的选择压力,并认为浪漫爱情是一系列适应和副产品。在与系统发育相关的第四个问题下,我们总结了浪漫爱情进化史的理论,并表明浪漫爱情可能是在我们近代祖先中与伴侣关系一同进化而来的。我们描述了浪漫爱情在哺乳动物中的前身,以及基因和文化对现代浪漫爱情表达的贡献。我们提出了浪漫爱情进化的四种潜在情景。我们通过总结廷贝亨的四个问题告诉我们的内容来得出结论,强调突出问题作为未来潜在研究的途径,并提出一个新颖的、从行为学角度出发的工作定义,以适应本综述中对浪漫爱情的多方面理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa2/8074860/a23f9a12ec59/fpsyg-12-573123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa2/8074860/a23f9a12ec59/fpsyg-12-573123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa2/8074860/a23f9a12ec59/fpsyg-12-573123-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love.浪漫爱情的近因视角与终极视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:573123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123. eCollection 2021.
2
Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: the curious case of Homo sapiens.伴侣关系、浪漫爱情与进化:智人的奇特案例。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):20-36. doi: 10.1177/1745691614561683.
3
Romantic Love and Sleep Variations: Potential Proximate Mechanisms and Evolutionary Functions.浪漫爱情与睡眠变化:潜在的近因机制及进化功能
Biology (Basel). 2021 Sep 16;10(9):923. doi: 10.3390/biology10090923.
4
Romantic love: an fMRI study of a neural mechanism for mate choice.浪漫爱情:一项关于择偶神经机制的功能磁共振成像研究
J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):58-62. doi: 10.1002/cne.20772.
5
Corrigendum: Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love.勘误:浪漫爱情的近因与终极视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:694913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694913. eCollection 2021.
6
Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choice.浪漫爱情:一种用于配偶选择的哺乳动物脑系统。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2173-86. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1938.
7
The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives.从人类和动物视角看爱情与伴侣关系的神经生物学
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;12(6):844. doi: 10.3390/biology12060844.
8
Love songs and serenades: a theoretical review of music and romantic relationships.情歌与小夜曲:音乐与浪漫关系的理论综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1302548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1302548. eCollection 2024.
9
Romantic love evolved by co-opting mother-infant bonding.浪漫爱情是通过利用母婴联结进化而来的。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 17;14:1176067. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176067. eCollection 2023.
10
Embodied self-other overlap in romantic love: a review and integrative perspective.浪漫爱情中的具身自我-他人重叠:综述与综合观点。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):899-914. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01301-8. Epub 2020 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
We know more and less about love: a comment on Babková and Repiská (2025).我们对爱了解得或多或少:关于巴布科娃和雷皮斯卡(2025年)的评论。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jul 31;19:1602582. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1602582. eCollection 2025.
2
How much we express love predicts how much we feel loved in daily life.我们表达爱的程度预示着我们在日常生活中感受到被爱的程度。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0323326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323326. eCollection 2025.
3
Addicted to love? Validity evidence for the Love Addiction Inventory - Brazilian version.

本文引用的文献

1
Oxytocin, Dopamine, and Opioid Interactions Underlying Pair Bonding: Highlighting a Potential Role for Microglia.催产素、多巴胺和阿片类物质相互作用在伴侣关系形成中的作用:突出小胶质细胞的潜在作用。
Endocrinology. 2021 Feb 1;162(2). doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa223.
2
Universality of the Triangular Theory of Love: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Triangular Love Scale in 25 Countries.爱情三角理论的普遍性:25 个国家的三角形爱情量表的适应和心理测量特性。
J Sex Res. 2021 Jan;58(1):106-115. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Did Prosociality Drive the Evolution of Homosexuality?
沉迷于爱?《爱情成瘾量表》巴西版的效度证据。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 Apr 30;38(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00345-2.
4
Sex differences in romantic love: an evolutionary perspective.浪漫爱情中的性别差异:进化视角
Biol Sex Differ. 2025 Feb 24;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13293-025-00698-4.
5
Love actually: Is relationship status associated with dark triad personality traits and attitudes towards love?真爱至上:恋爱状况与黑暗三性格特质及爱情态度有关联吗?
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 8;10(22):e40215. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40215. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
6
Love as a Commitment Device  : Evidence from a Cross-Cultural Study across 90 Countries.作为一种承诺机制的爱情:来自一项涵盖90个国家的跨文化研究的证据。
Hum Nat. 2024 Dec;35(4):430-450. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09482-6. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
7
Young adults' desired life tradeoffs: love first, sex last.年轻人渴望的生活权衡:先爱后性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 24;14(1):19680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70742-7.
8
Development and psychometric evaluation of a new domain-specific coparenting measure: Coparenting Children's Emotion Scale.一种新的特定领域共同养育测量工具——共同养育儿童情绪量表的开发与心理测量学评估。
Fam Process. 2024 Dec;63(4):2581-2602. doi: 10.1111/famp.13031. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
9
Exploring Aromanticism Through an Online Qualitative Investigation With the Aromantic Community: "Freeing, Alienating, and Utterly Fantastic".通过对无浪漫情感者群体进行在线定性调查探索无浪漫情感主义:“解放、疏离与无比奇妙”
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Feb 14;36(1):126-143. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2311158. eCollection 2024.
10
Love songs and serenades: a theoretical review of music and romantic relationships.情歌与小夜曲:音乐与浪漫关系的理论综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1302548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1302548. eCollection 2024.
亲社会行为推动了同性恋的进化吗?
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Oct;49(7):2239-2244. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01749-0. Epub 2020 May 31.
4
Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations.人类地位标准:14 个国家的性别差异和相似性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;119(5):979-998. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000206. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
After the Honeymoon: Neural and Genetic Correlates of Romantic Love in Newlywed Marriages.蜜月之后:新婚夫妻浪漫爱情的神经与遗传关联
Front Psychol. 2020 May 7;11:634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00634. eCollection 2020.
6
To accept or reject heterospecific mates: behavioural decisions underlying premating isolation.接受或拒绝异源配偶:交配前隔离的行为决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 6;375(1802):20190484. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0484. Epub 2020 May 18.
7
Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.45 个国家的配偶偏好的性别差异:大规模复制。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):408-423. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904154. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
8
Emotions relating to romantic love-further disruptors of adolescent sleep.与浪漫爱情相关的情绪——进一步扰乱青少年睡眠的因素。
Sleep Health. 2020 Apr;6(2):159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Prosociality and a Sociosexual Hypothesis for the Evolution of Same-Sex Attraction in Humans.亲社会行为与人类同性吸引进化的社会性行为假说
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 16;10:2955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02955. eCollection 2019.
10
Sexual differentiation of brain and other tissues: Five questions for the next 50 years.脑和其他组织的性别分化:未来 50 年的 5 个问题。
Horm Behav. 2020 Apr;120:104691. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104691. Epub 2020 Jan 31.