文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

年龄对与驾驶员分神相关的碰撞风险的影响。

The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.

机构信息

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):258-265. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw234.


DOI:10.1093/ije/dyw234
PMID:28338711
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Driver distraction is a major contributing factor to crashes, which are the leading cause of death for the US population under 35 years of age. The prevalence of secondary-task engagement and its impacts on distraction and crashes may vary substantially by driver age. METHODS: Driving performance and behaviour data were collected continuously using multiple cameras and sensors in situ for 3542 participant drivers recruited for up to 3 years for the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study. Secondary-task engagement at the onset of crashes and during normal driving segments was identified from videos. A case-cohort approach was used to estimate the crash odds ratios associated with, and the prevalence of, secondary tasks for four age groups: 16-20, 21-29, 30-64 and 65-98 years of age. Only severe crashes (property damage and higher severity) were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Secondary-task-induced distraction posed a consistently higher threat for drivers younger than 30 and above 65 when compared with middle-aged drivers, although senior drivers engaged in secondary tasks much less frequently than their younger counterparts. Secondary tasks with high visual-manual demand (e.g. visual-manual tasks performed on cell phones) affected drivers of all ages. Certain secondary tasks, such as operation of in-vehicle devices and talking/singing, increased the risk for only certain age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Teenaged, young adult drivers and senior drivers are more adversely impacted by secondary-task engagement than middle-aged drivers. Visual-manual distractions impact drivers of all ages, whereas cognitive distraction may have a larger impact on young drivers.

摘要

背景:驾驶员分神是导致撞车的一个主要因素,而撞车是美国 35 岁以下人群死亡的主要原因。次要任务参与的普遍性及其对分心和撞车的影响可能因驾驶员年龄的不同而有很大差异。

方法:使用多个摄像机和传感器在现场连续收集了 3542 名参与者驾驶员的驾驶性能和行为数据,这些驾驶员的招募时间最长可达 3 年,用于第二战略公路研究计划自然驾驶研究。从视频中确定了撞车事故发生时和正常驾驶时段的次要任务参与情况。采用病例-队列方法,估计与四个年龄组(16-20 岁、21-29 岁、30-64 岁和 65-98 岁)相关的次要任务的撞车几率比和次要任务的流行率。仅包括严重撞车事故(财产损失和更高严重程度)进行了分析。

结果:与中年驾驶员相比,年龄在 30 岁以下和 65 岁以上的驾驶员因次要任务引起的分心而面临更高的威胁,尽管老年驾驶员参与次要任务的频率远低于年轻驾驶员。视觉-手动需求高的次要任务(例如在手机上执行的视觉-手动任务)会影响所有年龄段的驾驶员。某些次要任务,例如操作车内设备和交谈/唱歌,仅增加了某些年龄组的风险。

结论:青少年、年轻成年驾驶员和老年驾驶员比中年驾驶员更容易受到次要任务参与的不利影响。视觉-手动干扰会影响所有年龄段的驾驶员,而认知干扰可能对年轻驾驶员的影响更大。

相似文献

[1]
The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.

Int J Epidemiol. 2017-2-1

[2]
Multitasking additional-to-driving: Prevalence, structure, and associated risk in SHRP2 naturalistic driving data.

Accid Anal Prev. 2020-2-6

[3]
Evaluating the causal effects of cellphone distraction on crash risk using propensity score methods.

Accid Anal Prev. 2020-5-29

[4]
Effect of age and secondary task engagement on motor vehicle crashes in a naturalistic setting.

J Safety Res. 2020-6

[5]
Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.

Traffic Inj Prev. 2016-7-3

[6]
The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.

Accid Anal Prev. 2018-7-19

[7]
Distracted Driving and Risk of Crash or Near-Crash Involvement Among Older Drivers Using Naturalistic Driving Data With a Case-Crossover Study Design.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019-3-14

[8]
Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.

Traffic Inj Prev. 2018-2-28

[9]
Using event-triggered naturalistic data to examine the prevalence of teen driver distractions in rear-end crashes.

J Safety Res. 2016-6

[10]
How are different sources of distraction associated with at-fault crashes among drivers of different age gender groups?

Accid Anal Prev. 2022-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Modeling of injury severity of distracted driving accident using statistical and machine learning models.

PLoS One. 2025-6-16

[2]
Demographic characteristics and trends of cell phone use while driving citations in selected states in the United States, 2010-2020.

Traffic Inj Prev. 2024

[3]
Understanding the domain of driving distraction with knowledge graphs.

PLoS One. 2022

[4]
Identifying regions of excess injury risks associated with distracted driving: A case study in Central Ohio, USA.

SSM Popul Health. 2022-11-18

[5]
Improving Our Understanding of Driving Changes in Preclinical and Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease: The Role of Naturalistic Driving Studies.

J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2022-8-11

[6]
Evaluating Long-Term Outcomes of a High School-Based Impaired and Distracted Driving Prevention Program.

Healthcare (Basel). 2022-3-3

[7]
An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance.

Sensors (Basel). 2021-3-4

[8]
Commentary: The Incidence of Road Traffic Crashes Among Young People Aged 15-20 Years: Differences in Behavior, Lifestyle and Sociodemographic Indices in the Galilee and the Golan.

Front Public Health. 2021-3-4

[9]
Examination of Driver Visual and Cognitive Responses to Billboard Elicited Passive Distraction Using Eye-Fixation Related Potential.

Sensors (Basel). 2021-2-20

[10]
Cellphone laws and teens' calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019.

Inj Epidemiol. 2020-12-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索