• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续血流左心室辅助装置植入后严重右心衰竭的非计划性右心室辅助装置的当代治疗结果

Contemporary outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device for severe right heart failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device insertion.

作者信息

Yoshioka Daisuke, Takayama Hiroo, Garan Reshad A, Topkara Veli K, Han Jiho, Kurlansky Paul, Yuzefpolskaya Melana, Colombo Paolo C, Naka Yoshifumi, Takeda Koji

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;24(6):828-834. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw409.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivw409
PMID:28329284
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The timely use of a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) becomes necessary for severe right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) insertion. This study evaluates outcomes in patients who required unplanned RVAD support early after continuous-flow (CF) LVAD insertion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 305 patients who underwent HeartMate II/HeartWare CF-LVAD insertion between 2009 and 2014. Twenty-seven (9%) patients required unplanned RVAD for severe RHF early after LVAD insertion. We compared early and late outcomes in patients with and without RVAD.

RESULTS

The median time to RVAD implantation after primary CF-LVAD implantation was 1.0 (0-3) day. Seventeen (63%) patients could be weaned from RVAD after median of 14 (10-18) days. In 278 patients in the isolated LVAD group, overall survival at 3 and 12 months was 95% and 86%, whereas 59% and 54% in the unplanned RVAD group, respectively ( P  < 0.001). The 12-month overall survival rate in patients who were weaned from RVAD was 75% ( P  = 0.189 vs isolated LVAD group), whereas in patients who could not be weaned from RVAD, the overall survival was 20% ( P  < 0.001 vs RVAD weaning group and isolated LVAD group). Readmission free rate for RHF at 1 year was 53% in the unplanned RVAD group and 90% in the isolated LVAD group ( P  = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who required unplanned RVAD after CF-LVAD implantation, above 60% of the patients could be weaned from RVAD. However, careful attention should be paid to the recurrent or sustained RHF.

摘要

目的

对于左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后发生的严重右心衰竭(RHF),及时使用右心室辅助装置(RVAD)变得必要。本研究评估了连续血流(CF)LVAD植入后早期需要非计划性RVAD支持的患者的结局。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年至2014年间接受HeartMate II/HeartWare CF-LVAD植入的305例患者。27例(9%)患者在LVAD植入后早期因严重RHF需要非计划性RVAD。我们比较了有和没有RVAD患者的早期和晚期结局。

结果

初次CF-LVAD植入后至RVAD植入的中位时间为1.0(0-3)天。17例(63%)患者在中位14(10-18)天后可脱离RVAD。在单纯LVAD组的278例患者中,3个月和12个月的总生存率分别为95%和86%,而在非计划性RVAD组中分别为59%和54%(P<0.001)。脱离RVAD的患者12个月总生存率为75%(与单纯LVAD组相比,P=0.189),而不能脱离RVAD的患者总生存率为20%(与RVAD脱离组和单纯LVAD组相比,P<0.001)。非计划性RVAD组1年时RHF再入院率为53%,单纯LVAD组为90%(P=0.002)。

结论

在CF-LVAD植入后需要非计划性RVAD的患者中,超过60%的患者可脱离RVAD。然而,应密切关注复发性或持续性RHF。

相似文献

1
Contemporary outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device for severe right heart failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device insertion.持续血流左心室辅助装置植入后严重右心衰竭的非计划性右心室辅助装置的当代治疗结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;24(6):828-834. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw409.
2
Outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device support for severe right heart failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion.植入左心室辅助装置后因严重右心衰竭接受非计划性右心室辅助装置支持的结果
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Feb;33(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
3
Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.慢性充血性心力衰竭患者植入左心室辅助装置后发生的右心衰竭。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Jan;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
4
Right ventricular response to pulsatile load is associated with early right heart failure and mortality after left ventricular assist device.右心室对脉动负荷的反应与左心室辅助装置后早期右心衰竭和死亡率有关。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jan;36(1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Late right heart failure during support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices adversely affects post-transplant outcome.在使用连续流左心室辅助装置支持期间发生的晚期右心衰竭会对移植后结局产生不利影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 May;34(5):667-74. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.接受连续血流左心室辅助装置植入患者早期使用右心室辅助装置:来自机构间机械辅助循环支持注册中心的发生率及危险因素
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003863.
7
Can Perioperative Right Ventricular Support Prevent Postoperative Right Heart Failure in Patients With Biventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?围手术期右心室支持能否预防接受左心室辅助装置植入的双心室功能障碍患者术后右心衰竭?
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):619-26. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Survival after left ventricular assist device with and without temporary right ventricular support.左心室辅助装置辅助治疗伴或不伴临时右心室支持的生存情况。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
9
Alternative right ventricular assist device implantation technique for patients with perioperative right ventricular failure.围手术期右心室衰竭患者的替代性右心室辅助装置植入技术
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):927-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.104. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
10
Temporary right ventricular support following left ventricle assist device implantation: a comparison of two techniques.左心室辅助装置植入术后的临时右心室支持:两种技术的比较
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):49-55. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu072. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Test Bench for Right Ventricular Failure Reversibility: The Hybrid BiVAD Concept.右心室衰竭可逆性测试平台:混合双心室辅助装置概念
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 10;12(24):7604. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247604.
2
A primer for students regarding advanced topics in cardiothoracic surgery, part 2: Primer 7 of 7.面向学生的心胸外科高级主题入门,第2部分:7篇入门文章中的第7篇。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Apr 13;14:362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.04.002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Biventricular assist devices and total artificial heart: Strategies and outcomes.双心室辅助装置和全人工心脏:策略与结果。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 6;9:972132. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.972132. eCollection 2022.
4
Planned Combo Strategy for LVAD Implantation in ECMO Patients: A Proof of Concept to Face Right Ventricular Failure.体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)患者左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入的计划组合策略:应对右心室衰竭的概念验证
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 29;11(23):7062. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237062.
5
Role of the mitral valve in left ventricular assist device pathophysiology.二尖瓣在左心室辅助装置病理生理学中的作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 28;9:1018295. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1018295. eCollection 2022.
6
Mechanical circulatory support devices and treatment strategies for right heart failure.右心衰竭的机械循环支持装置及治疗策略
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 23;9:951234. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.951234. eCollection 2022.
7
Mechanical Circulatory Support for Right Ventricular Failure.右心室衰竭的机械循环支持
Card Fail Rev. 2022 Apr 21;8:e14. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.11. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Temporary Right-Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review.临时右心室辅助装置:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 26;11(3):613. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030613.
9
Outcome of right ventricular assist device implantation following left ventricular assist device implantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.左心室辅助装置植入术后右心室辅助装置植入的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Perfusion. 2022 Nov;37(8):773-784. doi: 10.1177/02676591211024817. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
10
A right ventricular state of mind in the progression of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: implications for left ventricular assist device therapy.射血分数降低的心力衰竭进展过程中的右心室状态:对左心室辅助装置治疗的意义。
Heart Fail Rev. 2021 Nov;26(6):1467-1475. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-09935-x.