Pratt Bridget, Paul Amy, Hyder Adnan A, Ali Joseph
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 161 Barry St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Jul 1;32(6):890-910. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx003.
Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is increasingly funded and undertaken as part of health system strengthening efforts worldwide. HPSR ethics is also a relatively new and emerging field, with numerous normative and descriptive questions that have largely not been considered. Normative questions include what ethical principles and values should guide HPSR. Descriptive questions include what ethical concerns arise when conducting HPSR. A small but growing body of scholarly work characterizes the various ethics issues inherent in HPSR. Towards informing the future development of ethics guidance for HPSR, a scoping review was undertaken to: (1) identify the range of ethics issues relevant to the conduct of HPSR-with a deliberate (though not exclusive) focus on low- and middle-income country settings and (2) describe existing guidance on key ethics issues relevant to HPSR. Using the Cochrane methods as a basis, the review identified formal and informal literature on HPSR ethics by searching the following databases: PubMed's Medline, Embase, Global Health, Scopus, WHO Global Health Regional Libraries, LILACs, OpenDOAR and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine. In total, 11 062 documents were identified from the formal (10 519) and informal (543) literature. One hundred and seven of these documents (formal 99 and informal 8) met at least one inclusion criterion and underwent thematic analysis. Ethical issues in four main categories were identified: upholding autonomy, identifying and balancing risks and benefits, justice and determination of ethical review requirements. The review indicated that the ethical values behind HPSR place an emphasis on its contributing to the reduction of health disparities. Unsurprisingly then, numerous ethical concerns relating to justice arise in HPSR. However, the majority of existing guidance focuses on obtaining or waiving informed consent and, thus, appears to be insufficient for HPSR. A list of priority ethics issues in HPSR in need of guidance development is provided.
作为全球卫生系统强化工作的一部分,卫生政策与系统研究(HPSR)获得的资金支持日益增加,开展得也越来越多。HPSR伦理学也是一个相对较新的新兴领域,有许多规范性和描述性问题在很大程度上尚未得到考虑。规范性问题包括哪些伦理原则和价值观应指导HPSR。描述性问题包括开展HPSR时会出现哪些伦理问题。一小部分但数量不断增加的学术著作描述了HPSR中固有的各种伦理问题。为了为HPSR伦理指导的未来发展提供信息,开展了一项范围综述,以:(1)确定与开展HPSR相关的伦理问题范围——特意(但并非排他性地)侧重于低收入和中等收入国家的情况,以及(2)描述与HPSR相关的关键伦理问题的现有指导意见。该综述以Cochrane方法为基础,通过搜索以下数据库来识别关于HPSR伦理的正式和非正式文献:PubMed的Medline、Embase、全球卫生、Scopus、世卫组织全球卫生区域图书馆、LILACs、OpenDOAR和比勒费尔德学术搜索引擎。从正式(10519篇)和非正式(543篇)文献中总共识别出11062份文件。其中107份文件(正式99份,非正式8份)符合至少一项纳入标准并进行了主题分析。确定了四个主要类别的伦理问题:维护自主性、识别和平衡风险与益处、正义以及伦理审查要求的确定。该综述表明,HPSR背后的伦理价值观强调其对减少健康差距的贡献。因此,HPSR中出现了许多与正义相关的伦理问题也就不足为奇了。然而,大多数现有指导意见侧重于获取或放弃知情同意,因此似乎不足以应对HPSR。提供了一份HPSR中需要制定指导意见的优先伦理问题清单。