Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Apr;12(2):585-612. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9708-9.
This review seeks to summarize diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies that have evaluated structural changes attributed to the mechanisms of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in adult civilian, military, and athlete populations. Articles from 2002 to 2016 were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar, using a Boolean search string containing the following terms: "diffusion tensor imaging", "diffusion imaging", "DTI", "white matter", "concussion", "mild traumatic brain injury", "mTBI", "traumatic brain injury", and "TBI". We added studies not identified by this method that were found via manually-searched reference lists. We identified 86 eligible studies from English-language journals using, adult, human samples. Studies were evaluated based on duration between injury and DTI assessment, categorized as acute, subacute/chronic, remote mTBI, and repetitive brain trauma considerations. Since changes in brain structure after mTBI can also be affected by other co-occurring medical and demographic factors, we also briefly review DTI studies that have addressed socioeconomic status factors (SES), major depressive disorder (MDD), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The review describes population-specific risks and the complications of clinical versus pathophysiological outcomes of mTBI. We had anticipated that the distinct population groups (civilian, military, and athlete) would require separate consideration, and various aspects of the study characteristics supported this. In general, study results suggested widespread but inconsistent differences in white matter diffusion metrics (primarily fractional anisotropy [FA], mean diffusivity [MD], radial diffusivity [RD], and axial diffusivity [AD]) following mTBI/concussion. Inspection of study designs and results revealed potential explanations for discrepant DTI findings, such as control group variability, analytic techniques, the manner in which regional differences were reported, and the presence or absence of persistent functional disturbances. DTI research in adult mTBI would benefit from more standardized imaging and analytic approaches. We also found significant overlap in white matter abnormalities reported in mTBI with those commonly affected by SES or the presence of MDD and ADHD. We conclude that DTI is sensitive to a wide range of group differences in diffusion metrics, but that it currently lacks the specificity necessary for meaningful clinical application. Properly controlled longitudinal studies with consistent and standardized functional outcomes are needed before establishing the utility of DTI in the clinical management of mTBI and concussion.
这篇综述旨在总结扩散张量成像(DTI)研究,这些研究评估了成人平民、军人和运动员群体中与轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)机制相关的结构变化。从 2002 年到 2016 年,从 PubMed/MEDLINE、EBSCOhost 和 Google Scholar 检索到文章,使用包含以下术语的布尔搜索字符串:“扩散张量成像”、“扩散成像”、“DTI”、“白质”、“脑震荡”、“轻度创伤性脑损伤”、“mTBI”、“创伤性脑损伤”和“TBI”。我们还添加了通过手动搜索参考文献列表找到的未通过该方法识别的研究。我们从英文期刊中确定了 86 项符合条件的研究,这些研究均使用成人和人类样本。研究是基于损伤和 DTI 评估之间的时间来评估的,分为急性、亚急性/慢性、远程 mTBI 和重复脑创伤考虑。由于 mTBI 后大脑结构的变化也可能受到其他并发的医疗和人口统计学因素的影响,我们还简要回顾了 DTI 研究,这些研究探讨了社会经济地位因素(SES)、重度抑郁症(MDD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)。该综述描述了特定人群的风险以及 mTBI 的临床和病理生理结果的并发症。我们预计不同的人群群体(平民、军人和运动员)需要单独考虑,研究特征的各个方面都支持这一点。一般来说,研究结果表明,在 mTBI/脑震荡后,白质扩散指标(主要是各向异性分数[FA]、平均扩散系数[MD]、径向扩散系数[RD]和轴向扩散系数[AD])存在广泛但不一致的差异。对研究设计和结果的检查为 DTI 发现的差异提供了潜在的解释,例如对照组的变异性、分析技术、报告区域差异的方式以及持续存在的功能障碍。成人 mTBI 的 DTI 研究将受益于更标准化的成像和分析方法。我们还发现,mTBI 报告的白质异常与 SES 或 MDD 和 ADHD 常见的白质异常有显著重叠。我们得出的结论是,DTI 对白质扩散指标的广泛群体差异很敏感,但目前缺乏有意义的临床应用所需的特异性。在确定 DTI 在 mTBI 和脑震荡的临床管理中的效用之前,需要进行具有一致和标准化功能结果的适当对照纵向研究。