• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传适应和表型可塑性有助于在温暖气候下对干旱作出反应时提高叶片水力耐受性。

Genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity contribute to greater leaf hydraulic tolerance in response to drought in warmer climates.

作者信息

Blackman Chris J, Aspinwall Michael J, Tissue David T, Rymer Paul D

机构信息

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Tree Physiol. 2017 May 1;37(5):583-592. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx005.

DOI:10.1093/treephys/tpx005
PMID:28338733
Abstract

The ability of plants to maintain an intact water transport system in leaves under drought conditions is intimately linked to survival and can been be seen as adaptive in shaping species climatic limits. Large differences in leaf hydraulic vulnerability to drought are known among species from contrasting climates, yet whether this trait varies among populations within a single species and, furthermore, whether it is altered by changes in growth conditions, remain unclear. We examined intraspecific variation in both leaf water transport capacity (Kleaf) and leaf hydraulic vulnerability to drought (P50leaf) among eight populations of Corymbia calophylla (R. Br.) K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson (Myrtaceae) from both cool and warm climatic regions grown reciprocally under two temperature treatments representing the cool and warm edge of the species distribution. Kleaf did not vary between cool and warm-climate populations, nor was it affected by variable growth temperature. In contrast, population origin and growth temperature independently altered P50leaf. Using data pooled across growth temperatures, cool-climate populations showed significantly higher leaf hydraulic vulnerability (P50leaf = -3.55 ± 0.18 MPa) than warm-climate populations (P50leaf = -3.78 ± 0.08 MPa). Across populations, P50leaf decreased as population home-climate temperature increased, but was unrelated to rainfall and aridity. For populations from both cool and warm climatic regions, P50leaf was lower under the warmer growth conditions. These results provide evidence of trait plasticity in leaf hydraulic vulnerability to drought in response to variable growth temperature. Furthermore, they suggest that climate, and in particular temperature, may be a strong selective force in shaping intraspecific variation in leaf hydraulic vulnerability to drought.

摘要

植物在干旱条件下维持叶片完整水分运输系统的能力与生存密切相关,可视为塑造物种气候极限的适应性表现。已知来自不同气候的物种在叶片对干旱的水力脆弱性方面存在很大差异,但该性状在单一物种的不同种群间是否变化,以及是否会因生长条件的改变而变化,仍不清楚。我们研究了来自凉爽和温暖气候区域的8个红胶桉(Corymbia calophylla (R. Br.) K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson,桃金娘科)种群在两种温度处理(分别代表该物种分布的凉爽和温暖边缘)下相互种植时,叶片水分运输能力(Kleaf)和叶片对干旱的水力脆弱性(P50leaf)的种内变异。Kleaf在凉爽和温暖气候种群之间没有差异,也不受生长温度变化的影响。相比之下,种群来源和生长温度独立改变了P50leaf。综合不同生长温度的数据来看,凉爽气候种群的叶片水力脆弱性(P50leaf = -3.55 ± 0.18 MPa)显著高于温暖气候种群(P50leaf = -3.78 ± 0.08 MPa)。在所有种群中,P50leaf随着种群原生气候温度的升高而降低,但与降雨量和干旱程度无关。对于来自凉爽和温暖气候区域的种群,在较温暖的生长条件下P50leaf更低。这些结果提供了叶片对干旱的水力脆弱性性状可塑性的证据,以响应可变的生长温度。此外,它们表明气候,尤其是温度,可能是塑造叶片对干旱的水力脆弱性种内变异的强大选择力量。

相似文献

1
Genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity contribute to greater leaf hydraulic tolerance in response to drought in warmer climates.遗传适应和表型可塑性有助于在温暖气候下对干旱作出反应时提高叶片水力耐受性。
Tree Physiol. 2017 May 1;37(5):583-592. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx005.
2
Leaf hydraulic vulnerability to drought is linked to site water availability across a broad range of species and climates.叶片对干旱的水力脆弱性与广泛物种和气候条件下的立地水分有效性相关。
Ann Bot. 2014 Sep;114(3):435-40. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu131. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
3
Adaptive plasticity in plant traits increases time to hydraulic failure under drought in a foundation tree.植物性状的适应可塑性增加了基础树种在干旱下水力衰竭的时间。
Tree Physiol. 2022 Apr 7;42(4):708-721. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab096.
4
Adaptation and acclimation both influence photosynthetic and respiratory temperature responses in Corymbia calophylla.适应和驯化都会影响红桉的光合和呼吸温度响应。
Tree Physiol. 2017 Aug 1;37(8):1095-1112. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx047.
5
Climatic origins predict variation in photoprotective leaf pigments in response to drought and low temperatures in live oaks (Quercus series Virentes).气候起源预测活橡树(栎属绿栎组)叶片光保护色素对干旱和低温响应的变化。
Tree Physiol. 2015 May;35(5):521-34. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv032. Epub 2015 May 4.
6
Drought tolerance traits do not vary across sites differing in water availability in Banksia serrata (Proteaceae).在不同水分供应条件下,瓶干树(山龙眼科)的耐旱特性没有差异。
Funct Plant Biol. 2019 Jun;46(7):624-633. doi: 10.1071/FP18238.
7
Tree hydraulic traits are coordinated and strongly linked to climate-of-origin across a rainfall gradient.树木水力特性在降水梯度上与起源气候密切相关且协调一致。
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Mar;41(3):646-660. doi: 10.1111/pce.13129. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
8
The links between leaf hydraulic vulnerability to drought and key aspects of leaf venation and xylem anatomy among 26 Australian woody angiosperms from contrasting climates.在 26 种来自不同气候的澳大利亚木本被子植物中,叶片水力对干旱的脆弱性与叶片脉序和木质部解剖结构的关键方面之间的关系。
Ann Bot. 2018 Jun 28;122(1):59-67. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy051.
9
Climate-related genetic variation in drought-resistance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii).与气候相关的基因变异与道格拉斯冷杉(Pseudotsuga menziesii)的抗旱性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Feb;21(2):947-58. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12719. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
10
Herb hydraulics: Variation and correlation for traits governing drought tolerance and efficiency of water transport.植物水力特性:控制干旱耐受性和水分运输效率的性状的变异性和相关性。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:168095. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168095. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Transpiration and Water Use Efficiency of Mediterranean Genotypes Under Contrasting Irrigation Regimes.不同灌溉制度下地中海基因型的蒸腾作用和水分利用效率
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;14(14):2232. doi: 10.3390/plants14142232.
2
All together now: A mixed-planting experiment reveals adaptive drought tolerance in seedlings of 10 Eucalyptus species.现在一起来:一项混合种植实验揭示了10种桉属树种幼苗的适应性耐旱性。
Plant Physiol. 2024 Dec 23;197(1). doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiae632.
3
Plasticity in Hydraulic Architecture: Riparian Trees Respond to Increased Temperatures With Genotype-Specific Adjustments to Leaf Traits.
水力结构的可塑性:河岸树木通过对叶片性状进行基因型特异性调整来应对温度升高。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 12;14(12):e70683. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70683. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Contributions of phenotypic integration, plasticity and genetic adaptation to adaptive capacity relating to drought in (Proteaceae).表型整合、可塑性和遗传适应对山龙眼科植物干旱适应能力的贡献。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Apr 21;14:1150116. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1150116. eCollection 2023.
5
Limited hydraulic recovery in seedlings of six tree species with contrasting leaf habits in subtropical China.中国亚热带地区六种叶习性不同的树种幼苗的水力恢复有限。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 11;13:967187. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.967187. eCollection 2022.
6
Leaf Economic and Hydraulic Traits Signal Disparate Climate Adaptation Patterns in Two Co-Occurring Woodland Eucalypts.叶片经济与水力性状揭示两种共生桉树林在气候适应模式上的差异
Plants (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;11(14):1846. doi: 10.3390/plants11141846.
7
Phylogeography of a widely distributed plant species reveals cryptic genetic lineages with parallel phenotypic responses to warming and drought conditions.一种广泛分布的植物物种的系统发育地理学揭示了隐秘的遗传谱系,这些谱系对变暖和干旱条件具有平行的表型反应。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep 9;11(20):13986-14002. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8103. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Extensive Variation in Drought-Induced Gene Expression Changes Between Loblolly Pine Genotypes.火炬松不同基因型间干旱诱导基因表达变化的广泛差异
Front Genet. 2021 May 31;12:661440. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.661440. eCollection 2021.
9
Vulnerability to xylem cavitation of Hakea species (Proteaceae) from a range of biomes and life histories predicted by climatic niche.基于气候生态位预测的来自不同生物群系和生活史的山龙眼属(山龙眼科)物种木质部空穴化的脆弱性。
Ann Bot. 2021 Jun 24;127(7):909-918. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab020.
10
Plant functional traits differ in adaptability and are predicted to be differentially affected by climate change.植物功能性状的适应性各不相同,预计会受到气候变化的不同影响。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Nov 28;10(1):232-248. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5890. eCollection 2020 Jan.