Suppr超能文献

两拇指优于两手指技术在单人施救婴儿心肺复苏中的应用。

The superiority of the two-thumb over the two-finger technique for single-rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center.

Department of Emergency Medicine.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):372-376. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000461.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The two-finger technique (TFT) using the index-middle fingers of the right hand (TFT-R23) was recently confirmed to produce deeper chest compression depth (CCD) compared with the TFT using any other fingers. This study was carried out to confirm whether the TFT-R23 would be as effective as the two-thumb technique (TTT). In addition, individual finger strengths were measured to identify the reasons why the TTT and TFT-R23 produced deeper CCD than any other methods.

METHODS

This prospective randomized cross-over trial compared TTT with TFT-R23. A total of 37 doctors conducted 2 min single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation using TTT and TFT-R23 in a random order using a 3-month-old sized infant manikin laid on the floor. The chest compression to ventilation ratio was set to 15 : 2. In addition, finger strengths were measured using a pinch meter.

RESULTS

The actual CCD of the TTT was significantly deeper than that of the TFT-R23 (41.3±1.3 vs. 39.8±1.5 mm, P<0.001). Although the hands-off time of the TTT was significantly longer than that of the TFT-R23 (55.6±5.7 vs. 53.6±5.8 s, P=0.002), the mean difference was only 2.0±3.7 s (95% confidence interval: 0.755-3.245). The finger strength of the TTT was significantly higher than that of TFT-R23 (23.8±10.1 vs. 13.7±5.1 kg, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TTT produced deeper CCD compared with that of the TFT-R23 because the finger strength of the TTT was significantly higher than that of the TFT-R23.

摘要

目的

使用右手食指-中指(TFT-R2)的两指技术(TFT)最近被证实比使用任何其他手指的 TFT 产生更深的胸部按压深度(CCD)。本研究旨在确认 TFT-R2 是否与两拇指技术(TTT)一样有效。此外,还测量了单个手指的力量,以确定 TTT 和 TFT-R2 为何比任何其他方法产生更深的 CCD 的原因。

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机交叉试验,比较了 TTT 和 TFT-R23。总共 37 名医生使用一个 3 个月大的婴儿人体模型,在地板上以随机顺序使用 TTT 和 TFT-R23 进行了 2 分钟单人复苏心肺复苏。胸部按压与通气的比例设定为 15:2。此外,使用捏合计测量手指力量。

结果

TTT 的实际 CCD 明显比 TFT-R23 深(41.3±1.3 vs. 39.8±1.5 mm,P<0.001)。尽管 TTT 的手离时间明显长于 TFT-R23(55.6±5.7 vs. 53.6±5.8 s,P=0.002),但平均差异仅为 2.0±3.7 s(95%置信区间:0.755-3.245)。TTT 的手指力量明显高于 TFT-R23(23.8±10.1 vs. 13.7±5.1 kg,P<0.001)。

结论

TTT 产生的 CCD 比 TFT-R23 更深,因为 TTT 的手指力量明显高于 TFT-R23。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验