McCann Catherine
Glasgow Dental Hospital/Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow, Scotland.
Evid Based Dent. 2017 Mar;18(1):17-18. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401220.
Data sourcesCochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, LILACS, ISI Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.Study selectionRandomised controlled clinical trials of analgesics given before dental treatment versus placebo or no analgesics in children and adolescents up to 17 years of age. Children and adolescents having dental treatment under sedation (including nitrous oxide/oxygen) or general anaesthesia were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently selected studies, abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Standard Cochrane methodological approaches were used.ResultsFive trials involving 190 patients were included. None of the studies were at low risk of bias. Three trials involved dental treatment and two involved orthodontic treatment. Three of the included trials compared paracetamol with placebo. Meta-analysis of the two trials showed no evidence of a benefit in taking paracetamol preoperatively; (RR) for postoperative pain of 0.81 (95%CI; 0.53 to 1.22). Four trials compared ibuprofen with placebo. Pooled data from two studies showed a statistically significant mean difference in severity of postoperative pain of -13.44 (95%CI; -23.01 to -3.88) on a visual analogue scale (0 to 100), which indicated a probable benefit. Both trials were at high risk of bias and the quality of the evidence is low.ConclusionsFrom the available evidence, we cannot determine whether or not preoperative analgesics are of benefit in paediatric dentistry for procedures under local anaesthetic. There is probably a benefit in using preoperative analgesics prior to orthodontic separator placement. The quality of the evidence is low. Further randomised clinical trials should be completed with appropriate sample sizes and well defined outcome measures.
数据来源
考克兰口腔健康小组试验注册库、考克兰对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区卫生科学数据库(LILACS)、科学网(ISI Web of Science)、美国国立医学图书馆临床试验数据库(ClinicalTrials.gov)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台。
研究选择
针对17岁及以下儿童和青少年在牙科治疗前给予镇痛药与安慰剂或不使用镇痛药的随机对照临床试验。排除在镇静(包括氧化亚氮/氧气)或全身麻醉下接受牙科治疗的儿童和青少年。
数据提取与综合分析
两名评价员独立选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。采用标准的考克兰方法学。
结果
纳入了5项涉及190例患者的试验。没有一项研究的偏倚风险较低。3项试验涉及牙科治疗,2项涉及正畸治疗。纳入的3项试验将对乙酰氨基酚与安慰剂进行了比较。对两项试验的荟萃分析表明,没有证据显示术前服用对乙酰氨基酚有益;术后疼痛的相对危险度(RR)为0.81(95%置信区间[CI]:0.53至1.22)。4项试验将布洛芬与安慰剂进行了比较。两项研究的汇总数据显示,在视觉模拟量表(0至100)上,术后疼痛严重程度的平均差异具有统计学意义,为-13.44(95%CI:-23.01至-3.88),这表明可能有益。两项试验的偏倚风险均较高,证据质量较低。
结论
根据现有证据,我们无法确定术前镇痛药在小儿牙科局部麻醉手术中是否有益。在放置正畸分离器之前使用术前镇痛药可能有益。证据质量较低。应完成样本量适当且结局指标明确的进一步随机临床试验。