Delpeut Sébastien, Sawatsky Bevan, Wong Xiao-Xiang, Frenzke Marie, Cattaneo Roberto, von Messling Veronika
INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, University of Quebec, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Veterinary Medicine Division, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany.
J Virol. 2017 May 12;91(11). doi: 10.1128/JVI.02490-16. Print 2017 Jun 1.
In addition to humans, only certain nonhuman primates are naturally susceptible to measles virus (MeV) infection. Disease severity is species dependent, ranging from mild to moderate for macaques to severe and even lethal for certain New World monkey species. To investigate if squirrel monkeys (), which are reported to develop a course of disease similar to humans, may be better suited than macaques for the identification of virulence determinants or the evaluation of therapeutics, we infected them with a green fluorescent protein-expressing MeV. Compared to cynomolgus macaques () infected with the same virus, the squirrel monkeys developed more-severe immunosuppression, higher viral load, and a broader range of clinical signs typical for measles. In contrast, infection with an MeV unable to interact with the epithelial receptor nectin-4, while causing immunosuppression, resulted in only a mild and transient rash and a short-lived elevation of the body temperature. Similar titers of the wild-type and nectin-4-blind MeV were detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and lymph node homogenates, but only the wild-type virus was found in tracheal lavage fluids and urine. Thus, our study demonstrates the importance of MeV interactions with nectin-4 for clinical disease in the new and better-performing model of measles pathogenesis. The characterization of mechanisms underlying measles virus clinical disease has been hampered by the lack of an animal model that reproduces the course of disease seen in human patients. Here, we report that infection of squirrel monkeys () fulfills these requirements. Comparative infection with wild-type and epithelial cell receptor-blind viruses demonstrated the importance of epithelial cell infection for clinical disease, highlighting the spread to epithelia as an attractive target for therapeutic strategies.
除人类外,只有某些非人类灵长类动物对麻疹病毒(MeV)感染具有天然易感性。疾病严重程度因物种而异,猕猴的症状从轻度到中度不等,而某些新大陆猴物种则会出现严重甚至致命的症状。为了研究据报道会出现与人类相似病程的松鼠猴是否比猕猴更适合用于鉴定毒力决定因素或评估治疗方法,我们用表达绿色荧光蛋白的MeV感染了它们。与感染相同病毒的食蟹猕猴相比,松鼠猴出现了更严重的免疫抑制、更高的病毒载量以及更广泛的典型麻疹临床症状。相比之下,感染一种无法与上皮受体nectin-4相互作用的MeV,虽然会导致免疫抑制,但只会引起轻微且短暂的皮疹以及体温短暂升高。在外周血单核细胞和淋巴结匀浆中检测到野生型和nectin-4缺陷型MeV的滴度相似,但在气管灌洗液和尿液中仅发现了野生型病毒。因此,我们的研究证明了MeV与nectin-4相互作用在新的、性能更好的麻疹发病机制模型中对临床疾病的重要性。麻疹病毒临床疾病潜在机制的表征一直受到缺乏能够重现人类患者病程的动物模型的阻碍。在此,我们报告松鼠猴的感染满足了这些要求。野生型病毒与上皮细胞受体缺陷型病毒的对比感染证明了上皮细胞感染对临床疾病的重要性,突出了上皮细胞传播作为治疗策略的一个有吸引力的靶点。