Suppr超能文献

上皮性卵巢肿瘤患者二次剖腹探查术中发现的苗勒管包涵体的意义。

The significance of müllerian inclusions found at second-look laparotomy in patients with epithelial ovarian neoplasms.

作者信息

Copeland L J, Silva E G, Gershenson D M, Sneige N, Atkinson E N, Wharton J T

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1988 May;71(5):763-70.

PMID:2833713
Abstract

When no visible tumor is identified at second-look laparotomy, selected biopsy specimens or cytologic washings may reveal microscopic tumor or benign pathologic atypia. The pathology material from 311 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had no macroscopic tumor at second-look laparotomy was evaluated for psammoma bodies, müllerian inclusions (benign glandular inclusions), microscopic tumor, and either inflammation or fibrosis. Progression-free intervals and survival rates were influenced by the presence of müllerian inclusions (favorably), tumor or positive cytology (unfavorably), and inflammation or fibrosis (unfavorably). Multivariate analysis (proportional hazards model) demonstrated that both the progression-free interval and survival rates were influenced significantly by the presence of microscopic tumor and tumor grade. Of 51 patients with müllerian inclusions and no microscopic tumor, 23 received additional treatment after second-look laparotomy. No differences were noted in the progression-free interval or survival rates when these patients were compared with the 28 nontreated patients. Of the treated patients, three died from chemotherapy toxicity, whereas there were no chemotherapy-related deaths in the nontreated group. These findings indicate that the presence of müllerian inclusions at second-look laparotomy does not justify treatment, and that further treatment after misinterpretation of these benign pathologic entities may lead to harmful results.

摘要

在二次剖腹探查术中未发现可见肿瘤时,选取的活检标本或细胞学冲洗液可能会显示微小肿瘤或良性病理异型性。对311例上皮性卵巢癌患者的病理材料进行了评估,这些患者在二次剖腹探查术中未发现宏观肿瘤,评估内容包括砂粒体、苗勒管包涵体(良性腺性包涵体)、微小肿瘤以及炎症或纤维化。无进展生存期和生存率受到苗勒管包涵体(有利)、肿瘤或阳性细胞学结果(不利)以及炎症或纤维化(不利)的影响。多因素分析(比例风险模型)表明,微小肿瘤的存在和肿瘤分级均对无进展生存期和生存率有显著影响。在51例有苗勒管包涵体且无微小肿瘤的患者中,23例在二次剖腹探查术后接受了额外治疗。将这些患者与28例未接受治疗的患者进行比较时,未发现无进展生存期或生存率存在差异。在接受治疗的患者中,3例死于化疗毒性,而未治疗组未出现与化疗相关的死亡病例。这些发现表明,二次剖腹探查术中存在苗勒管包涵体并不能作为治疗的依据,对这些良性病理实体的错误解读后进行进一步治疗可能会导致有害结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验