• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两拇指优于两手指技术在单人施救婴儿心肺复苏中的应用。

The superiority of the two-thumb over the two-finger technique for single-rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center.

Department of Emergency Medicine.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):372-376. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000461.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000461
PMID:28328729
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The two-finger technique (TFT) using the index-middle fingers of the right hand (TFT-R23) was recently confirmed to produce deeper chest compression depth (CCD) compared with the TFT using any other fingers. This study was carried out to confirm whether the TFT-R23 would be as effective as the two-thumb technique (TTT). In addition, individual finger strengths were measured to identify the reasons why the TTT and TFT-R23 produced deeper CCD than any other methods.

METHODS

This prospective randomized cross-over trial compared TTT with TFT-R23. A total of 37 doctors conducted 2 min single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation using TTT and TFT-R23 in a random order using a 3-month-old sized infant manikin laid on the floor. The chest compression to ventilation ratio was set to 15 : 2. In addition, finger strengths were measured using a pinch meter.

RESULTS

The actual CCD of the TTT was significantly deeper than that of the TFT-R23 (41.3±1.3 vs. 39.8±1.5 mm, P<0.001). Although the hands-off time of the TTT was significantly longer than that of the TFT-R23 (55.6±5.7 vs. 53.6±5.8 s, P=0.002), the mean difference was only 2.0±3.7 s (95% confidence interval: 0.755-3.245). The finger strength of the TTT was significantly higher than that of TFT-R23 (23.8±10.1 vs. 13.7±5.1 kg, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TTT produced deeper CCD compared with that of the TFT-R23 because the finger strength of the TTT was significantly higher than that of the TFT-R23.

摘要

目的

使用右手食指-中指(TFT-R2)的两指技术(TFT)最近被证实比使用任何其他手指的 TFT 产生更深的胸部按压深度(CCD)。本研究旨在确认 TFT-R2 是否与两拇指技术(TTT)一样有效。此外,还测量了单个手指的力量,以确定 TTT 和 TFT-R2 为何比任何其他方法产生更深的 CCD 的原因。

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机交叉试验,比较了 TTT 和 TFT-R23。总共 37 名医生使用一个 3 个月大的婴儿人体模型,在地板上以随机顺序使用 TTT 和 TFT-R23 进行了 2 分钟单人复苏心肺复苏。胸部按压与通气的比例设定为 15:2。此外,使用捏合计测量手指力量。

结果

TTT 的实际 CCD 明显比 TFT-R23 深(41.3±1.3 vs. 39.8±1.5 mm,P<0.001)。尽管 TTT 的手离时间明显长于 TFT-R23(55.6±5.7 vs. 53.6±5.8 s,P=0.002),但平均差异仅为 2.0±3.7 s(95%置信区间:0.755-3.245)。TTT 的手指力量明显高于 TFT-R23(23.8±10.1 vs. 13.7±5.1 kg,P<0.001)。

结论

TTT 产生的 CCD 比 TFT-R23 更深,因为 TTT 的手指力量明显高于 TFT-R23。

相似文献

1
The superiority of the two-thumb over the two-finger technique for single-rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.两拇指优于两手指技术在单人施救婴儿心肺复苏中的应用。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):372-376. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000461.
2
Two-Thumb Encircling Technique Over the Head of Patients in the Setting of Lone Rescuer Infant CPR Occurred During Ambulance Transfer: A Crossover Simulation Study.在救护车转运过程中,单人救援者对婴儿进行心肺复苏时采用的头顶双拇指环抱技术:一项交叉模拟研究。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Jul;33(7):462-466. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000833.
3
A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study.婴儿心肺复苏期间三种胸外按压技术及其相关血流动力学效应的随机比较:一项随机人体模型研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;35(10):1420-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Over-the-head two-thumb encircling technique as an alternative to the two-finger technique in the in-hospital infant cardiac arrest setting: a randomised crossover simulation study.在院内婴儿心脏骤停情况下,使用过头双拇指环抱技术替代双指技术:一项随机交叉模拟研究。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Sep;32(9):703-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203873. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
5
Which Fingers Should We Perform Two-Finger Chest Compression Technique with When Performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on an Infant in Cardiac Arrest?对心脏骤停的婴儿进行心肺复苏时,应用两指胸部按压技术时我们应该用哪几根手指?
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jun;31(6):997-1002. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.997. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.模拟研究中单人对婴儿进行心肺复苏时双拇指环抱法与双指法的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(45):e17853. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017853.
7
Effect of metronome guidance on infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.节拍器指导对婴儿心肺复苏的影响。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;178(6):795-801. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03357-0. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
8
The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial.护理人员应用的一种新开发的婴儿胸外按压方法的质量:一项随机交叉模拟人试验。
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(6):589-595. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0015. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial.新手医生实施的婴儿心肺复苏新双拇指胸外按压技术评估:一项随机、交叉、模拟人试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):604-609. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.045. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
Development and Evaluation of a New Chest Compression Technique for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Infants.一种用于婴儿心肺复苏的新胸外按压技术的开发与评估
Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Aug;40(6):1217-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00246-019-02135-x. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Hand position during chest compression in infantile piglets - Do you need to encircle the chest with the 2-thumb-technique?仔猪胸部按压时的手部位置——你需要用双拇指技术环绕胸部吗?
Resusc Plus. 2024 Dec 30;21:100857. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100857. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.2023 年国际心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理科学共识及治疗推荐:基础生命支持、高级生命支持、儿科生命支持、新生儿生命支持、教育、实施和团队以及急救任务组的总结。
Circulation. 2023 Dec 12;148(24):e187-e280. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3
New chest compression method in infant resuscitation: Cross thumb technique.婴儿复苏中的新胸外按压方法:交叉拇指技术。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0271636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271636. eCollection 2022.
4
Two-Thumb Technique Is Superior to Two-Finger Technique in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Infants.双手环抱推举法在婴儿模拟院外心脏骤停心肺复苏中的效果优于双指推举法。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e018050. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018050. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Dominant versus non-dominant hand during simulated infant CPR using the two-finger technique: a randomised study.使用两指技术进行模拟婴儿心肺复苏时优势手与非优势手的比较:一项随机研究
Resusc Plus. 2021 May 27;7:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100141. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
[Paediatric Life Support].[儿科生命支持]
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):650-719. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00887-9. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Two-Thumb or Two-Finger Technique in Infant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by a Single Rescuer? A Meta-Analysis with GOSH Analysis.单人施救者行婴儿心肺复苏的双指或双拇指技术?GOSH 分析的荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 19;17(14):5214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145214.
8
Analysis of Chest-Compression Depth and Full Recoil in Two Infant Chest-Compression Techniques Performed by a Single Rescuer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单人施救者实施的两种婴儿胸外按压技术的按压深度和完全回弹的分析:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;17(11):4018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114018.
9
Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: "Approximately 4 cm" versus "at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest".根据婴儿心肺复苏复苏指南术语的不同,复苏表现存在差异:“大约 4 厘米”与“至少为前胸后径的三分之一”。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 24;15(3):e0230687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230687. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.模拟研究中单人对婴儿进行心肺复苏时双拇指环抱法与双指法的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(45):e17853. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017853.