Suppr超能文献

对一系列连续性复杂性失眠症患者进行自动调节双水平气道正压通气治疗的回顾性非随机对照研究。

Retrospective, nonrandomized controlled study on autoadjusting, dual-pressure positive airway pressure therapy for a consecutive series of complex insomnia disorder patients.

作者信息

Krakow Barry, McIver Natalia D, Ulibarri Victor A, Nadorff Michael R

机构信息

Sleep & Human Health Institute; Maimonides Sleep Arts & Sciences, Ltd, Albuquerque; Los Alamos Medical Center, Los Alamos, NM.

Sleep & Human Health Institute; Maimonides Sleep Arts & Sciences, Ltd, Albuquerque.

出版信息

Nat Sci Sleep. 2017 Mar 10;9:81-95. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S120048. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Emerging evidence shows that positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS) in chronic insomnia patients (proposed "complex insomnia" disorder) leads to substantial decreases in insomnia severity. Although continuous PAP (CPAP) is the pressure mode most widely researched, intolerance to fixed pressurized air is rarely investigated or described in comorbidity patients. This retrospective study examined dual pressure, autoadjusting PAP modes in chronic, complex insomnia disorder patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chronic insomnia disorder patients (mean [SD] insomnia severity index [ISI] =19.11 [3.34]) objectively diagnosed with OSA or UARS and using either autobilevel PAP device or adaptive servoventilation (ASV) device after failing CPAP therapy (frequently due to intolerance to pressurized air, poor outcomes, or emergence of CSA) were divided into PAP users (≥20 h/wk) and partial users (<20 h/wk) for comparison. Subjective and objective baseline and follow-up measures were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 302 complex insomnia patients, PAP users (n=246) averaged 6.10 (1.78) nightly hours and 42.71 (12.48) weekly hours and partial users (n=56) averaged 1.67 (0.76) nightly hours and 11.70 (5.31) weekly hours. For mean (SD) decreases in total ISI scores, a significant (group × time) interaction was observed ([1,300]=13.566; <0.0001) with PAP users (-7.59 [5.92]; =1.63) showing superior results to partial users (-4.34 [6.13]; =0.81). Anecdotally, patients reported better tolerability with advanced PAP compared to previous experience with CPAP. Both adaptive servoventilation and autobilevel PAP showed similar ISI score improvement without statistical differences between devices. Total weekly hours of PAP use correlated inversely with change in insomnia symptoms (=-0.256, <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Insomnia severity significantly decreased in patients using autoadjusting PAP devices, but the study design restricts interpretation to an association. Future research must elucidate the interaction between insomnia and OSA/UARS as well as the adverse influence of pressure intolerance on PAP adaptation in complex insomnia patients. Randomized controlled studies must determine whether advanced PAP modes provide benefits over standard CPAP modes in these comorbidity patients.

摘要

目的

新出现的证据表明,对慢性失眠患者(拟诊为“复杂失眠”障碍)的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)和上气道阻力综合征(UARS)进行气道正压(PAP)治疗可显著降低失眠严重程度。尽管持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是研究最广泛的压力模式,但在合并症患者中,对固定加压空气的不耐受情况很少被研究或描述。这项回顾性研究调查了慢性复杂失眠障碍患者使用双水平自动调压PAP模式的情况。

患者与方法

慢性失眠障碍患者(平均[标准差]失眠严重程度指数[ISI]=19.11[3.34])经客观诊断患有OSA或UARS,在CPAP治疗失败后(通常由于对加压空气不耐受、效果不佳或出现中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停[CSA])使用自动调压PAP设备或适应性伺服通气(ASV)设备,分为PAP使用者(≥20小时/周)和部分使用者(<20小时/周)进行比较。分析主观和客观的基线及随访指标。

结果

在302例复杂失眠患者中,PAP使用者(n=246)平均每晚使用6.10(1.78)小时,每周使用42.71(12.48)小时;部分使用者(n=56)平均每晚使用1.67(0.76)小时,每周使用11.70(5.31)小时。对于ISI总分的平均(标准差)下降情况,观察到显著的(组×时间)交互作用([1,300]=13.566;P<0.0001),PAP使用者(-7.59[5.92];P=1.63)的结果优于部分使用者(-4.34[6.13];P=0.81)。据患者反映,与之前使用CPAP的经历相比,他们对先进的PAP耐受性更好。适应性伺服通气和自动调压PAP均显示ISI评分有相似改善,不同设备之间无统计学差异。每周PAP使用总时长与失眠症状变化呈负相关(r=-0.256,P<0.01)。

结论

使用自动调压PAP设备的患者失眠严重程度显著降低,但该研究设计限制了将结果解释为因果关系。未来的研究必须阐明失眠与OSA/UARS之间的相互作用,以及压力不耐受对复杂失眠患者PAP适应的不利影响。随机对照研究必须确定在这些合并症患者中,先进的PAP模式是否比标准的CPAP模式更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验