Suppr超能文献

伽玛刀和 LINAC 治疗脑转移瘤的放射外科治疗:回顾性单中心研究比较。

Radiosurgery in the management of brain metastasis: a retrospective single-center study comparing Gamma Knife and LINAC treatment.

机构信息

1Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, and.

2Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS 5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):352-361. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161480. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The authors present a retrospective analysis of a single-center experience with treatment of brain metastases using Gamma Knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC)-based radiosurgery and compare the results. METHODS From July 2010 to July 2012, 63 patients with brain metastases were treated with radiosurgery. Among them, 28 (with 83 lesions) were treated with a GK unit and 35 (with 47 lesions) with a LINAC. The primary outcome was local progression-free survival (LPFS), evaluated on a per-lesion basis. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS), evaluated per patient. Statistical analysis included standard tests and Cox regression with shared-frailty models to account for the within-patient correlation. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 11.7 months (median 7.9 months, range 1.7-32 months) for GK and 18.1 months (median 17 months, range 7.5-28.7 months) for LINAC. The median number of lesions per patient was 2.5 (range 1-9) in the GK group and 1 (range 1-3) in the LINAC group (p < 0.01, 2-sample t-test). There were more radioresistant lesions (e.g., melanoma) and more lesions located in functional areas in the GK group. Additional technical reasons for choosing GK instead of LINAC were limitations of LINAC movements, especially if lesions were located in the lower posterior fossa or multiple lesions were close to highly functional areas (e.g., the brainstem), precluding optimal dosimetry with LINAC. The median marginal dose was 24 Gy with GK and 20 Gy with LINAC (p < 0.01, 2-sample t-test). For GK, the actuarial LPFS rate at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 17 months was 96.96%, 96.96%, 96.96%, 88.1%, and 81.5%, remaining stable until 32 months. For LINAC the rate at 3, 6, 12, 17, 24, and 33 months was 91.5%, 91.5%, 91.5%, 79.9%, 55.5%, and 17.1% (log-rank p = 0.03). In the Cox regression with shared-frailty model, the risk of local progression in the LINAC group was almost twice that of the GK group (HR 1.92, p > 0.05). The mean OS was 16.0 months (95% CI 11.2-20.9 months) in the GK group, compared with 20.9 months (95% CI 16.4-25.3 months) in the LINAC group. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that a lower graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score, noncontrolled systemic status at last radiological assessment, and older age were associated with lower OS; after adjustment of these covariables by Cox regression, the OS was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study comparing GK and LINAC-based radiosurgery for brain metastases, patients with more severe disease were treated by GK, including those harboring lesions of greater number, of radioresistant type, or in highly functional areas. The risk of local progression for the LINAC group was almost twice that in the GK group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Importantly, the OS rates were similar for the 2 groups, although GK was used in patients with more complex brain metastatic disease and with no other therapeutic alternative.

摘要

目的

作者回顾性分析了单一中心采用伽玛刀(GK)和线性加速器(LINAC)立体定向放射外科治疗脑转移瘤的经验,并对结果进行了比较。

方法

2010 年 7 月至 2012 年 7 月,63 例脑转移瘤患者接受了放射外科治疗。其中,28 例(83 个病灶)采用 GK 治疗,35 例(47 个病灶)采用 LINAC 治疗。主要结局为基于病灶的局部无进展生存率(LPFS),次要结局为基于患者的总生存率(OS)。统计分析包括标准检验和 Cox 回归共享脆弱性模型,以考虑患者内相关性。

结果

GK 组的中位随访时间为 11.7 个月(中位数 7.9 个月,范围 1.7-32 个月),LINAC 组为 18.1 个月(中位数 17 个月,范围 7.5-28.7 个月)。GK 组每个患者的平均病灶数为 2.5(范围 1-9),LINAC 组为 1(范围 1-3)(p<0.01,2 样本 t 检验)。GK 组有更多的放射抗拒性病变(如黑色素瘤)和更多位于功能区的病变。选择 GK 而不是 LINAC 的其他技术原因是 LINAC 运动的限制,特别是如果病变位于后颅窝下部或多个病变靠近高度功能区(如脑干),无法用 LINAC 进行最佳剂量学评估。GK 组的边缘剂量中位数为 24 Gy,LINAC 组为 20 Gy(p<0.01,2 样本 t 检验)。对于 GK,3、6、9、12 和 17 个月的累积 LPFS 率分别为 96.96%、96.96%、96.96%、88.1%和 81.5%,直到 32 个月保持稳定。对于 LINAC,3、6、12、17、24 和 33 个月的累积 LPFS 率分别为 91.5%、91.5%、91.5%、79.9%、55.5%和 17.1%(对数秩检验,p=0.03)。在 Cox 回归共享脆弱性模型中,LINAC 组的局部进展风险几乎是 GK 组的两倍(HR 1.92,p>0.05)。GK 组的平均 OS 为 16.0 个月(95%CI 11.2-20.9 个月),LINAC 组为 20.9 个月(95%CI 16.4-25.3 个月)。单变量和多变量分析显示,较低的分级预后评估(GPA)评分、最后一次影像学评估时未控制的全身状态以及年龄较大与较低的 OS 相关;通过 Cox 回归调整这些协变量后,两组的 OS 相似。

结论

在这项比较 GK 和 LINAC 立体定向放射外科治疗脑转移瘤的回顾性研究中,病情更严重的患者采用 GK 治疗,包括病变数量较多、放射抗拒性较强或位于高度功能区的患者。LINAC 组的局部进展风险几乎是 GK 组的两倍,尽管差异无统计学意义。重要的是,尽管 GK 用于治疗具有更复杂脑转移瘤疾病且没有其他治疗选择的患者,但两组的 OS 率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验