Suppr超能文献

不同伤口敷料对浅Ⅱ度烧伤患者的比较效果:一项系统评价和贝叶斯框架网络荟萃分析的研究方案

Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Jiang Qiong, Chen Zhao-Hong, Wang Shun-Bin, Chen Xiao-Dong

机构信息

Fujian Burns Institute, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 22;7(3):e013289. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Selecting a suitable wound dressing for patients with partial-thickness burns (PTBs) is important in wound care. However, the comparative effectiveness of different dressings has not been studied. We report the protocol of a network meta-analysis designed to combine direct and indirect evidence of wound dressings in the management of PTB.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the wound-healing effect of a wound dressing in the management of PTB. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register and CINAHL. A comprehensive search strategy is developed to retrieve articles reporting potentially eligible RCTs. Besides, we will contact the experts in the field and review the conference proceedings to locate non-published studies. The reference lists of articles will be reviewed for any candidate studies. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts of the candidate articles. All eligible RCTs will be obtained in full text to perform a review. Disagreement on eligibility of an RCT will be solved by group discussion. The information of participants, interventions, comparisons and outcomes from included RCTs will be recorded and summarised. The primary outcome is time to complete wound healing. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of burns completely healed at the end of treatment, change in wound surface area at the end of treatment, incidence of adverse events, etc.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The result of this review will provide evidence for the comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings in the management of PTB. It will also facilitate decision-making in choosing a suitable wound dressing. We will disseminate the review through a peer-review journal and conference abstracts or posters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42016041574; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

为部分厚度烧伤(PTB)患者选择合适的伤口敷料在伤口护理中至关重要。然而,不同敷料的相对有效性尚未得到研究。我们报告一项网状荟萃分析的方案,旨在综合直接和间接证据,以评估伤口敷料在PTB管理中的作用。

方法与分析

我们将检索评估伤口敷料在PTB管理中伤口愈合效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索将在MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库和CINAHL中进行。制定全面的检索策略以检索报告潜在合格RCT的文章。此外,我们将联系该领域的专家并查阅会议记录以查找未发表的研究。将查阅文章的参考文献列表以寻找任何候选研究。两名独立的评审员将筛选候选文章的标题和摘要。将获取所有符合条件的RCT的全文以进行综述。关于RCT合格性的分歧将通过小组讨论解决。将记录并总结纳入RCT的参与者、干预措施、对照和结局的信息。主要结局是伤口完全愈合的时间。次要结局包括治疗结束时烧伤完全愈合的比例、治疗结束时伤口表面积的变化、不良事件的发生率等。

伦理与传播

本综述的结果将为不同伤口敷料在PTB管理中的相对有效性提供证据。它还将有助于在选择合适的伤口敷料时做出决策。我们将通过同行评审期刊以及会议摘要或海报来传播本综述。

试验注册号

PROSPERO CRD42016041574;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ba/5372024/f1a7b5159a58/bmjopen2016013289f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验