Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Nov 1;12(10):1385-1391. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0451. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
Since the aim of the men's team pursuit in time-trial track cycling is to accomplish a distance of 4000 m as fast as possible, optimizing aerodynamic drag can contribute to achieving this goal. The aim of this study was to determine the drafting effect in second, third, and fourth position during the team pursuit in track cycling as a function of the team members' individual frontal areas in order to minimize the required power.
Eight experienced track cyclists of the Dutch national selection performed 39 trials of 3 km in different teams of 4 cyclists at a constant velocity of 15.75 m/s. Frontal projected areas were determined, and together with field-derived drag coefficients for all 4 positions, the relationships between frontal areas of team members and drag fractions were estimated using generalized estimating equations.
The frontal area of both the cyclist directly in front of the drafter and the drafter himself turned out to be significant determinants of the drag fraction at the drafter's position (P < .05) for all 3 drafting positions. Predicted required power for individuals in drafting positions differed up to 35 W depending on team composition. For a team, a maximal difference in team efficiency (1.2%) exists by selecting cyclists in a specific sequence.
Estimating required power for a specific team composition gives insight into differences in team efficiency for the team pursuit. Furthermore, required power for individual team members ranges substantially depending on team composition.
由于男子团体追逐计时赛的目标是尽可能快地完成 4000 米的距离,因此优化空气动力阻力有助于实现这一目标。本研究的目的是确定在团队追逐中第二、第三和第四位置的跟随效果,作为团队成员个人正面区域的函数,以最小化所需的功率。
8 名经验丰富的荷兰国家选拔队的场地自行车运动员在不同的 4 人车队中以 15.75 m/s 的恒定速度进行了 39 次 3 公里的试验。确定了正面投影面积,并与所有 4 个位置的现场得出的阻力系数一起,使用广义估计方程估计了团队成员的正面区域与阻力分数之间的关系。
对于所有 3 个跟随位置,直接在跟随者前面的自行车运动员和跟随者本人的正面区域都被证明是跟随者位置的阻力分数的重要决定因素(P <.05)。根据团队组成,跟随位置的个体所需的预测功率差异可达 35 W。对于一个团队,通过选择特定顺序的自行车运动员,团队效率(1.2%)存在最大差异。
估计特定团队组成所需的功率可以深入了解团队追逐中团队效率的差异。此外,根据团队组成,个体团队成员所需的功率差异很大。