Commentary: Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives.
作者信息
Schlinger Henry D
机构信息
Department of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 9;8:360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00360. eCollection 2017.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives.评论：能否高保真地捕捉内心体验？从多个视角审视大脑激活与体验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 9;8:360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00360. eCollection 2017.
2
Response: Commentary: Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives.回应：评论：能否高保真地捕捉内在体验？从多个视角审视大脑激活与体验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 25;8:628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00628. eCollection 2017.
3
Commentary: Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives.评论：能否高保真地理解内在体验？从多个视角审视大脑激活与体验。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;9:1243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01243. eCollection 2018.
4
Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives.能否高保真地捕捉内心体验？从多个视角审视大脑激活与体验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 27;8:43. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00043. eCollection 2017.
5
Pristine Inner Experience and Descriptive Experience Sampling: Implications for Psychology.纯粹的内在体验与描述性体验抽样：对心理学的启示
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 12;8:2170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02170. eCollection 2017.
6
Investigating pristine inner experience: implications for experience sampling and questionnaires.探究原初内在体验：对体验抽样法和问卷调查的启示
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jan;31:148-59. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI?扫描器中的内在体验：高保真的内在体验感知能否与 fMRI 结合？
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 9;5:1393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01393. eCollection 2014.
8
A complete, unabridged, "pre-registered" descriptive experience sampling investigation: The case of Lena.一项完整、未删节的“预注册”描述性经验抽样调查：莉娜的案例。
Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2023;22(1):267-287. doi: 10.1007/s11097-021-09763-w. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
9
Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking.走向内在言说的现象学。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Dec;22(4):1477-94. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
10
Affording introspection: an alternative model of inner awareness.提供内省：一种内在觉知的替代模型。
Philos Stud. 2015;172(9):2469-2492. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0421-x.
引用本文的文献
1
Response: Commentary: Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives.回应：评论：能否高保真地捕捉内在体验？从多个视角审视大脑激活与体验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 25;8:628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00628. eCollection 2017.
本文引用的文献
1
Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives.能否高保真地捕捉内心体验？从多个视角审视大脑激活与体验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 27;8:43. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00043. eCollection 2017.
2
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.聚类失效：为何功能磁共振成像在空间范围推断上存在过高的假阳性率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 12;113(28):7900-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602413113. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
3
Some clarifications on the role of inner speech in consciousness.关于内部言语在意识中的作用的一些澄清。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):530-1. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
4
The phenomena of inner experience.内在体验的现象
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):798-810. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
5
How something can be said about telling more than we can know: on choice blindness and introspection.关于说出的内容超出我们所知的情况：论选择盲视与内省。
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):673-92; discussion 693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
6
Telling what we know: describing inner experience.讲述我们所知：描述内心体验。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Sep 1;5(9):400-403. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01724-1.
Zotero 插件