Tamm Leanne, Denton Carolyn A, Epstein Jeffery N, Schatschneider Christopher, Taylor Heather, Arnold L Eugene, Bukstein Oscar, Anixt Julia, Koshy Anson, Newman Nicholas C, Maltinsky Jan, Brinson Patricia, Loren Richard E A, Prasad Mary R, Ewing-Cobbs Linda, Vaughn Aaron
Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):434-446. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000170. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
This trial compared attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment alone, intensive reading intervention alone, and their combination for children with ADHD and word reading difficulties and disabilities (RD).
Children (n = 216; predominantly African American males) in Grades 2-5 with ADHD and word reading/decoding deficits were randomized to ADHD treatment (medication + parent training), reading treatment (reading instruction), or combined ADHD + reading treatment. Outcomes were parent and teacher ADHD ratings and measures of word reading/decoding. Analyses utilized a mixed models covariate-adjusted gain score approach with posttest regressed onto pretest.
Inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity outcomes were significantly better in the ADHD (parent Hedges's g = .87/.75; teacher g = .67/.50) and combined (parent g = 1.06/.95; teacher g = .36/41) treatment groups than reading treatment alone; the ADHD and Combined groups did not differ significantly (parent g = .19/.20; teacher g = .31/.09). Word reading and decoding outcomes were significantly better in the reading (word reading g = .23; decoding g = .39) and combined (word reading g = .32; decoding g = .39) treatment groups than ADHD treatment alone; reading and combined groups did not differ (word reading g = .09; decoding g = .00). Significant group differences were maintained at the 3- to 5-month follow-up on all outcomes except word reading.
Children with ADHD and RD benefit from specific treatment of each disorder. ADHD treatment is associated with more improvement in ADHD symptoms than RD treatment, and reading instruction is associated with better word reading and decoding outcomes than ADHD treatment. The additive value of combining treatments was not significant within disorder, but the combination allows treating both disorders simultaneously. (PsycINFO Database Record
本试验比较了单纯注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)治疗、单纯强化阅读干预以及二者结合对患有ADHD且存在单词阅读困难和障碍(RD)的儿童的效果。
将2 - 5年级患有ADHD且有单词阅读/解码缺陷的儿童(n = 216;主要为非裔美国男性)随机分为ADHD治疗组(药物治疗 + 家长培训)、阅读治疗组(阅读指导)或ADHD + 阅读联合治疗组。结果指标为家长和教师对ADHD的评分以及单词阅读/解码测量。分析采用混合模型协变量调整增益分数法,将后测结果回归到前测结果上。
在注意力不集中和多动/冲动结果方面,ADHD治疗组(家长的Hedges's g = 0.87/0.75;教师的g = 0.67/0.50)和联合治疗组(家长的g = 1.06/0.95;教师的g = 0.36/0.41)显著优于单纯阅读治疗组;ADHD治疗组和联合治疗组之间无显著差异(家长的g = 0.19/0.20;教师的g = 0.31/0.09)。在单词阅读和解码结果方面,阅读治疗组(单词阅读g = 0.23;解码g = 0.39)和联合治疗组(单词阅读g = 0.32;解码g = 0.39)显著优于单纯ADHD治疗组;阅读治疗组和联合治疗组之间无差异(单词阅读g = 0.09;解码g = 0.00)。除单词阅读外,所有结果在3至5个月随访时的显著组间差异均得以维持。
患有ADHD和RD的儿童从每种疾病的特异性治疗中获益。ADHD治疗比RD治疗在改善ADHD症状方面更有效,阅读指导比ADHD治疗在单词阅读和解码结果方面更优。联合治疗在单一疾病内的附加价值不显著,但联合治疗可同时治疗两种疾病。(PsycINFO数据库记录