Cepeda Javier A, Solomon Sunil S, Srikrishnan Aylur K, McFall Allison M, Kumar Muniratnam Suresh, Vasudevan Canjeevaram K, Anand Santhanam, Celentano David D, Lucas Gregory M, Mehta Shruti H
*Division of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; †Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; ‡Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and §YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Chennai, India.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Jul 1;75(3):257-264. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001372.
People who inject drugs (PWID) who are highly connected within their injection drug networks may be important HIV transmission nodes if they frequently share syringes with other PWID and are not engaged in HIV care. In India, HIV transmission fueled by injection drug use is increasing; however, little is known about the associations between injection network size and syringe sharing and viral suppression.
We recruited 14,481 PWID between October 2012 and December 2013 by respondent-driven sampling across 15 sites in India. Interviewer-administered questionnaires assessed network characteristics, substance use, HIV testing experience, and access to health services. We used multilevel logistic regression modeling to evaluate the relationship between injection drug network size and (1) syringe sharing at last injection and (2) viral suppression among HIV-positive participants (<150 copies/mL).
The median injection network size was 3 (interquartile range: 1-5), and 7% of participants injected with >10 members in the past 30 days. PWID who had >10 members in their network were 1.65 times (95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 2.42, P = 0.0111) more likely to have shared a syringe at last injection compared with those in the 0-1 members in their drug networks. In addition, individuals with the largest injection drug networks were 31% (95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 0.90, P = 0.006) less likely to be virally suppressed compared with those in the smallest injection drug networks.
Individuals with larger networks may be important in HIV transmission within injection drug networks because they were the most likely to engage in recent syringe sharing and least likely to be virally suppressed.
在注射毒品网络中联系紧密的注射吸毒者(PWID)如果经常与其他注射吸毒者共用注射器且未接受艾滋病病毒治疗,可能会成为重要的艾滋病病毒传播节点。在印度,由注射吸毒引发的艾滋病病毒传播正在增加;然而,关于注射网络规模与注射器共享以及病毒抑制之间的关联,人们了解甚少。
2012年10月至2013年12月期间,我们通过应答驱动抽样在印度的15个地点招募了14481名注射吸毒者。由访谈员管理的问卷评估了网络特征、物质使用情况、艾滋病病毒检测经历以及获得医疗服务的情况。我们使用多水平逻辑回归模型来评估注射毒品网络规模与(1)上次注射时的注射器共享情况以及(2)艾滋病病毒呈阳性参与者(<150拷贝/毫升)中的病毒抑制情况之间的关系。
注射网络规模的中位数为3(四分位间距:1 - 5),7%的参与者在过去30天内与10名以上成员一起注射。与毒品网络中成员数为0 - 1名的注射吸毒者相比,网络中有10名以上成员的注射吸毒者上次注射时共用注射器的可能性高1.65倍(95%置信区间:1.12至2.42,P = 0.0111)。此外,与注射毒品网络规模最小的人相比,注射毒品网络规模最大的人病毒得到抑制的可能性低31%(95%置信区间:0.53至0.90,P = 0.006)。
网络规模较大的个体在注射毒品网络中的艾滋病病毒传播中可能很重要,因为他们最有可能近期共用注射器,且病毒得到抑制的可能性最小。