• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对HIV阳性患者中增效蛋白酶抑制剂进行治疗药物监测:血浆浓度不可测与病毒学失败风险

Therapeutic drug monitoring of boosted PIs in HIV-positive patients: undetectable plasma concentrations and risk of virological failure.

作者信息

Calcagno A, Pagani N, Ariaudo A, Arduino G, Carcieri C, D'Avolio A, Marinaro L, Tettoni M C, Trentini L, Di Perri G, Bonora S

机构信息

Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

St Stephen's AIDS Trust, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jun 1;72(6):1741-1744. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx052.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkx052
PMID:28333285
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretroviral drugs is performed in selected HIV-positive patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of undetectable plasma concentrations of ritonavir and boosted PIs and to evaluate the association between those and the 48 week risk of virological failure.

METHODS

A TDM registry study and a retrospective follow-up study were conducted. Plasma concentrations were measured through validated methods. According to PI and ritonavir concentrations, patients were stratified as adherent, partially non-adherent or non-adherent. Virological outcome was evaluated 48 weeks afterwards.

RESULTS

The TDM registry study included 2468 samples collected from 723 patients (68.1% male, median age 43.5 years). Eighty-seven samples (3.5%, 74 patients) and 68 samples (2.8%, 52 patients) were in the partially non-adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively; more patients on atazanavir/ritonavir (7.9%) versus darunavir/ritonavir (2% twice daily and 1.9% once daily) and lopinavir/ritonavir (1.5%; P  <   0.001) were observed in the partially non-adherent group. Two hundred and ninety patients were included in the follow-up study (64.1% male, median age 40 years). Patients in the adherent group had a higher chance of viral control [81.9% (167/204)] versus the partially non-adherent group and the non-adherent group [71.7% (33/46) and 53.1% (17/32), respectively; P  =   0.001]. Based on multivariate analysis, baseline HIV RNA >50 copies/mL ( P  <   0.001), genotypic susceptibility score ≤2 ( P  =   0.001), lower nadir CD4 cell count ( P  =   0.003) and not being in the adherent group ( P  =   0.029) were independent predictors of HIV RNA >50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of PI and ritonavir plasma levels can uncover incomplete compliance with treatment; TDM may represent a useful tool for identifying patients in need of adherence-promoting interventions.

摘要

背景

在部分HIV阳性患者中开展抗逆转录病毒药物的治疗药物监测(TDM)。本研究旨在估算利托那韦及增效蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)血浆浓度未检出的发生率,并评估其与48周病毒学失败风险之间的关联。

方法

开展了一项TDM登记研究及一项回顾性随访研究。通过经验证的方法测定血浆浓度。根据PI及利托那韦浓度,将患者分为依从、部分不依从或不依从。48周后评估病毒学转归。

结果

TDM登记研究纳入了从723例患者(68.1%为男性,中位年龄43.5岁)采集的2468份样本。分别有87份样本(3.5%,74例患者)及68份样本(2.8%,52例患者)属于部分不依从组及不依从组;在部分不依从组中,接受阿扎那韦/利托那韦治疗的患者更多(7.9%),而接受达芦那韦/利托那韦治疗的患者(每日2次为2%,每日1次为1.9%)及洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的患者(1.5%;P<0.001)较少。随访研究纳入了290例患者(64.1%为男性,中位年龄40岁)。依从组患者实现病毒学抑制的几率更高[81.9%(167/204)],而部分不依从组及不依从组分别为[71.7%(33/46)及53.1%(17/32);P = 0.001]。基于多变量分析,基线HIV RNA>50拷贝/mL(P<0.001)、基因型易感性评分≤2(P = 0.001)、更低的最低点CD4细胞计数(P = 0.003)以及不属于依从组(P = 0.029)是48周时HIV RNA>50拷贝/mL的独立预测因素。

结论

PI及利托那韦血浆水平的测定可发现治疗依从性不佳的情况;TDM可能是识别需要促进依从性干预措施的患者的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic drug monitoring of boosted PIs in HIV-positive patients: undetectable plasma concentrations and risk of virological failure.对HIV阳性患者中增效蛋白酶抑制剂进行治疗药物监测:血浆浓度不可测与病毒学失败风险
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jun 1;72(6):1741-1744. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx052.
2
Efficacy and safety of once-daily ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or darunavir in combination with a dual nucleos(t)ide analogue backbone in HIV-1-infected combined ART (cART)-naive patients with severe immunosuppression: a 48 week, non-comparative, randomized, multicentre trial (IMEA 040 DATA trial).每日一次利托那韦增强的阿扎那韦或达芦那韦联合双核苷(酸)类似物骨干药物用于初治的严重免疫抑制的HIV-1感染患者的抗逆转录病毒联合治疗(cART)的疗效和安全性:一项48周、非对照、随机、多中心试验(IMEA 040 DATA试验)
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Aug;71(8):2252-61. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw103. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
3
Effectiveness of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in the clinical setting: same results as in clinical trials? The PIMOCS Study Group.临床环境中利托那韦增强型蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗的有效性:与临床试验结果相同吗?PIMOCS研究组
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 May;69(5):1390-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt517. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
4
Refining criteria for selecting candidates for a safe lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy in HIV-infected virologically suppressed patients.优化在病毒学抑制的HIV感染患者中选择安全的洛匹那韦/利托那韦或达芦那韦/利托那韦单药治疗候选者的标准。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171611. eCollection 2017.
5
Cardiovascular disease and use of contemporary protease inhibitors: the D:A:D international prospective multicohort study.心血管疾病与当代蛋白酶抑制剂的使用:D:A:D 国际前瞻性多队列研究。
Lancet HIV. 2018 Jun;5(6):e291-e300. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30043-2. Epub 2018 May 3.
6
Salvage therapy with amprenavir, lopinavir and ritonavir 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d in HIV-infected patients in virological failure.在病毒学治疗失败的HIV感染患者中,使用安普那韦、洛匹那韦和利托那韦进行挽救治疗,利托那韦剂量为每日200毫克或400毫克。
Antivir Ther. 2004 Aug;9(4):615-25.
7
Impact of switching from lopinavir/ritonavir to boosted and un-boosted atazanavir on glucose metabolism: the ATAzanavir & GLUcose metabolism (ATAGLU) study.从洛匹那韦/利托那韦转换为增强和非增强型阿扎那韦对糖代谢的影响:阿扎那韦与糖代谢(ATAGLU)研究
Int J STD AIDS. 2016 Jul;27(8):638-43. doi: 10.1177/0956462415590724. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Effectiveness of efavirenz compared with ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor-based regimens as initial therapy for patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA above 100,000 copies/ml.与基于利托那韦增强型蛋白酶抑制剂的治疗方案相比,依非韦伦作为血浆HIV-1 RNA高于100,000拷贝/毫升患者初始治疗的有效性。
Antivir Ther. 2014;19(6):569-77. doi: 10.3851/IMP2736. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
9
Efficacy of protease inhibitor monotherapy vs. triple therapy: meta-analysis of data from 2303 patients in 13 randomized trials.蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗与三联疗法的疗效:对13项随机试验中2303例患者数据的荟萃分析。
HIV Med. 2016 May;17(5):358-67. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12348. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
10
Virological characterization of patients failing darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir treatment in the ARTEMIS study: 96-week analysis.ARTEMIS研究中达芦那韦/利托那韦或洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗失败患者的病毒学特征:96周分析
Antivir Ther. 2011;16(1):99-108. doi: 10.3851/IMP1719.

引用本文的文献

1
The significance of therapeutic drug monitoring in detecting low medication adherence in patients with cancer: A case study of cabozantinib.治疗药物监测在检测癌症患者低药物依从性中的意义:卡博替尼的病例研究
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Sep 20;12(9):e9462. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9462. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Optimizing Pediatric Dosing Recommendations and Treatment Management of Antiretroviral Drugs Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Children Living With HIV.利用治疗药物监测数据优化儿童抗逆转录病毒药物的给药建议和治疗管理,以治疗 HIV 感染者。
Ther Drug Monit. 2019 Aug;41(4):431-443. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000637.
3
Darunavir Population Pharmacokinetic Model Based on HIV Outpatient Data.
基于HIV门诊数据的达芦那韦群体药代动力学模型。
Ther Drug Monit. 2019 Feb;41(1):59-65. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000576.
4
Lopinavir serum concentrations of critically ill infants: a pharmacokinetic investigation in South Africa.危重症婴儿洛匹那韦血清浓度:南非的一项药代动力学研究。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2018 Nov;207(5-6):339-343. doi: 10.1007/s00430-018-0550-5. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
Risk factors contributing to a low darunavir plasma concentration.导致达芦那韦血浆浓度低的相关危险因素。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;84(3):456-461. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13464. Epub 2017 Dec 7.