Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care, and Pain Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Medicine, Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Pain. 2017 Jul;158(7):1264-1271. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000910.
The use of inactive placebos in early translational trials of potentially analgesic compounds is discouraged because of the side-effect profiles of centrally acting analgesics. Therefore, benzodiazepines are used, although their use has not been validated in this context. Whether benzodiazepines confound the results of acute pain tests is unknown. Midazolam (0.06 mg/kg) as an active placebo was investigated in 3 nociceptive models that included contact heat, electrical pain, and pressure pain thresholds in 24 healthy volunteers. Fentanyl (1 μg/kg) served as an internal validator in this randomized, placebo (saline) controlled, 3-way cross-over trial. The primary outcome parameter (contact heat pain) was analyzed using a one-way, repeated measures analysis of variance and Tukey's post test. Midazolam did not reduce pain ([numeric rating scale], 0-100) in a statistically significant manner compared with placebo for the contact heat (mean difference -1.7, 95% confidence interval -10.6 to 7.3; P = 0.89) or electrical pain (4.3, -5.1 to 13.7; P = 0.51) test, nor did it raise the pressure pain thresholds (-28 kPa, -122; 64 kPa, P = 0.73). The width of the confidence intervals suggested that there were no clinically meaningful analgesic effects compared with the placebo. In contrast, the analgesic efficacy of fentanyl was effectively demonstrated in all 3 models (P < 0.01 vs midazolam and placebo). The findings of this study show that midazolam can be used as an active placebo in analgesic drug trials. Furthermore, the proposed models were simple to implement and very effective in detecting analgesia. The test battery can be used in translational trials for new compounds and comes with an active placebo and an optional active comparator.
在潜在镇痛化合物的早期转化试验中,不鼓励使用无活性安慰剂,因为中枢作用镇痛药的副作用特征。因此,使用苯二氮䓬类药物,尽管它们在这种情况下尚未得到验证。苯二氮䓬类药物是否会混淆急性疼痛测试的结果尚不清楚。在 24 名健康志愿者中,我们研究了咪达唑仑(0.06mg/kg)作为一种活性安慰剂在 3 种伤害感受模型中的作用,包括接触热、电痛和压力疼痛阈值。芬太尼(1μg/kg)作为内部验证剂用于这项随机、安慰剂(盐水)对照、3 向交叉试验中。使用单向重复测量方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验对主要结局参数(接触热痛)进行分析。与安慰剂相比,咪达唑仑在统计学上没有显著减轻接触热(数字评定量表,0-100)或电痛(4.3,-5.1 至 13.7;P=0.51)模型中的疼痛,也没有提高压力疼痛阈值(-28kPa,-122;64kPa,P=0.73)。置信区间的宽度表明,与安慰剂相比,没有明显的临床镇痛效果。相比之下,芬太尼在所有 3 种模型中的镇痛效果都得到了有效证明(P<0.01 与咪达唑仑和安慰剂相比)。本研究的结果表明,咪达唑仑可作为镇痛药物试验中的活性安慰剂。此外,所提出的模型易于实施,并且在检测镇痛方面非常有效。测试组合可用于新化合物的转化试验,带有活性安慰剂和可选的活性对照剂。