Homer Caroline S E, Turkmani Sabera, Rumsey Michele
Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Development, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Women Birth. 2017 Jun;30(3):193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
Strengthening midwifery is a global priority. Recently, global evidence has provided momentum toward developing the midwifery workforce. In 2014, the State of the World's Midwifery 2014 Report explored midwifery services in 73 low to middle income countries. In the South Pacific region, only Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands were included. This means that there is little known on the state of midwifery in the small island countries in the South Pacific.
To explore the current situation of the education, regulation and association of midwives in 12 small island nations of the South Pacific and determine the gaps in these areas.
A descriptive study was undertaken. Data were collected through a survey completed by key representatives (usually the Chief Nursing and Midwifery Officer) from each of the 12 countries. Ethical approval was received from the relevant Human Research Ethics Committee.
Many of the countries had few midwives, in some instances, only two midwives for the whole country. Midwifery education programs included post-graduate diploma, certificates and bachelor degrees. Midwives were required to be registered nurses in all countries. Regulation and licensing also varied - most countries did not have a separate licensing system for midwives. Only three countries have a specific professional association for midwives.
The variation and the small number of midwives poses challenges for workforce planning. Consideration could be given to developing regional standards and potentially a shared curriculum framework. Ongoing collaboration and networking between countries is a critical part of future developments.
加强助产工作是一项全球优先事项。最近,全球范围内的证据为发展助产士队伍提供了动力。2014年,《2014年世界助产士状况报告》探讨了73个低收入和中等收入国家的助产服务情况。在南太平洋地区,仅包括巴布亚新几内亚和所罗门群岛。这意味着对南太平洋小岛屿国家的助产士状况了解甚少。
探讨南太平洋12个小岛屿国家助产士的教育、监管和协会的现状,并确定这些领域存在的差距。
开展了一项描述性研究。数据通过对12个国家的关键代表(通常是首席护理和助产士官员)完成的一项调查收集。获得了相关人类研究伦理委员会的伦理批准。
许多国家的助产士数量很少,在某些情况下,整个国家只有两名助产士。助产士教育项目包括研究生文凭、证书和学士学位。所有国家都要求助产士为注册护士。监管和许可情况也各不相同——大多数国家没有针对助产士的单独许可制度。只有三个国家有助产士的特定专业协会。
助产士数量的差异和稀少给劳动力规划带来了挑战。可以考虑制定区域标准以及可能的共享课程框架。各国之间持续的合作和网络建设是未来发展的关键部分。