• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦敦中学生的哮喘控制情况

Asthma control in London secondary school children.

作者信息

Harris Katherine, Mosler Gioia, Williams Samson A, Whitehouse Abigail, Raine Rosalind, Grigg Jonathan

机构信息

a Centre for Genomics and Child Health , Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry , London , UK.

b Department of Applied Health Research , University College London , London , UK.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2017 Dec;54(10):1033-1040. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1299757. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2017.1299757
PMID:28332884
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The asthma control test (ACT) is a validated tool for assessing control in asthmatic children aged 12 years and older. Using the ACT, we sought to assess asthma control and knowledge in London secondary school children.

METHODS

Secondary schools in London, UK, participated in this study. Children with doctor-diagnosed asthma were invited to complete an online questionnaire that included the ACT and questions about asthma. Suboptimal asthma control was defined as an ACT score of ≤ 19 out of a maximum score of 25. Data are summarised as median and interquartile range (IQR), and were analysed by either Mann-Whitney test, or chi-square test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 799 children completed the questionnaire; 689 (86.2%) were included for analysis. Suboptimal asthma control was reported by 49.6% of students. Over a third (42.4%) of students prescribed a short-acting β2-agonist inhaler felt uncomfortable using it at school, and 29.2% (n = 173) reported not using this inhaler when wheezy. 56.4% (n = 220) of those with regular inhaled corticosteroids did not take them as prescribed, and 41.7% did not know what this inhaler was for. Suboptimal control was associated with a greater proportion of students reporting that they were 'somewhat', 'hardly' or 'not at all' comfortable using inhalers at school (52.7% vs 29.1%, p < 0.01) and outside school (22.8% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal asthma control and poor asthma knowledge are common in London schoolchildren.

摘要

目的

哮喘控制测试(ACT)是一种经过验证的工具,用于评估12岁及以上哮喘儿童的病情控制情况。我们使用ACT来评估伦敦中学生的哮喘控制情况和相关知识。

方法

英国伦敦的中学参与了本研究。邀请医生诊断为哮喘的儿童完成一份在线问卷,其中包括ACT以及有关哮喘的问题。哮喘控制不佳定义为ACT得分在满分25分中≤19分。数据以中位数和四分位间距(IQR)进行汇总,并通过曼-惠特尼检验或卡方检验进行分析。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共有799名儿童完成了问卷;689名(86.2%)纳入分析。49.6%的学生报告哮喘控制不佳。超过三分之一(42.4%)使用短效β2受体激动剂吸入器的学生在学校使用时感到不适,29.2%(n = 173)报告喘息时未使用该吸入器。56.4%(n = 220)规律使用吸入性糖皮质激素的学生未按医嘱用药,41.7%不知道该吸入器的用途。哮喘控制不佳与更大比例的学生报告在学校(52.7%对29.1%,p < 0.01)和校外(22.8%对14.8%,p < 0.01)使用吸入器时“有些”“几乎不”或“根本不”舒适有关。

结论

哮喘控制不佳和哮喘知识匮乏在伦敦学童中很常见。

相似文献

1
Asthma control in London secondary school children.伦敦中学生的哮喘控制情况
J Asthma. 2017 Dec;54(10):1033-1040. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1299757. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
2
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children aged 12 years and over.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁及以上成人和儿童慢性哮喘比较效果的系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(19):iii-iv, 1-360. doi: 10.3310/hta12190.
3
Combination of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled steroids versus higher dose of inhaled steroids in children and adults with persistent asthma.吸入长效β2受体激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用与高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.
4
Long-Acting β-Agonist in Combination or Separate Inhaler as Step-Up Therapy for Children with Uncontrolled Asthma Receiving Inhaled Corticosteroids.长效β受体激动剂联合或单独使用吸入器作为接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗但哮喘控制不佳儿童的升级治疗方案
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jan-Feb;5(1):99-106.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
5
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in children under the age of 12 years.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁以下儿童慢性哮喘的比较效果的系统评价和经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(20):1-174, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta12200.
6
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus placebo in addition to inhaled corticosteroids in children and adults with chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与安慰剂用于慢性哮喘儿童和成人并联合吸入性糖皮质激素的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005535.
7
Establishing the best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids: the EINSTEIN systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis using individual participant data.确定对于尽管使用吸入性糖皮质激素但哮喘仍未得到控制的儿童的最佳升级治疗方案:爱因斯坦系统评价、网状荟萃分析及使用个体参与者数据的成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(15):1-234. doi: 10.3310/HGWT3617.
8
Randomized controlled trial of adherence with single or combination inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist inhaler therapy in asthma.随机对照试验:在哮喘中使用单一或联合吸入皮质激素/长效β激动剂吸入剂治疗的依从性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Sep;126(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.033.
9
Cessation of long-acting β2-agonist in children with persistent asthma on inhaled corticosteroids.在使用吸入性糖皮质激素治疗的持续性哮喘儿童中停用长效β2激动剂
Eur Respir J. 2016 Aug;48(2):558-60. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00014-2016. Epub 2016 May 26.
10
Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.改善哮喘患者吸入性糖皮质激素依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 18;4(4):CD012226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012226.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Poorly Controlled Asthma and Factors Associated with Specialist Referral in Those with Poorly Controlled Asthma in a Paediatric Asthma Population.儿科哮喘人群中控制不佳的哮喘患病率及与控制不佳的哮喘患者专科转诊相关的因素
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Oct 3;16:1065-1075. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S428623. eCollection 2023.
2
The Efficacy of an Oral Formulation of , , and as an Add-on Therapy for Mild-to-moderate Childhood Asthma: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.一种包含[具体成分1]、[具体成分2]和[具体成分3]的口服制剂作为轻至中度儿童哮喘附加疗法的疗效:一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Mar 24;11(3):116-123. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_77_22. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
3
School-based self-management intervention using theatre to improve asthma control in adolescents: a pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial.
采用戏剧进行以学校为基础的自我管理干预以改善青少年哮喘控制:一项整群随机对照试验试点研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Mar 23;8(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01031-1.
4
Barriers and determinants of asthma control in children and adolescents in Africa: a systematic review.非洲儿童和青少年哮喘控制的障碍和决定因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 27;11(10):e053100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053100.
5
Inter-society consensus for the use of inhaled corticosteroids in infants, children and adolescents with airway diseases.《气道疾病婴幼儿、儿童和青少年使用吸入性皮质类固醇的国际共识》
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Apr 21;47(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01013-8.
6
Developing a theory-based multimedia intervention for schools to improve young people's asthma: my asthma in school (MAIS).开发一种基于理论的多媒体干预措施,用于学校以改善青少年哮喘:我的学校哮喘(MAIS)。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 2;6:122. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00670-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Achieving Control of Asthma in Children in Africa (ACACIA): protocol of an observational study of children's lung health in six sub-Saharan African countries.实现非洲儿童哮喘控制(ACACIA):一项观察性研究方案,研究撒哈拉以南非洲六个国家儿童的肺部健康状况。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e035885. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035885.
8
Theory-based self-management intervention to improve adolescents' asthma control: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.基于理论的自我管理干预以改善青少年哮喘控制:一项群组随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;9(4):e025867. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025867.
9
School-based self-management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review.针对儿童和青少年哮喘的校本自我管理干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 28;1(1):CD011651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011651.pub2.
10
What do adolescents with asthma really think about adherence to inhalers? Insights from a qualitative analysis of a UK online forum.患有哮喘的青少年对吸入器治疗依从性的真实想法是什么?来自对一个英国在线论坛的定性分析的见解。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 13;7(6):e015245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015245.