Kashiwagi Kazuhiro, Inoue Nagamu, Yoshida Toshifumi, Bessyo Rieko, Yoneno Kazuaki, Imaeda Hiroyuki, Ogata Haruhiko, Kanai Takanori, Sugino Yoshinori, Iwao Yasushi
Center for Preventive Medicine, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 22;12(3):e0174155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174155. eCollection 2017.
The guidelines for colonoscopy present withdrawal time (WT) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) as the quality indicator. The purpose of this retrospective study is to analyze the predicting factors with polyp detection rate (PDR) as a surrogate for ADR by using comprehensive health checkup data, and assess the correlation between PDR per each colonic segment and WT, and factors influencing WT.
One thousand and thirty six consecutive health checkup cases from April 2015 to March 2016 were enrolled in this study, and 880 subjects who undertook colonoscopy without polyp removal or biopsy were divided into the two groups (polyp not detected group vs polyp detected group). The two groups were compared by subjects and clinical characteristics with univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis. Colonoscopies with longer WT (≥ 6 min) and those with shorter WT (< 6 min) were compared by PDR per each colonic segment, and also by subjects and clinical characteristics.
A total of 1009 subjects included two incomplete colonoscopies (CIR, 99.9%) and overall PDR was 35.8%. A multiple logistic regression model demonstrated that age, gender, and WT were significantly related factors for polyp detection (odds ratio, 1.036; 1.771; 1.217). PDR showed a linear increase as WT increased from 3 min to 9 min (r = 0.989, p = 0.000) and PDR with long WT group was higher than that with short WT group per each colonic segment, significantly in transverse (2.3 times, p = 0.004) and sigmoid colon (2.1 times, p = 0.001). Not only bowel preparation quality but also insertion difficulty evaluated by endoscopist were significant factors relating with WT (odds ratio, 3.811; 1.679).
This study suggests that endoscopists should be recommended to take more time up to 9 min of WT to observe transverse and sigmoid colon, especially when they feel no difficulty during scope insertion.
结肠镜检查指南将退镜时间(WT)和腺瘤检出率(ADR)作为质量指标。这项回顾性研究的目的是通过综合健康体检数据,分析以息肉检出率(PDR)作为ADR替代指标的预测因素,并评估各结肠段的PDR与WT之间的相关性以及影响WT的因素。
本研究纳入了2015年4月至2016年3月期间连续的1036例健康体检病例,其中880例未进行息肉切除或活检的结肠镜检查受试者被分为两组(未检测到息肉组与检测到息肉组)。通过单因素分析和多因素分析对两组受试者和临床特征进行比较。对WT较长(≥6分钟)和WT较短(<6分钟)的结肠镜检查,按各结肠段的PDR进行比较,同时也按受试者和临床特征进行比较。
总共1009名受试者中有2例结肠镜检查不完整(CIR,99.9%),总体PDR为35.8%。多元逻辑回归模型显示,年龄、性别和WT是息肉检测的显著相关因素(比值比分别为1.036、1.771、1.217)。随着WT从3分钟增加到9分钟,PDR呈线性增加(r = 0.989,p = 0.000),各结肠段长WT组的PDR高于短WT组,横结肠(2.3倍,p = 0.004)和乙状结肠(2.1倍,p = 0.001)差异显著。不仅肠道准备质量,而且内镜医师评估的插入难度都是与WT相关的显著因素(比值比分别为3.811、1.679)。
本研究表明,建议内镜医师在WT达9分钟的时间内花更多时间观察横结肠和乙状结肠,尤其是当他们在插入内镜时感觉没有困难时。