Suppr超能文献

促进撒哈拉以南非洲地区的研究诚信:挑战、机遇与建议。

Fostering research integrity in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Dec 7;43:182. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.182.37804. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Integrity and adherence to appropriate ethical standards are important elements of research. These standards are key to protecting research participants´ rights as well as ensuring the reliability and quality of research outputs. Although empirical evidence is scanty, several authors have alluded to the fact that violation of research integrity standards could be common in low- and middle-income countries including sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Understanding the issues, challenges, and opportunities of research integrity and ethics in SSA is key to promoting the responsible conduct of research and the protection of research participants. This paper presents the authors´ critical views and recommendations on the current state of research integrity in SSA. We argue that understanding the current research integrity architecture in SSA has the potential to identify opportunities to promote responsible conduct of research in SSA. Such opportunities include, but are not limited to transparency, accountability, and reproducibility of research, which collectively lead to enhanced public trust in the research enterprise. We highlight the need to embrace equity, fairness, diversity, and inclusivity in the research cycle from conception (priority setting), funding, implementation, dissemination of findings, and scale up. We move on to provide a rationale for understanding the differences and similarities between research ethics and research integrity. Governments, research, and academic institutions must develop multifaceted approaches to promote compliance with principles of research integrity by developing and implementing clear research integrity policies and guidelines that foster responsible conduct of research and prioritize capacity building and empowerment of early career researchers, students, and other targeted key stakeholders.

摘要

诚信和遵守适当的道德标准是研究的重要要素。这些标准是保护研究参与者权利以及确保研究成果可靠性和质量的关键。尽管实证证据很少,但有几位作者提到,违反研究诚信标准在包括撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)在内的低收入和中等收入国家可能很常见。了解 SSA 研究诚信和道德的问题、挑战和机遇,对于促进负责任的研究行为和保护研究参与者至关重要。本文介绍了作者对 SSA 研究诚信现状的批判性观点和建议。我们认为,了解 SSA 目前的研究诚信架构有可能确定促进 SSA 负责任研究行为的机会。这些机会包括但不限于研究的透明度、问责制和可重复性,这些都有助于增强公众对研究事业的信任。我们强调需要在研究周期从构思(优先事项设定)、资金、实施、研究结果传播到扩大规模的各个环节中,体现公平、公正、多样性和包容性。我们接着提供了一个理解研究伦理和研究诚信之间差异和相似之处的理由。政府、研究和学术机构必须制定多方面的方法,通过制定和实施明确的研究诚信政策和准则,促进对研究诚信原则的遵守,培养负责任的研究行为,并优先考虑能力建设和授权早期职业研究人员、学生和其他目标关键利益攸关方。

相似文献

6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Ethics and the AIDS pandemic in the developing world.发展中世界的伦理与艾滋病大流行
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2003 Apr-Jun;2(2):81-7. doi: 10.1177/154510970300200205.

本文引用的文献

5
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.《评估研究人员的香港原则:促进研究诚信》
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.科学家行为不端?行业和大学内的一项调查。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1697-1717. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9957-4. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验