Lippa Sara M, Yeh Ping-Hong, Ollinger John, Brickell Tracey A, French Louis M, Lange Rael T
National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Feb;40(3-4):260-273. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0276. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
The extant literature investigating the relationship between diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and cognition following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is limited by small sample sizes and inappropriate control groups. The present study examined DTI metric differences between service members and veterans (SMVs) with bodily injury (Trauma Control; TC), uncomplicated mild TBI (mTBI), complicated mild TBI (compTBI), and severe-moderate TBI combined (smTBI), and how DTI metrics related to cognition within each group. Participants were 226 SMVs (56 TC, 112 mTBI, 29 compTBI, 29 smTBI) with valid neuropsychological testing and DTI at least 11 months post-injury. The smTBI group demonstrated decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) and increased axial diffusivity (AD), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD) of the cerebral white matter (CWM) and several individual white matter tracts compared with the TC, mTBI, and compTBI groups (all s < 0.05; s = 0.17 to 0.49). The TC, mTBI, and compTBI groups did not differ in terms of any DTI metrics. Within the smTBI group, FA, AD, MD, and RD of the total CWM and several white matter tracts were related to Processing Speed (|s|: 0.43 to 0.66; s < 0.05), and/or Delayed Memory (|s|: 0.41 to 0.67; s < 0.05). In the compTBI group, Processing Speed was related to left arcuate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) FA, MD, and RD, as well as left uncinate fasciculus MD and RD. In contrast, there were no significant relationships between DTI metrics and cognition/emotional functioning within the mTBI or TC groups. Overall, findings suggest a dose-response relationship between TBI severity and the strength of the relationship between white matter integrity and cognitive performance, with essentially no relationship in mTBI, some findings in compTBI, and several strongly significant relationships in smTBI. In contrast to previously reported findings, there were no differences in DTI metrics between controls, mTBI, and compTBI, and DTI metrics were unrelated to cognition in our relatively large mTBI group.
现有研究创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后弥散张量成像(DTI)与认知之间关系的文献,受样本量小和对照组设置不当的限制。本研究检查了身体受伤的现役军人和退伍军人(SMV)(创伤对照组;TC)、单纯性轻度TBI(mTBI)、复杂性轻度TBI(compTBI)以及重度-中度TBI合并组(smTBI)之间的DTI指标差异,以及每组中DTI指标与认知的关系。研究对象为226名SMV(56名TC、112名mTBI、29名compTBI、29名smTBI),他们在受伤后至少11个月进行了有效的神经心理学测试和DTI检查。与TC、mTBI和compTBI组相比,smTBI组大脑白质(CWM)和几条单独的白质束的分数各向异性(FA)降低,轴向扩散率(AD)、平均扩散率(MD)和径向扩散率(RD)升高(所有P<0.05;P=0.17至0.49)。TC、mTBI和compTBI组在任何DTI指标方面均无差异。在smTBI组中,总CWM和几条白质束的FA、AD、MD和RD与处理速度(|r|:0.43至0.66;P<0.05)和/或延迟记忆(|r|:0.41至0.67;P<0.05)相关。在compTBI组中,处理速度与左弓状束和上纵束(SLF)的FA、MD和RD以及左钩束的MD和RD相关。相比之下,在mTBI或TC组中,DTI指标与认知/情绪功能之间没有显著关系。总体而言,研究结果表明TBI严重程度与白质完整性和认知表现之间关系的强度呈剂量反应关系,在mTBI中基本无关系,在compTBI中有一些发现,在smTBI中有几个显著关系。与先前报道的结果相反,对照组、mTBI和compTBI之间的DTI指标没有差异,并且在我们相对较大的mTBI组中,DTI指标与认知无关。